1,721,930 research outputs found

    Fletcher, R.

    No full text

    Fletcher, R B, QX27953

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/385510Surname: FLETCHER. Given Name(s) or Initials: R B. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: QX27953. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 57926.235313 Item: [2016.0049.17803] "Fletcher, R B, QX27953

    Fletcher, R C, 3786922

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/385478Surname: FLETCHER. Given Name(s) or Initials: R C. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 3786922. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: SEA-1300.235249 Item: [2016.0049.17771] "Fletcher, R C, 3786922

    Fletcher, R J, 428699

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/385472Surname: FLETCHER. Given Name(s) or Initials: R J. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 428699. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 57382.235237 Item: [2016.0049.17765] "Fletcher, R J, 428699

    Fletcher, R B, NX80005

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/385508Surname: FLETCHER. Given Name(s) or Initials: R B. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX80005. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 57037.235309 Item: [2016.0049.17801] "Fletcher, R B, NX80005

    Fletcher, R C, NX46200

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/385499Surname: FLETCHER. Given Name(s) or Initials: R C. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX46200. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 21958.235291 Item: [2016.0049.17792] "Fletcher, R C, NX46200

    Fletcher, R, [No Service Number]

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/385487Surname: FLETCHER. Given Name(s) or Initials: R. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: [No Registration Number]. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 11804.235267 Item: [2016.0049.17780] "Fletcher, R, [No Service Number]

    Negotiating Strangeness on the Abortion Trail

    No full text
    Negotiating strangeness refers to a set of feminist care practices that feel out ‘the trail’ as a timespace occupied by those travelling in search of abortion. Responding to Lentin (2004), and drawing on Ahmed (2000) and Cooper (2007a), I show how abortion support practices reveal strangeness as an experience that is brought into being, sometimes as a burden and sometimes as an asset. I develop this argument through a critical, contextual analysis of two interviews with past co-ordinators of ESCORT, a Liverpool based abortion support group catering for Irish women. As the interviews worked on me over time (Gunaratnam 2013), they revealed how strangeness feels out the trail through 1) critiques of displacement, 2) provision of home-like spaces, and 3) challenges to the perception of the abortion-seeker as trouble. Critiques of displacement show how critique can work through, rather than against, care. At times, such critiques risked conflating burdensomeness and strangeness as an effect of displacement. But at other times they were careful to focus on the necessity of displacement, rather than on strangeness, as the problem. In providing home-like spaces, volunteers also had the effect of revealing ‘the promise of the stranger’ (Cooper 2007a), as unfamiliarity frees up personal expression and takes communication beyond the usual stranger civilities (Simmel 1908). This re-placement of abortion-seekers in more comfortable spaces actively used the transient and fleeting nature of the encounter as an asset. When negotiating strangeness took the form of challenges to the perception of the abortion-seeker as trouble, sometimes in racialised terms, it did so in a way which mobilized volunteers’ knowledge of the clinic’s working patterns and acknowledged the impact of working conditions, while facing down the troubling behavior

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore