1,721,003 research outputs found

    Transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure using the premere PFO occlusion system.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of the new Premere patent foramen ovale (PFO) occlusion system. BACKGROUND: Several different devices have been used so far for transcatheter PFO closure but no data has been published so far on the efficacy and safety of the Premere PFO occlusion system. METHODS: Since September 2005, 15 patients (seven males, eight females; mean age 51.2 +/- 10.8 years) at our institution underwent transcatheter PFO closure because of cryptogenic stroke, using the Premere PFO occlusion system. The procedure was performed under fluoroscopic and transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) guidance in all patients. Seven patients (47%) had an associated atrial septal aneurysm and two patients had had >1 stroke. Five patients (33%) had an associated thrombophilia, whereas three patients (20%) had a diagnosis of migraine headache with aura, by the referring neurologist. Residual shunt was assessed immediately after and 1 month (only in 11 patients) after the procedure by both transcranial Doppler and TEE. RESULTS: Premere PFO devices could be implanted in all patients (20 mm size in seven patients, 25 mm size in eight). Fluoroscopy time was 7.3 +/- 1.9 and procedural time was 11 +/- 3 min (range 7-17 min), reflecting our initial learning curve with this device. No complication occurred during the procedure or at follow-up. A residual shunt was noted immediately after the procedure in eight patients (53%) and at 1 month in 4/11 patients (36%). Residual shunt was mild in all patients. After a median follow-up of 4.2 months (0.2-5.8 months), no patient had a recurrent stroke. All patients with migraine headache with aura had resolution of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience with the Premere PFO occlusion system shows that this device is safe and effective

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Long-term efficacy of transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure on migraine headache with aura and recurrent stroke.

    No full text
    To assess the long-term results of transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure on migraine headache with aura (MHA) and on the risk of recurrent stroke. Background: Transcatheter PFO closure is associated with an early improvement of MHA, and a reduction or the risk of recurrent cerebral ischemia, but the long-term outcome after the procedure is unknown. METHODS: We analyzed follow-up data of 38 consecutive patients who had undergone transcatheter PFO closure at our institution because of cryptogenic stroke and had been followed-up for at least 3 years after the procedure. Mean age at closure was 43 +/- 13 years. Thirteen patients (34%) had a diagnosis of MHA made by the primary care physician or the referring neurologist. Migraine disability assessment questionnaire (MIDAS) was used to assess MHA incidence and severity. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 4.8 +/- 1.4 years, two patients had a recurrent stroke (13 and 15 months after the procedure, respectively). Recurrence rate 5 years after the procedure was 5.3%. After 4.9 +/- 1.4 years from the intervention, 12/13 patients (92%, 95% CI 65-99%) had complete resolution in their MHA. Overall, MIDAS score decreased significantly (38.6 +/- 26.3 vs. 4.4 +/- 5.1, P < 0.0001) after the procedure. One patient did not report any improvement of MHA after transcatheter PFO closure, whereas one patient reported a severe relapse of MHA about 1 year after PFO closure. Freedom from recurrent MHA 5 years after the procedure was 85% (95% CI 57-97%). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of recurrent cerebral ischemia and recurrent MHA seems to be low at long-term follow-up after transcatheter PFO closure. Recurrent cerebral ischemia and relapse of MHA seem to be confined to the first 15 months after the procedure

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    A pilot study on the effects of carvedilol on right ventricular remodelling and exercise tolerance in patients with systemic right ventricle.

    No full text
    Patients with atrial repair for transposition of the great arteries and patients with congenitally corrected transposition have a right ventricle (RV) in the systemic position and they may develop RV dysfunction and exercise intolerance with advancing age. No data is available on the effect of carvedilol in patients with dysfunctional systemic RV. METHODS: We studied with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and standard 12-leads electrocardiogram, 8 adults (median age 26 years, range 18-31) with chronic stable heart failure and systemic RV dysfunction (6 patients with atrial repair and 2 patients with congenitally corrected transposition). Assessment was done before and after 12 months of carvedilol administration. The initial dose was 3.125 mg twice daily, and the target dose was 25 mg twice a day. RESULTS: Carvedilol administration was safe and the target dose was achieved in 5/8 (62%) patients. Right ventricular end-diastolic (119+/-31 vs. 112+/-28 ml/m(2), p=0.01) and end-systolic volumes decreased (79+/-17 vs. 65+/-14 ml/m(2), p=0.006), and RV ejection fraction improved (34+/-6 vs. 42+/-7%, p=0.004). Left ventricular ejection fraction increased (44+/-8 vs. 49+/-9%, p=0.01), suggesting a positive biventricular remodelling. Peak oxygen uptake did not change with carvedilol (26.8+/-5.3 vs. 27.3+/-5.7 ml O(2)/Kg/min, p=0.58), whereas exercise duration increased (13.4+/-2.6 vs. 17.3+/-3.1 min, p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In this small cohort, carvedilol administration was safe and it was associated with positive RV remodelling as well as improved exercise duration
    corecore