1,721,949 research outputs found
Heart failure and kidney dysfunction: epidemiology, mechanisms and management.
No full textHeart failure (HF) is a major health-care problem and the prognosis of affected patients is poor. HF often coexists with a number of comorbidities of which declining renal function is of particular importance. A loss of glomerular filtration rate, as in acute kidney injury (AKI) or chronic kidney disease (CKD), independently predicts mortality and accelerates the overall progression of cardiovascular disease and HF. Importantly, cardiac and renal diseases interact in a complex bidirectional and interdependent manner in both acute and chronic settings. From a pathophysiological perspective, cardiac and renal diseases share a number of common pathways, including inflammatory and direct, cellular immune-mediated mechanisms; stress-mediated and (neuro)hormonal responses; metabolic and nutritional changes including bone and mineral disorder, altered haemodynamic and acid-base or fluid status; and the development of anaemia. In an effort to better understand the important crosstalk between the two organs, classifications such as the cardio-renal syndromes were developed. This classification might lead to a more precise understanding of the complex interdependent pathophysiology of cardiac and renal diseases. In light of exceptionally high mortality associated with coexisting HF and kidney disease, this Review describes important crosstalk between the heart and kidney, with a focus on HF and kidney disease in the acute and chronic settings. Underlying molecular and cellular pathomechanisms in HF, AKI and CKD are discussed in addition to current and future therapeutic approaches
Ularitide for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure: from preclinical to clinical studies
No full textThe short- and long-term morbidity and mortality in acute heart failure is still unacceptably high. There is an unmet need for new therapy options with new drugs with a new mode of action. One of the drugs currently in clinical testing in Phase III is ularitide, which is the chemically synthesized form of the human natriuretic peptide urodilatin. Urodilatin is produced in humans by differential processing of pro-atrial natriuretic peptide in distal renal tubule cells. Physiologically, urodilatin appears to be the natriuretic peptide involved in sodium homeostasis. Ularitide exerts its pharmacological actions such as vasodilation, diuresis, and natriuresis through the natriuretic peptide receptor/particulate guanylate cyclase/cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway. In animal models of heart failure as well as Phase I and II clinical studies in heart failure patients, ularitide demonstrated beneficial effects such as symptom relief and vasodilation, while still preserving renal function. Subsequently, the pivotal acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) Phase III study, called TRUE-AHF, was started with the objectives to evaluate the effects of ularitide infusion on the clinical status and cardiovascular mortality of patients with ADHF compared with placebo. This review summarizes preclinical and clinical data supporting the potential use of ularitide in the treatment of ADHF.University of Gottingen Faculty of Medicin
The influence of confounders in the analysis of mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with chronic heart failure
Full text linkNatriuretic peptides play an important role in the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with acute and chronic heart failure. Multiple studies have shown that these peptides are liable to the influence of individual factors. For N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) some of these confounding factors have been evaluated over the years such as age, gender, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and body mass index (BMI). The aim of this study was to establish confounding factors of mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) assessment
Clinical outcomes of the AdaptResponse trial – Authors' reply
No full textwhether the position of the left ventricular pacing is necessarily optimal. The left ventricular pacing lead position is important in relation to the clinical and mechanical response to CRT. Both lead placement, guided by cardiac imaging, 2 and positioning, determined by the electrical latency in intracardiac electrograms, 3 effectively improve the CRT response. The paced morphology of the electrograms recorded by the CRT device can reveal the effectiveness of the pacing. A highly effective CRT pacing rate is associated with a high prevalence of CRT responders and low risk of hospitalisation for heart failure. 4 We would like to know how the investigators determined the position of their left ventricular pacing leads for an effective adaptive CRT response. Alternatively, the investigators could have had the option of using multipolar leads, such as quadripolar leads, which do not require optimal lead positioning. Quadripolar leads are known to be associated with lower allcause mortality than conventional bipolar leads. 5 We declare no competing interests.Medtronic; Novo Nordisc; Bayer; Boehringer Ingelheim; Servier; Vifor;Cardior; Impulse Dynamics; EU; Biotronik; Medtronic Japan; Pfizer;Biotronik Japan; Bristol Myers Squibb; Medtronic; Boston Scientifi
Relation of longitudinal changes in quality of life assessments to changes in functional capacity in patients with heart failure with and without anemia
No full textClinical status in heart failure is conventionally assessed by the physician's evaluation, patients' own perception of their symptoms, quality of life (QoL) tools, and a measure of functional capacity. These aspects can be measured with tools such as the New York Heart Association functional class, QoL tools such as the EuropeanQoL-5 dimension, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, patient global assessment (PGA), and by 6-minute walk test (6MWT), respectively. The ferric carboxymaltose in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency (FAIR-HF) trial demonstrated that treatment with intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in iron-deficient patients with symptomatic heart failure with reduced left ventricular function, significantly improved all 5 outcome measures. This analysis assessed the correlations between the longitudinal changes in the measures of clinical status, as measured by QoL tools and the changes in the measures of functional capacity as measured by the 6MWT. This analysis used the database from the FAIR-HF trial, which randomized 459 patients with chronic heart failure (reduced left ventricular ejection fraction) and iron deficiency, with or without anemia to ferrous carboxymaltose or placebo. The degree of correlation between QoL tools and the 6MWT was assessed at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. The data demonstrate highly significant correlations between QoL and functional capacity, as measured by the 6MWT, at all time points (p <0.001). Changes in PGA, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, and EuroQoL-5D correlated increasingly over time with changes in 6MWT performance. Interestingly, the strongest correlation at 24 weeks is for the PGA, which is a simple numerical scale (r = -0.57, p <0.001). This analysis provides evidence that QoL assessment show a significant correlation with functional capacity, as measured by the 6MWT. The strength of these correlations increased over time
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Cell Therapy Improves Quality-of-Life in Heart Failure: Outcomes From a Phase III Clinical Trial
No full text: Patients with heart failure experience limitations in daily activity and poor quality-of-life. Prospective surveillance of health-related quality-of-life supplemented traditional death and hospitalization outcomes in the multinational, randomized, double-blinded CHART-1 clinical trial that assessed cardiopoiesis-guided cell therapy in ischemic heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), a Food and Drug Administration qualified instrument for evaluating therapeutic effectiveness, was applied through the 1-year follow-up. Cell treated (n = 109) and sham procedure (n = 140) cohorts reported improved MLHFQ scores comparable between the 2 study arms (mean treatment difference with baseline adjustment -3.2 points, P = .107). Superiority of cell treatment over sham in betterment of the MLHFQ score was demonstrated in patients with pre-existing advanced left ventricular enlargement (baseline-adjusted mean treatment difference -6.4 points, P = .009). In this highly responsive subpopulation, benefit on the MLHFQ score paralleled reduction in death and hospitalization post-cell therapy (adjusted Mann-Whitney odds 1.43, 95% CI, 1.01-2.01; P = .039). The potential of cell therapy in addressing the quality-of-life dimension of heart failure requires further evaluation for disease relief
- …
