1,720,973 research outputs found
Detecting Stance of Authorities Towards Rumors in Arabic Tweets: A Preliminary Study
No full textA myriad of studies addressed the problem of rumor verification in Twitter by either utilizing evidence from the propagation networks or external evidence from the Web. However, none of these studies exploited evidence from trusted authorities. In this paper, we define the task of detecting the stance of authorities towards rumors in tweets, i.e., whether a tweet from an authority agrees, disagrees, or is unrelated to the rumor. We believe the task is useful to augment the sources of evidence utilized by existing rumor verification systems. We construct and release the first Authority STance towards Rumors (AuSTR) dataset, where evidence is retrieved from authority timelines in Arabic Twitter. Due to the relatively limited size of our dataset, we study the usefulness of existing datasets for stance detection in our task. We show that existing datasets are somewhat useful for the task; however, they are clearly insufficient, which motivates the need to augment them with annotated data constituting stance of authorities from Twitter.Acknowledgments. The work of Fatima Haouari was supported by GSRA grant# GSRA6-1-0611-19074 from the Qatar National Research Fund. The work of Tamer Elsayed was made possible by NPRP grant# NPRP11S-1204-170060 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.Scopu
Are authorities denying or supporting? Detecting stance of authorities towards rumors in Twitter
Get PDFSeveral studies examined the leverage of the stance in conversational threads or news articles as a signal for rumor verification. However, none of these studies leveraged the stance of trusted authorities. In this work, we define the task of detecting the stance of authorities towards rumors in Twitter, i.e., whether a tweet from an authority supports the rumor, denies it, or neither. We believe the task is useful to augment the sources of evidence exploited by existing rumor verification models. We construct and release the first Authority STance towards Rumors (AuSTR) dataset, where evidence is retrieved from authority timelines in Arabic Twitter. The collection comprises 811 (rumor tweet, authority tweet) pairs relevant to 292 unique rumors. Due to the relatively limited size of our dataset, we explore the adequacy of existing Arabic datasets of stance towards claims in training BERT-based models for our task, and the effect of augmenting AuSTR with those datasets. Our experiments show that, despite its limited size, a model trained solely on AuSTR with a class-balanced focus loss exhibits a comparable performance to the best studied combination of existing datasets augmented with AuSTR, achieving a performance of 0.84 macro-F1 and 0.78 F1 on debunking tweets. The results indicate that AuSTR can be sufficient for our task without the need for augmenting it with existing stance datasets. Finally, we conduct a thorough failure analysis to gain insights for the future directions on the task.The work of Fatima Haouari was supported by GSRA grant# GSRA6-1-0611-19074 from the Qatar National Research Fund. The work of Tamer Elsayed was made possible by NPRP grant# NPRP 11 S-1204-170060 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors. Open Access funding provided by the Qatar National Library.Scopu
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
CheckThat! at CLEF 2020: Enabling the Automatic Identification and Verification of Claims in Social Media
Get PDFWe describe the third edition of the CheckThat! Lab,
which is part of the 2020 Cross-Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF).
CheckThat! proposes four complementary tasks and a related task from
previous lab editions, offered in English, Arabic, and Spanish. Task 1 asks
to predict which tweets in a Twitter stream are worth fact-checking. Task
2 asks to determine whether a claim posted in a tweet can be verified
using a set of previously fact-checked claims. Task 3 asks to retrieve text
snippets from a given set of Web pages that would be useful for verifying
a target tweet’s claim. Task 4 asks to predict the veracity of a target
tweet’s claim using a set of potentially-relevant Web pages. Finally, the
lab offers a fifth task that asks to predict the check-worthiness of the
claims made in English political debates and speeches. CheckThat! features a full evaluation framework. The evaluation is carried out using
mean average precision or precision at rank k for ranking tasks, and F1
for classification tasks
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
