177,112 research outputs found

    Georges Chevrier (1903-1968)

    No full text
    Filhol R. Georges Chevrier (1903-1968). In: Cahiers de civilisation médiévale, 12e année (n°45), Janvier-mars 1969. p. 99

    Georges Chevrier (1903-1968)

    No full text
    Filhol R. Georges Chevrier (1903-1968). In: Cahiers de civilisation médiévale, 12e année (n°45), Janvier-mars 1969. p. 99

    François-Louis Ganshof. — Recherches sur les capitulaires.

    No full text
    Filhol R. François-Louis Ganshof. — Recherches sur les capitulaires.. In: Cahiers de civilisation médiévale, 2e année (n°6), Avril-juin 1959. pp. 221-222

    François-Louis Ganshof. — Recherches sur les capitulaires.

    No full text
    Filhol R. François-Louis Ganshof. — Recherches sur les capitulaires.. In: Cahiers de civilisation médiévale, 2e année (n°6), Avril-juin 1959. pp. 221-222

    Jean Yver. — Égalité entre héritiers et exclusion des enfants dotés, Essai de géographie coutumière

    No full text
    Filhol R. Jean Yver. — Égalité entre héritiers et exclusion des enfants dotés, Essai de géographie coutumière. In: Cahiers de civilisation médiévale, 9e année (n°34), Avril-juin 1966. pp. 256-257

    Aux frontières des coutumes méridionales : Filhol (R.), Le vieux coustumier de Poictou, préface de M. Marcel Garaud, Bourges, Tardy, 1956

    No full text
    Aux frontières des coutumes méridionales : Filhol (R.), Le vieux coustumier de Poictou, préface de M. Marcel Garaud, Bourges, Tardy, 1956. In: Annales du Midi : revue archéologique, historique et philologique de la France méridionale, Tome 69, N°37, 1957. pp. 83-85

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    No full text
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    "Closing the R&D Gap, Evaluating the Sources of R&D Spending"

    No full text
    Both spending and tax policies have been implemented in the United States with the goal of stimulating private sector research and development (R&D). Karier questions whether current R&D policy, especially the research and experimentation tax credit, can contribute to closing the gap between nondefense expenditures on R&D in the United States and such expenditures in other countries, such as Japan and Germany. He also explores possible changes to our current R&D policy to make it more effective.

    R&D Networks Among Unionized Firms

    No full text
    We develop a model of strategic networks in order to analyze how trade unions will affect the stability and efficiency of R&D collaboration networks in an oligopolistic industry with three firms. Whenever firms settle wages, the complete network is always pairwise stable and the partially connected network is stable if and only if spillovers are large enough. If spillovers are small, the complete network is the efficient network; otherwise, the efficient network is the partially connected network. Thus, a conflict between stability and efficiency may occur: efficient networks are pairwise stable, but the reverse is not true. Strong stability even reinforces this conflict. However, once unions settle wages such conflict disappears: the complete network is the unique pairwise and strongly stable network and is the efficient network whatever the spillovers.Networks, R&D collaboration, Oligopoly, Unions

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore