1,720,961 research outputs found
Figure 7 in The Flint Artefacts from two Workshops at Wadi el-Sheikh, Eastern Desert, Egypt
No full textFigure 7. Knife-fragment, AM E9637, 8.5 cm long, 34 g. Scale 5 cm.Published as part of Florek, Stan, Hikade, Thomas & Carter, Sarah, 2019, The Flint Artefacts from two Workshops at Wadi el-Sheikh, Eastern Desert, Egypt, pp. 121-137 in Records of the Australian Museum 71 (4) on page 131, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.71.2019.1681, http://zenodo.org/record/465336
Figure 9 in The Flint Artefacts from two Workshops at Wadi el-Sheikh, Eastern Desert, Egypt
No full textFigure 9. Preform of crescent knife, AM E9581, 17 cm long, 330 g. Scale 5 cm.Published as part of Florek, Stan, Hikade, Thomas & Carter, Sarah, 2019, The Flint Artefacts from two Workshops at Wadi el-Sheikh, Eastern Desert, Egypt, pp. 121-137 in Records of the Australian Museum 71 (4) on page 132, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.71.2019.1681, http://zenodo.org/record/465336
The flint artefacts from two workshops at Wadi el-Sheikh, Eastern Desert, Egypt
No full textFigure 11. Fragment of crescent knife, AM E9666, 15.5 cm long, 190 g. Scale 5 cm.Published as part of Florek, Stan, Hikade, Thomas & Carter, Sarah, 2019, The Flint Artefacts from two Workshops at Wadi el-Sheikh, Eastern Desert, Egypt, pp. 121-137 in Records of the Australian Museum 71 (4) on page 133, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.71.2019.1681, http://zenodo.org/record/465336
Figure 7 in Egyptian Funerary Boat Model in the Australian Museum: Dating and Analysis
No full textFigure 7. Boat model port (left side)—mummy is facing the wrong way. Photo from 1970s, Australian Museum.Published as part of Florek, Stan, Bleechmore, Heather, Jones, Jana, Mcgregor, Colin, Pogson, Ross & Specht, Jim, 2021, Egyptian Funerary Boat Model in the Australian Museum: Dating and Analysis, pp. 67-85 in Records of the Australian Museum 73 (2) on page 77, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.73.2021.1738, http://zenodo.org/record/717804
Figure 2. X in Egyptian Funerary Boat Model in the Australian Museum: Dating and Analysis
No full textFigure 2. X-ray showing peg attachment of ram's head to the hull (right side).Published as part of Florek, Stan, Bleechmore, Heather, Jones, Jana, Mcgregor, Colin, Pogson, Ross & Specht, Jim, 2021, Egyptian Funerary Boat Model in the Australian Museum: Dating and Analysis, pp. 67-85 in Records of the Australian Museum 73 (2) on page 72, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.73.2021.1738, http://zenodo.org/record/717804
Figure 11 in Egyptian Funerary Boat Model in the Australian Museum: Dating and Analysis
No full textFigure 11. Scanning electron micrograph of a tangential longitudinal section of Ziziphus spina-christi (sidr) wood. Electron micrograph by C. R. Cartwright, The British Museum.Published as part of Florek, Stan, Bleechmore, Heather, Jones, Jana, Mcgregor, Colin, Pogson, Ross & Specht, Jim, 2021, Egyptian Funerary Boat Model in the Australian Museum: Dating and Analysis, pp. 67-85 in Records of the Australian Museum 73 (2) on page 80, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.73.2021.1738, http://zenodo.org/record/717804
Figure 3. X in Egyptian Funerary Boat Model in the Australian Museum: Dating and Analysis
No full textFigure 3. X-ray showing two holes drilled in ram's head, horizontal for pegging horn protrusion and vertical for inserting head insignia. Image by Paula Dredge, adapted by S. Florek.Published as part of Florek, Stan, Bleechmore, Heather, Jones, Jana, Mcgregor, Colin, Pogson, Ross & Specht, Jim, 2021, Egyptian Funerary Boat Model in the Australian Museum: Dating and Analysis, pp. 67-85 in Records of the Australian Museum 73 (2) on page 73, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.73.2021.1738, http://zenodo.org/record/717804
Figure 5. X in Egyptian Funerary Boat Model in the Australian Museum: Dating and Analysis
No full textFigure 5. X-ray showing peg joining central block of timber with hull's side piece. Image by Paula Dredge, adapted by S. Florek.Published as part of Florek, Stan, Bleechmore, Heather, Jones, Jana, Mcgregor, Colin, Pogson, Ross & Specht, Jim, 2021, Egyptian Funerary Boat Model in the Australian Museum: Dating and Analysis, pp. 67-85 in Records of the Australian Museum 73 (2) on page 75, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.73.2021.1738, http://zenodo.org/record/717804
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
