1,721,121 research outputs found

    Supplemental material for Integrated telerehabilitation approach in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    No full text
    Supplemental Material for Integrated telerehabilitation approach in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis by Sonia Di Tella, Chiara Pagliari, Valeria Blasi, Laura Mendozzi, Marco Rovaris and Francesca Baglio in Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare</p

    sj-docx-1-dhj-10.1177_20552076241228928 - Supplemental material for Efficacy of telerehabilitation with digital and robotic tools for the continuity of care of people with chronic neurological disorders: The TELENEURO@REHAB protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-dhj-10.1177_20552076241228928 for Efficacy of telerehabilitation with digital and robotic tools for the continuity of care of people with chronic neurological disorders: The TELENEURO@REHAB protocol for a randomized controlled trial by Federica Rossetto, Fabiola Giovanna Mestanza Mattos, Elisa Gervasoni, Marco Germanotta, Arianna Pavan, Davide Cattaneo, Irene Aprile and Francesca Baglio in DIGITAL HEALTH</p

    supplementary – Supplemental material for Cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reactivity correlate with severity of motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease

    No full text
    Supplemental material, supplementary for Cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reactivity correlate with severity of motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease by Laura Pelizzari, Maria Marcella Laganà, Federica Rossetto, Niels Bergsland, Mirco Galli, Giuseppe Baselli, Mario Clerici, Raffaello Nemni and Francesca Baglio in Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders</p

    sj-docx-1-msj-10.1177_13524585241230236 – Supplemental material for Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depressed individuals with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-msj-10.1177_13524585241230236 for Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for depressed individuals with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study by Marco Rovaris, Elena Toselli, Laura Mendozzi, Sonia Di Tella, Alice Pirastru, Valeria Blasi, Francesca Baglio, Luca Ostacoli, Alessandra D’Abramo, Alessia Incerti, Isabel Fernandez, Francesco Pagnini and Cesare Cavalera in Multiple Sclerosis Journal</p

    Assessment of the usability of a computerized Stroop Test for clinical application

    No full text
    The color-word Stroop paradigm is a neuropsychological test often employed for the evaluation of the cognitive processing when a conflict between different attributes of the same visual stimulus is present. In clinical environments, the standard practice for the Stroop test administration is still based on paper supports and stopwatches. Thus, the aim of the present pilot study was to investigate the usability in clinical practice of a completely computerized system for the Stroop test administration. The computerized system developed for this study was made up of the following modules: i) a PC for stimuli administration and data acquisition connected to two monitors (one for the user, the other for the experimenter); ii) a response system composed of three colored electronic buttons; iii) a wireless electroencephalography (EEG) acquisition module (i.e. headset and dedicated software). The system was installed in the IRCCS Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation and tested on 7 subjects hospitalized in the neurorehabilitation Unit. The developed system was able to provide information about the subjects’ reaction time to stimuli in addition to the traditional behavioral scores. Moreover, the integrated EEG acquisition module allowed monitoring the user’s engagement during the test through the computation of a simple EEG-based evaluation index. We believe that this pilot study could set a further step towards the clinical use of computerized systems to monitor cognitive functions

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore