9,234 research outputs found
Chapter 14: MD Anderson Publications and Publication Ethics
Dr. Goepfert has served on a number of editorial boards and is keenly interested in the educational dissemination of information critical to cancer research. In this section he talks about some of MD Anderson’s publications and also addresses some controversies with publication. He first raises the ethical issue of how authorship is assigned to a manuscript going out for publication. Today there are guidelines for assigning authorship, but twenty years ago, he explains, some department chairs at MD Anderson reviewed all manuscripts going for publication and insisted on being listed as first author of an article, whether they made any contribution to the research or not. Dr. Goepfert contrasts his own practice of putting his name on a paper only if he has contributed. Dr. Goepfert then shifts subjects and describes several MD Anderson educational publications, beginning with Cancer Bulletin, distributed free to all physicians across Texas.https://openworks.mdanderson.org/mchv_interviewchapters/2010/thumbnail.jp
A study on motivation factors that would affect employee’s job satisfaction at Clay Industries Sdn Bhd / Nurul-Fateha Md Sandollah
Job satisfaction has been a matter of concern and attention in any field of business nowadays. Organizations realize that employee job satisfaction is the essential element to increase employee’s productivity. Employee’s dissatisfaction will lead to high absenteeism, poor performance and also give impact to organization output. Therefore, organization especially HR management must understanding what factor leads employee dissatisfaction and find the solution to overcome this problem. The dissatisfied employee complaints can be a useful source of information for the organization to develop motivation strategies to ensure that all employees are satisfied with their job. The past researcher shows that there are many factors of motivation that affect the employee’s job satisfaction. Therefore, this research study could be the tools that can increase employee’s job satisfaction .This study have been conducted at Clay Industries Sdn Bhd and it involved 300 respondents. In the final chapter, some recommendations were provided for future use to any researcher in this academic field
3b.ATTITUDEwithIMPUTEDdata – for Development and psychometric evaluation of triage questionnaire (QTrix): Exploratory factor analysis and item response theory analysis
3b.ATTITUDEwithIMPUTEDdata for Development and psychometric evaluation of triage questionnaire (QTrix): Exploratory factor analysis and item response theory analysis by Nurul Fateha Abd Rahman, Tuan Hairulnizam Tuan Kamauzaman, Wan Nor Arifin and Abu Yazid Md Noh in Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine</p
2.KNOWLEDGE – for Development and psychometric evaluation of triage questionnaire (QTrix): Exploratory factor analysis and item response theory analysis
2.KNOWLEDGE for Development and psychometric evaluation of triage questionnaire (QTrix): Exploratory factor analysis and item response theory analysis by Nurul Fateha Abd Rahman, Tuan Hairulnizam Tuan Kamauzaman, Wan Nor Arifin and Abu Yazid Md Noh in Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine</p
1.SOCIODEMOGRAPHICdata – for Development and psychometric evaluation of triage questionnaire (QTrix): Exploratory factor analysis and item response theory analysis
1.SOCIODEMOGRAPHICdata for Development and psychometric evaluation of triage questionnaire (QTrix): Exploratory factor analysis and item response theory analysis by Nurul Fateha Abd Rahman, Tuan Hairulnizam Tuan Kamauzaman, Wan Nor Arifin and Abu Yazid Md Noh in Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine</p
3a.ATTITUDE – for Development and psychometric evaluation of triage questionnaire (QTrix): Exploratory factor analysis and item response theory analysis
3a.ATTITUDE for Development and psychometric evaluation of triage questionnaire (QTrix): Exploratory factor analysis and item response theory analysis by Nurul Fateha Abd Rahman, Tuan Hairulnizam Tuan Kamauzaman, Wan Nor Arifin and Abu Yazid Md Noh in Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine</p
Promise - Spring 2020
