1,721,046 research outputs found

    [Ezetimibe in clinical practice: from laboratory investigations to the IMPROVE-IT trial results]

    No full text
    The impact of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels on cardiovascular risk has been extensively studied. Statins have been demonstrated to significantly reduce LDL cholesterol levels, contributing to cardiovascular risk reduction particularly in patients with high cardiovascular risk. However, low adherence to statin therapy, often due to adverse effects, has raised the need for new pharmacological approaches to combine with statin therapy in order to reach the target levels of LDL cholesterol. Ezetimibe is a selective inhibitor of Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1) protein that regulates the cholesterol uptake from the small intestine into the enterocytes. Ezetimibe has been demonstrated to significantly reduce LDL cholesterol levels in combination with statins and recent trials support its role in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events

    Statins and elderly: from clinical trials to daily practice

    No full text
    Elderly patients represent a rising social problem, due to the exponential growth of persons in these age groups and their atherothrombotic burden. The management of this population still raises several challenges, requiring a balance between elevated cardiovascular risk, clinical complexity, frailty and co-morbidities. Statins represent a main pillar in cardiovascular prevention, lowering serum cholesterol and reducing mortality and ischemic events, especially in high-risk patients. Yet, elderly patients have often been excluded from major clinical trials of statins, thus limiting the experience with these drugs in advanced age. Moreover, important barriers to the use of statins in the elderly exist due to potential risks attributed to altered metabolism, comorbidities, polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions and financial constraints. This situation has led to a "statin paradox", since high-risk elderly patients that would most benefit from the use of statins, may be undertreated with these drugs in real life. The vague indications provided by guidelines mean that this issue is still debated, especially regarding primary prevention. Nevertheless, the benefits in outcome offered by statins cannot be neglected. Efforts should be made in order to focus on the importance of statin use in the elderly and to provide clinicians with adequate tools for case by case decisions

    The clinical relevance of the reversal of coronary atherosclerotic plaque

    No full text
    Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains a leading cause of death globally despite advances in preventive therapies. Understanding of the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis, the interplay between lipoproteins, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and immune responses is critical to treating this disease. The development of vulnerable coronary plaques prone to thrombosis, can lead to acute coronary syndromes, for these reasons, the potential plaque stabilization and regression through pharmacological interventions, particularly lipid-lowering agents like statins and PCSK9 inhibitors is crucial. The imaging techniques such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) play a key role in assessing plaque composition and guiding interventional therapeutic strategies. Clinical evidence supports the efficacy of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in inducing plaque regression, with studies demonstrating reductions in plaque volume and improvements in plaque morphology assessed by IVUS, OCT and NIRS. While pharmacological interventions show promise in promoting plaque regression and stabilization, their impact on long-term cardiovascular events requires further investigation. Multimodality imaging and comprehensive outcome trials are proposed as essential tools for elucidating the relationship between plaque modification and clinical benefit in coronary atherosclerosis. The stabilization or regression of atherosclerotic plaque might serve as the phenomenon linking the reduction in LDL-C levels to the decrease in cardiovascular events. Overall, this review emphasizes the ongoing efforts to advance our understanding of ASCVD pathophysiology and optimize therapeutic approaches for improving patient outcomes

    [Safety and tolerability of oral hypoglycemic therapies in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients at high cardiovascular risk]

    No full text
    Oral hypoglycemic drugs for type 2 diabetes aim at preventing the metabolic effects of hyperglycemia and cardiovascular (CV) events. The evidence of the possible CV risk related to the prescription of some antidiabetic drugs prompted regulatory agencies to require safety studies. This review provides an updated analysis of CV safety profiles for antidiabetic drugs used for the treatment of patients with high CV risk.The most recent studies analyze different aspects of CV morbidity, such as ischemic events, heart failure and arrhythmia, and their interactions with hyperglycemia. The endpoints include major adverse cardiovascular events (CV mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke) and hospitalization for heart failure. There is extra-and intra-class variability of CV risk among different oral hypoglycemic drugs, including sulfonylureas, metformin, glitazones, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Different treatment settings, selectivity towards pharmacological targets and hypoglycemia-related effects may explain the discrepancies observed.This review may guide cardiologists and diabetologists, in collaboration with general practitioners, to make the most appropriate therapeutic decision fitting the characteristics of the individual diabetic patient

