1,720,986 research outputs found
Theory of Mind as a mediator between emotional trust beliefs and interpersonal communication competence in a group of young adults
Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer in Northeastern Italy: incidence, resectability rate, hospital stay, costs and survival (1990-1992)
BACKGROUND: The incidence of pancreatic cancer and relative hospital stay and costs are not well known.
AIMS: To define the incidence, hospital stay and cost of pancreatic cancer in a well-defined area of Italy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Each new case of pancreatic cancer diagnosed between 1990 and 1992 among 669,703 inhabitants in the Veneto Region of Northern Italy was recorded and followed until death or for 5 years after diagnosis. Four types of hospital stay were defined. Type 1: undiagnosed pancreatic cancer; type 2: first diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, treatment excluded; type 3: main treatment; and type 4: follow-up and disease-related complications. Data were analysed for hospital stay-related procedures, costs and survival.
RESULTS: Pancreatic cancer was diagnosed in 253 patients (12.6/100,000 per year), 43 patients (17.7%) underwent surgical resection, and 93 (36.8%) palliative surgery. The mean duration of type 3 hospital stay was similar for resection, palliative and exploratory surgery. The estimated hospital cost was significantly higher for surgical resection, almost the same for palliative and exploratory surgery, and only slightly lower for medical treatment. Each patient spent a mean of 57.7 days in the hospital. The hospital mortality rate was 4.6% for surgical resection, 22.1% for palliative surgery, and 18.7% for exploratory laparotomy. Overall, the 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 20.9%, 5.1%, 2.9% and 1.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic cancer is an expensive, almost incurable disease. Integrated treatments in specialized Centres should reduce the mortality rate and costs
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Revisione dell'uso della somatostatina long-acting nei tumori endocrini gastro-entero-pancreatici.
- …
