1,720,971 research outputs found
Adorno y Horkheimer : Prolegómenos a una teoría sobre la cultura de masas
Get PDFFil: Florito Mutton, Alan Matías. UBA
La teoría crítica horkheimeriana: crítica a la ciencia capitalista
Get PDFWe propose to develop the first stage of Max Horkheimer's thought to value the production that him has given to the Marxist thought. The publication of Traditional Theory and critical theory on the part of Max Horkheimer, in 1937, redresses a fundamental importance for Frankfurt's School, provided that in the above mentioned work the elementary points distinguish themselves for the program of the same one. In the following pages we show elements that turn on the false representation that the company has about the scientists who work under the called "traditional theory", as well as the uses that they make regarding the use of the logic or the programs of scientific discovery. The pages of the present article also are accompanied of a methodological offer developed by Horkheimer, to approach the social problematics in a suitable way. We will limit ourselves to cross the text underlining the fundamental differences between a traditional theory, which is necessary to step aside and a new theory, the offer for Horkheimer, which will use him as methodological program to Frankfurt's School, and, that in addition, it is an invitation to approach royal problematics in society. In addition we will develop the economic Marxist elements that Horkheimer thinks fundamental to criticize the supposed neutrality of the science and of the scientific work. to acomplish this we will search on other works from the author
The rationalized irrationality in Max Horkheimer's critical theory
No full textThe critical theory of society as a political program takes an important turn in the socalled second stage of Max Horkheimer’s thought. This stage was marked by exile to North America, between 1933 and 1950, where important changes were generated in the critical theory of the Frankfurt author mainly embodied in his works Dialectic of Enlightenment, written together with Theodor Adorno, and Eclipse of reason. In this passage, or evolution of the horkheimerian thought, a theoretical reformulation can be seen in which the utopia of the first stage of his thought is questioned by the lines of history described in the pages of the philosopher. This has not been problematic: the dialectical character of the theory is a central feature of it, and its reformulation, crossed by the phenomenon of the Second World War, focuses mainly on criticism of Western logos. The appreciations of the works have a certain normative character, and although they describe a certain eclipse of the Western reason denied by the same mythified Enlightenment, they imply a final call to human emancipation.
The essay intends to cover the main criticisms of the works and show that they do not state the death of critical theory, but rather reinforce its dialectical character as a critical description of the history of society
The rationalized irrationality in Max Horkheimer's critical theory
No full textThe critical theory of society as a political program takes an important turn in the socalled second stage of Max Horkheimer’s thought. This stage was marked by exile to North America, between 1933 and 1950, where important changes were generated in the critical theory of the Frankfurt author mainly embodied in his works Dialectic of Enlightenment, written together with Theodor Adorno, and Eclipse of reason. In this passage, or evolution of the horkheimerian thought, a theoretical reformulation can be seen in which the utopia of the first stage of his thought is questioned by the lines of history described in the pages of the philosopher. This has not been problematic: the dialectical character of the theory is a central feature of it, and its reformulation, crossed by the phenomenon of the Second World War, focuses mainly on criticism of Western logos. The appreciations of the works have a certain normative character, and although they describe a certain eclipse of the Western reason denied by the same mythified Enlightenment, they imply a final call to human emancipation.