Rogers Award honors MD Anderson nursing assistant MD Anderson awards highest nursing honor Low-grade serous ovarian cancer survivor establishes research nonprofit Celebrity Chef Cooking Demo makes young cancer patients sous-chefs for a day Bob’s Encore: hope in the fight against pancreatic cancer Board of Visitors welcomes seven new members Board of Visitors awards highest distinction to longtime member A Conversation with a Living Legend raises 2 million for cancer research, education and prevention Get to know Advance Team’s Laura Nelson Cookbook author leaves her mark on gastric cancer researchhttps://openworks.mdanderson.org/promise/1001/thumbnail.jp
Chapter 09: Creating a New Way of Conducting Research and Caring for Patients in a Changing Environment
In this chapter, Dr. Dmitrovsky provides an overview of how MD Anderson must operate in the new environment of research and healthcare economics. He begins by explaining that scientific endeavors traditionally rely on decisive discoveries by individual investigators that also reveal opportunities to development treatments. Today, he says, this process moves ahead via team- and interdisciplinary science, and the institution must educate the next generations of researchers in this way of conducting research. At the same time, MD Anderson must operate in a context of a flat NIH budget while responding to the new economics of the Affordable Care Act. Next, he notes that MD Anderson is supporting the education of the next generation by making investments in junior faculty with the R. Lee Clark Fellowship Program. He explains the award (juried by experts outside of MD Anderson). Next Dr. Dmitrovsky notes that reductions are being made to the length and complexity of informed consent forms so faculty can spend less time on paperwork and more time for their primary activities. He then speaks briefly about faculty recruitment and retention efforts. Then Dr. Dmitrovsky talks about strategies used to encourage interdisciplinary investigation. He speaks in detail about finding ways to provide team members with proper recognition for their contributions (when contribution is traditionally measured by first or last author status) and linking credit to faculty promotion. He also talks about empowering team members to initiate investigations and provides some examples.https://openworks.mdanderson.org/mchv_interviewchapters/1641/thumbnail.jp
Chapter 09: Strengthening Biomedical Editing Nationwide and Within MD Anderson
In this Chapter, first briefly notes his involvement with the Southwest Chapter of the American Medical Writer’s Association and the Council of Biology Editors (with a 22-year membership). He then explains that he had his biggest impact while he served on the Board of Editors in the Life Sciences and in the late 80s worked on the Editorial Certification Examination Development Committee. He describes the examination he helped create to certify competence for editors of biomedical articles and explains the significance of certification. He notes that the Department of Scientific Publications at MD Anderson uses its own battery of tests to evaluate editors’ abilities for abstract reasoning, grammar, and other skills and talents.
Next, Mr. Pagel talks about his Department’s blog, “The Write Stuff,” and two significant projects: his role on the Historical Resources Center Steering Committee, and the development of panel discussions for the Department of Scientific Publications. To begin the discussion of the Steering Committee, he notes that Scientific Publications wrote The First Twenty Years, the first history of MD Anderson. Because of this association with the institution’s history, Mr. Pagel was asked to be part of the Steering Committee when the Historical Resources Center was formed and set as its first goal the publication of an updated institutional history. Mr. Pagel wanted the perspective to be broader than the first book, situating MD Anderson and cancer research in a larger context of other cancer institutions and the history of cancer research. Though not alone in holding this view, he says he had something to do with articulating it for the benefit of the Steering Committee. He describes how James Olsen was selected to be the author and notes other Steering Committee activities.https://openworks.mdanderson.org/mchv_interviewchapters/2275/thumbnail.jp
E. Harold Shryock, MD
A teacher of the ages, administrator, author, lecturer, ambidextrous artist, trick cyclist, Chair of the Department of Anatomy, and Dean of the School of Medicine of Loma Linda University.All descriptions are taken verbatim from: Portraits of Honored Faculty by S. Wesley Kime, MD. Editor Raymond Herber, MD. (Loma Linda, Calif.: Alumni Association of School of Medicine of Loma Linda University, 2005) and are thus not up-to-date as to positions held or contributions made to Loma Linda University Health
- …
