1,720,969 research outputs found
Reuniting males and females: redescriptions of Nuisiana arboris (Marples 1959) and Cambridgea reinga Forster & Wilton 1973 (Araneae: Desidae, Stiphidiidae)
No full textVink, Cor J., Fitzgerald, Brian M., Sirvid, Phil J., Dupérré, Nadine (2011): Reuniting males and females: redescriptions of Nuisiana arboris (Marples 1959) and Cambridgea reinga Forster & Wilton 1973 (Araneae: Desidae, Stiphidiidae). Zootaxa 2739: 41-50, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27658
Nuisiana
No full textGenus Nuisiana Forster & Wilton 1973 Nuisiana Forster & Wilton 1973: 301. Type species: Nuisiana arboris (Marples 1959).Published as part of Vink, Cor J., Fitzgerald, Brian M., Sirvid, Phil J. & Dupérré, Nadine, 2011, Reuniting males and females: redescriptions of Nuisiana arboris (Marples 1959) and Cambridgea reinga Forster & Wilton 1973 (Araneae: Desidae, Stiphidiidae), pp. 41-50 in Zootaxa 2739 on page 4
Cambridgea
No full text<p>Genus Cambridgea L. Koch 1872</p> <p>Cambridgea L. Koch 1872: 358. Type species: Cambridgea antipodiana (White 1849).</p>Published as part of <i>Vink, Cor J., Fitzgerald, Brian M., Sirvid, Phil J. & Dupérré, Nadine, 2011, Reuniting males and females: redescriptions of Nuisiana arboris (Marples 1959) and Cambridgea reinga Forster & Wilton 1973 (Araneae: Desidae, Stiphidiidae), pp. 41-50 in Zootaxa 2739</i> on page 4
FIGURES 1–6 in Reuniting males and females: redescriptions of Nuisiana arboris (Marples 1959) and Cambridgea reinga Forster & Wilton 1973 (Araneae: Desidae, Stiphidiidae)
No full textFIGURES 1–6. Nuisiana arboris (Marples 1959). 1. Male pedipalp, ventral view; 2. Male pedipalp, retrolateral view; 3. Epigynum, ventral view; 4. Internal genitalia, ventral view; 5. Internal genitalia, dorsal view; 6. Schematic course of internal ducts. Scale bars for figures 1, 2 = 1.0 mm, 3–5 = 0.5 mm. Abbreviations used: C, cymbium; E, embolus; MA, median apophysis; RTA, retrolateral tibial apophysis; ML, median lobe.Published as part of Vink, Cor J., Fitzgerald, Brian M., Sirvid, Phil J. & Dupérré, Nadine, 2011, Reuniting males and females: redescriptions of Nuisiana arboris (Marples 1959) and Cambridgea reinga Forster & Wilton 1973 (Araneae: Desidae, Stiphidiidae), pp. 41-50 in Zootaxa 2739 on page 44, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27658
FIGURES 1–6 in The cosmopolitan spider Cryptachaea blattea (Urquhart 1886) (Araneae: Theridiidae): Redescription, including COI sequence, and new synonymy
No full textFIGURES 1–6. Cryptachaea blattea (Urquhart 1886). 1. Habitus of female, dorsal view; 2. Female abdomen, lateral view, small tubercle arrowed; 3. Epigynum, ventral view; 4. Internal genitalia, dorsal view; 5. Male pedipalp, ventral view; 6. Male abdomen, dorsal view. Scale bars for figures 1, 2, 6 = 1.0 mm, 3–5 = 0.1 mm. Abbreviations used: E, embolus; C, conductor; T, tegulum; Cy, cymbium; S, spermathecae.Published as part of Vink, Cor J., Dupérré, Nadine, Paquin, Pierre, Fitzgerald, Brian M. & Sirvid, Phil J., 2009, The cosmopolitan spider Cryptachaea blattea (Urquhart 1886) (Araneae: Theridiidae): Redescription, including COI sequence, and new synonymy, pp. 55-63 in Zootaxa 2133 on page 58, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18844
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
FIGURES 7–16. Cambridgea reinga Forster & Wilton 1973. 7 in Reuniting males and females: redescriptions of Nuisiana arboris (Marples 1959) and Cambridgea reinga Forster & Wilton 1973 (Araneae: Desidae, Stiphidiidae)
No full textFIGURES 7–16. Cambridgea reinga Forster & Wilton 1973. 7. Male pedipalp of larger male (including the distal end of the tibia), ventral view; 8. Tibia of the larger male pedipalp, retrolateral view; 9. Chelicerae of the larger male; 10. Male pedipalp of smaller male (including the distal end of the tibia), ventral view; 11. Tibia of the smaller male pedipalp, retrolateral view; 12. Chelicerae of the smaller male; 13. Epigynum, ventral view; 14. Internal genitalia, ventral view; 15. Internal genitalia, dorsal view; 16. Schematic course of internal ducts. Scale bars for figures 7–12 = 1.0 mm, 13–15 = 0.5 mm. Abbreviations used: C, cymbium; TTA, terminal tibial apophysis; Co, conductor; RTA, retrolateral tibial apophysis; ML, median lobe; A, atrium.Published as part of Vink, Cor J., Fitzgerald, Brian M., Sirvid, Phil J. & Dupérré, Nadine, 2011, Reuniting males and females: redescriptions of Nuisiana arboris (Marples 1959) and Cambridgea reinga Forster & Wilton 1973 (Araneae: Desidae, Stiphidiidae), pp. 41-50 in Zootaxa 2739 on page 47, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27658
- …