The essay intends to cover the main criticisms of the works and show that they do not state the death of critical theory, but rather reinforce its dialectical character as a critical description of the history of society
Axel Honneth sobre la Teoría Crítica de Max Horkheimer en Kritik der Macht
No full textIn Kritik der Macht, Axel Honneth analyzes the basic postulates of Max Horkheimer’s Critical Theory. This analysis is part of a broader examination of what he considers to be the main critical theories of the twentieth century. This work focuses on the analysisthat Honneth carries out, and on the evaluation of the judgments that he makes of Horkheimer’s political-critical program. We propose to review the aporias that Honneth points out as deficiencies in Horkheimer’s theory, and then to evaluate them in the light of the Critical Theory of the FrankfurtSchool founder. From the critical positionsthat were developed, we will try to show that both projects conglomerate diverse disciplines such as Marxist theory, Freudian psychology and sociology. These theoretical incorporations make important readjustments to the classical Marxist model andreconfigure the horizon of political action during the 20th century, offering theoretical analyses that continue to be valuable in the spectrum of thepolitical theory in the 21st century.En Kritik der Macht, Axel Honneth realiza un análisis de los postulados básicos de la Teoría Crítica de Max Horkheimer. Dicho análisis se encuadra en un examen más amplio de lo que considera las principales teorías críticas del Siglo XX. Este trabajo se centra en el análisis que Honneth lleva a cabo y en la evaluación de los juicios que le realiza al programa político-crítico de Horkheimer. Nos proponemos realizar un recorrido de las aporías que Honneth señala como deficitarias de la teoría de Horkheimer para luego evaluarlas a la luz de la Teoría Crítica del fundador de la Escuela de Frankfurt. A partir de las posiciones críticas desarrolladas, pretenderemos demostrar que ambos proyectos conglomeran diversas disciplinas como la teoría marxista, la psicología freudiana y la sociología. Estas incorporaciones teóricas realizan importantes reajustes del modelo marxista clásico y reconfiguran el horizonte de acción política durante el Siglo XX ofreciendo análisis teóricos que siguen siendo valiosos en el espectro de la teoría política del Siglo XXI
La propuesta de Hartmut Rosa: Pensar al mundo como punto de resonancia en contra de la alienación y la aceleración capitalistas
No full textIn the first part of the work we propose to explore the arguments that Hartmut Rosa offers in his classic work Alienation and Acceleration in order to demonstrate the author's diagnosis of the epoch. Then, we will analyze the proposal he makes in Indisposability to counteract the forms of life of a new type of totalitarianism that is typical of capitalist acceleration and that he considers as negative with respect to the relationship to which individuals are forced to live in the world. Finally, we will arrive at our own hypothesis about the diagnosis presented by Rosa and to his theoretical proposal of individual-world resonance to affirm that it is novel within the Critical Theory as a tradition.En un primer momento del trabajo nos proponemos explorar los argumentos que Hartmut Rosa ofrece en su obra clásica Alienación y Aceleración para evidenciar el diagnóstico que el autor hace de la época. Luego, analizaremos la propuesta que realiza en Indisponibilidad para contrarrestar las formas de vida de un nuevo tipo de totalitarismo que es propio de la aceleración capitalista y que considera como negativas respecto a la relación a la que los individuos están forzados a vivir en el mundo. Por último, arribaremos a una hipótesis propia acerca del diagnóstico presentado por Rosa y a su propuesta teórica de resonancia individuo-mundo para afirmar que es novedosa dentro de la Teoría Crítica como tradición
VI JORNADAS NACIONALES DE ANTROPOLOGÍA FILOSÓFICA“Usos de técnica, razón e historia en la crítica a la modernidad”Convergencias y Divergencias
Get PDFFriedrich Nietzsche: demolish consciousness, demolish the world
No full textThe book "Against the truth" contains the compilation of three essays of the so -called Nietzschean thought. It is composed of writings that show the critical radicality of Friedrich Nietzsche: it is the concept of truth that must resist the blows of the philosophical hammer. And if you don't resist them, what is left of the world? Because the relationship of truth with science, politics, ethics is total (and apparently necessary). What happens in human consciences if the truth is killed by the demolition of a philosophy that advances against absolutely everything
About Jorge Alemán's critical theory
No full textIn this paper we propose to demonstrate that Jorge Alemán's thought must be understood as a critical theory. We will carry out this task in three movements. In a first moment (I), we will make a tour of the theoretical characteristics that we consider central to his thought and that, in the set that we will propose, make Alemán a critical theorist. We will dwell mainly on works such as Capitalismo (2019) and Ideología (2021). In a second moment (II), we will focus on the diagnosis he makes of neoliberalism taking into consideration the analysis deployed in Pandemónium (2020). Finally (III), we will focus on developing Alemán's theoretical-political proposal in the light of (I) and (II), paying special attention to his classic work Soledad: Común. Políticas en Lacan (2012)
Friedrich Nietzsche: demolish consciousness, demolish the world
No full textThe book "Against the truth" contains the compilation of three essays of the so -called Nietzschean thought. It is composed of writings that show the critical radicality of Friedrich Nietzsche: it is the concept of truth that must resist the blows of the philosophical hammer. And if you don't resist them, what is left of the world? Because the relationship of truth with science, politics, ethics is total (and apparently necessary). What happens in human consciences if the truth is killed by the demolition of a philosophy that advances against absolutely everything
- …