    Sharing the multidisciplinary clinical approach to peri- and postmenopausal women. A Delphi consensus among Italian gynecologists, endocrinologists, and cardiologists for an integrated and optimal approach to clinical practice

    Full text link
    Objective: The critical phase of perimenopausal period is marked by a reduction in estrogen levels, leading to various clinical issues (vasomotor and neurodegenerative symptoms, increased osteoporosis risk and cardiovascular risk). These complex clinical scenarios pose challenges to clinicians in providing the right support for diagnosis and treatment. A group of Italian cardiologists, endocrinologists, and gynecologists conducted a survey among expert colleagues to assess consensus on controversial issues and best practices for screening and treating peri- and postmenopausal women. Methods: The Delphi methodology was used to analyze responses from a qualitative expert panel comprising 25 cardiologists, 25 endocrinologists, and 25 gynecologists, selected nationwide. Two consecutive questionnaires were proposed between February and May 2023. Agreement among experts was assessed following the Delphi method as developed by the RAND Corporation. Results: The results of this Delphi Consensus have been shared by the leading scientific societies: Italian Society of Cardiology, Italian Society of Endocrinology, Italian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Italian Hospital Obstetricians Gynecologists Association. Conclusions: The experts highlighted comorbidities and hormone deprivation as crucial clinical problems to be evaluated in perimenopausal women, requiring investigation from cardiovascular and endocrinologic perspectives to assess cardiovascular risk, involving the use of BMI, standard blood samples, endocrine-metabolic tests, and lifestyle assessment, particularly in women with higher cardiovascular and metabolic risks candidates for hormone replacement therapy (HRT). The experts also agreed on the benefits of HRT in improving lipid metabolism and reducing insulin resistance, thereby mitigating the metabolic risks associated with menopause. However, this therapy should be tailored considering individual women's comorbidities and thrombotic risk

    Heart failure outpatient clinics resources in Italy: a viewpoint of Italian Society of Cardiology organization

    Full text link
    The current paper reports the model organization, level of health care, and type of medical and research activities related to the existing heart failure centers of the Italian Society of Cardiology. Of note, we conduced an internal survey among the members of heart failure working group and related hospital and territorial sites about the quality of care and assistance levels according to the local hospital resources and type of diagnostic therapeutic and management resources. Thirty-two hospital ambulatorial structures have been identified, the centers were equally distributed within the national ground, with similar concentration between north and south regions of the Italian country. We distinguished three different levels of organization: (1) basal territorial clinics in which patients with suspected or already diagnosed heart failure (HF) are initially identified and screened; (2) intermediate clinics in which HF patients can be routinary followed by HF specialists supported by a dedicated staff including imaging and arrythmologist experts, and interventional cardiologist; (3) advanced clinics composed by all the technical and staff resources capable of guarantying repetitive invasive assessment, continuous invasive monitoring, dedicated telemedicine structures focused on more advanced HF management integrated by heart transplantation or mechanical assistance programs. Different type of assistance is supported by a relevant number of research activity primarily conducted by the Italian Society of Cardiology or spontaneous studies arranged by HF specialist members. The number of HF centers has increased over the past few decades in proportion to the progressive rise in HF diagnoses and associated hospitalization. The expansion of ambulatory structures has been facilitated by an increasing socioeconomic and research influence. The quality of HF services in Italy could be raised by improving the network and connections between HF specialists, general practitioners (GPs), caregivers, and other specialists frequently working in this field

    Corrigendum to “How cardiologists can manage excess body weight and related cardiovascular risk. An expert opinion” [International Journal of Cardiology 2023 381C 101–104]

    Full text link
    The authors regret to inform the readers that the below acknowledgement is missing from the original publication. “This work was performed thanks to the unconditional support of Novo Nordisk S.p.A.” The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused
    corecore