1,720,971 research outputs found
Comments on: Some recent work on multivariate Gaussian Markov random fields
No full textThis is a commentary on the paper "Some recent work on multivariate Gaussian Markov random fields" (MacNab, Ying C.
On the effect of spatial confounding: an approach based on the theory of quadratic forms
No full textOn the effect of confounding in linear regression models: an approach based on the theory of quadratic forms
Full text linkIn the last two decades, significant research efforts have been dedicated to addressing the issue of spatial confounding in linear regression models. Confounding occurs when the relationship between the covariate and the response variable is influenced by an unmeasured confounder associated with both. This results in biased estimators for the regression coefficients reduced efficiency, and misleading interpretations. This article aims to understand how confounding relates to the parameters of the data generating process. The sampling properties of the regression coefficient estimator are derived as ratios of dependent quadratic forms in Gaussian random variables: this allows us to obtain exact expressions for the marginal bias and variance of the estimator, that were not obtained in previous studies. Moreover, we provide an approximate measure of the marginal bias that gives insights of the main determinants of bias. Applications in the framework of geostatistical and areal data modeling are presented. Particular attention is devoted to the difference between smoothness and variability of random vectors involved in the data generating process. Results indicate that marginal covariance between the covariate and the confounder, along with marginal variability of the covariate, play the most relevant role in determining the magnitude of confounding, as measured by the bias
The Mellin transform as a tool for prior elicitation in disease mapping
No full textDisease mapping encompasses a set of methodologies employed to describe the disease risk distribution over a study region. When the disease under study is rare, counts are heavily affected by random variability, and the estimates of the relative risk at the small-area level are unstable. The main aim of disease mapping studies is the identification of the underlying distribution of the risk. Several approaches have been proposed for modelling unstructured and spatially structured components. After a discussion about the existing proposals for prior specification in disease mapping, we present a novel approach that allows full control on prior specification for the well-known Besag-York and Mollie' model. Our proposal is built to the aim of matching the marginal variability of the structured and unstructured components, so that priors on such components express exactly the same belief in terms of variability allocation. The goal is reached by inversion of the Mellin transform of the distribution of a quadratic form. Both an application and a simulation study are presented for comparison with other proposal
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
