1,721,015 research outputs found

    Subacute nerve compressions after trauma and surgery of the hand

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: It is accepted that major injuries of the upper limb may require not only fasciotomies but also nerve decompressions. That nerve compression(s) may occur after less dramatic injuries and "routine" surgery distal to the elbow is less well documented in the literature but well known to experienced clinicians. The aim of this study was to identify a possible link between injuries or elective surgery to the distal upper limb and "subacute nerve compressions." METHODS: Over a 5-year period, data of patients who developed clinical symptoms of nerve compressions distal to the elbow within 6 months after trauma or elective surgery to the same upper limb that affected postoperative management were collected prospectively. RESULTS: This study identified 91 patients (49 after trauma and 42 after elective surgery). Compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel was the most common syndrome (73 cases). Fasciectomy for Dupuytren's disease was the most frequent operation involved (23 cases). The average time from injury or surgery to diagnosis of nerve compression(s) was 8 weeks (range, 1 to 24 weeks). Surgical decompression of the involved nerves was performed in 43 patients (47.2 percent), with an average time from diagnosis to surgery of 30.4 weeks (range, 28 to 44 weeks). In the carpal tunnel syndrome group (47 men and 26 women), mean age was 49 years (men, 48 years; women, 50 years) and the male-to-female ratio was 1.8:1. CONCLUSION: Subacute nerve compressions should be considered as a complication during the recovery period after injury and surgery of the upper limb. ©2007American Society of Plastic Surgeons

    A Consensual Sustainability Model:A decision support tool for use in sustainable building project procurement.

    Get PDF
    Carter, K and Fortune, C (2008) A Consensual Sustainability Model: A Decision Support Tool for use in Sustainable Building Project Procurement. RICS Research Paper Series Volume 7, Number 19 February 200

    A Consensual Sustainability Model:A decision support tool for use in sustainable building project procurement.

    No full text
    Carter, K and Fortune, C (2008) A Consensual Sustainability Model: A Decision Support Tool for use in Sustainable Building Project Procurement. RICS Research Paper Series Volume 7, Number 19 February 200

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    DIEP flap with implant: a further option in optimising breast reconstruction

    No full text
    Recent advances in breast reconstruction allow for high expectations regarding long-term symmetry and aesthetic appearance. The DIEP flap is currently considered as an ideal autologous reconstruction. However, there are situations in which the amount of tissue from a DIEP flap is not enough to achieve adequate symmetry. Indications and outcomes for a combined use of DIEP flap and implants are discussed in order to describe and examine a further scenario in optimising breast reconstruction. Between January 2004 and January 2006, all patients who underwent combined DIEP/implant breast reconstruction have been collected and followed prospectively. When clinical assessment demonstrated inadequate amount of tissue in the abdominal region to achieve a suitable unilateral or bilateral reconstruction with DIEP flaps, the patients were counselled about the opportunity of primary augmentation of the DIEP flaps. In cases where DIEP breast reconstruction has been done previously and there is a considerable asymmetry, delayed flap augmentation was considered. Patient's age, indication for surgery, preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy (RT), operative procedure, implant size, location and timing of insertion, complications, outcomes, and follow-up have been gathered. In all cases, textured round silicone gel implants have been used. After 12 months, four-point scales were used to analyse patients' satisfaction and aesthetic outcome. During the study period, 156 patients underwent breast reconstruction with 174 DIEP flaps. Fourteen patients (8.9%) had breast reconstruction with 19 DIEP flaps and 18 implants. The mean follow-up was 20.6 months (range 12-32 months). Fourteen implants were placed primarily at the time of DIEP reconstruction. The average implant weight was 167.2 g with range between 100 and 230 g. Implant/flap weight ratio is about 1:5 corresponding to 20%. In six flaps, the patients had RT before the reconstruction, whilst in three cases of delayed DIEP flap augmentation the patients had RT after the DIEP post-mastectomy reconstruction. One infection and one haematoma, both followed by flap partial necrosis, occurred. After 12 months following the completion of reconstruction, aesthetic scores were all between good and excellent. Surgical indications and outcomes available from this series demonstrate that primary and delayed DIEP/implant augmentation can be a safe and effective option in optimising breast reconstruction with autologous tissue

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore