1,720,961 research outputs found
Televisión comunitaria, regulación y participación en Buenos Aires: la experiencia de Faro TV / Community Television, Regulation and Participation in Buenos Aires: The Experience of Faro TV
Get PDFIn 2009 was approved the Argentinian Audiovisual Service Law. In the same year, Faro Community Television was founded. Through the participant observation and interviews, this article addresses the implementation of community-participatory methodologies and the limitations imposed by the legal framework to the development of the Argentinian community television, specifically Faro TV. What we can be affirmed is that communication policies and regulations have a direct influence in the methods used by the community television, but not define them or prevent the participatory process from being deepened. The workshops were perfect space of excellence for the development of these experiences, allowing the formation and multiplication of audiovisual filmmakers. In this way, the participation is materialized, thanks letting the community use the equipment and take its own decisions equipment and decisions; sharing at the same time a dialogic process of production and learning.En el 2009 fue aprobada la Ley de Servicios Audiovisuales en Argentina. En el mismo año fue fundada Faro TV Comunitaria. A través de la utilización de observación participativa y entrevistas, este trabajo reflexiona sobre la puesta en práctica de metodologías comunitario-participativas y las limitaciones impuestas por el marco legal al desarrollo de las televisoras comunitarias argentinas, específica-mente en Faro TV. Lo que se puede afirmar es que las políticas de comunicación y las regulaciones influyen directamente en las metodologías utilizadas por las televisoras comunitarias, pero no las define y ni impiden que el proceso participativo sea profundizado. Los talleres han sido el espacio por excelencia del desarrollo de estas experiencias, permitiendo la formación y multiplicación de realizadores audiovisuales. De esta forma, la participación se materializa, pasando los equipos y decisiones a las manos de la comunidad; y compartiendo un proceso dialógico de producción y aprendizaje
Community Television, Regulation and Participation in Buenos Aires: The Experience of Faro TV
Get PDFEn el 2009 fue aprobada la Ley de Servicios
Audiovisuales en Argentina. En el mismo año
fue fundada Faro TV Comunitaria. A través de la
utilización de observación participativa y entrevistas,
este trabajo reflexiona sobre la puesta en práctica
de metodologías comunitario-participativas y las
limitaciones impuestas por el marco legal al desarrollo
de las televisoras comunitarias argentinas, específicamente en Faro TV. Lo que se puede afirmar es que las
políticas de comunicación y las regulaciones influyen
directamente en las metodologías utilizadas por las
televisoras comunitarias, pero no las define y ni
impiden que el proceso participativo sea profundizado.
Los talleres han sido el espacio por excelencia
del desarrollo de estas experiencias, permitiendo
la formación y multiplicación de realizadores
audiovisuales. De esta forma, la participación se
materializa, pasando los equipos y decisiones a las
manos de la comunidad; y compartiendo un proceso
dialógico de producción y aprendizaje.In 2009 was approved the Argentinian Audiovisual
Service Law. In the same year, Faro Community
Television was founded. Through the participant
observation and interviews, this article addresses
the implementation of community-participatory
methodologies and the limitations imposed by
the legal framework to the development of the
Argentinian community television, specifically Faro
TV. What we can be affirmed is that communication
policies and regulations have a direct influence in
the methods used by the community television,
but not define them or prevent the participatory
process from being deepened. The workshops were
perfect space of excellence for the development
of these experiences, allowing the formation and
multiplication of audiovisual filmmakers. In this
way, the participation is materialized, thanks
letting the community use the equipment and take
its own decisions equipment and decisions; sharing
at the same time a dialogic process of production
and learning
Televisión comunitaria, regulación y participación en Buenos Aires: la experiencia de Faro TV
No full textIn 2009 was approved the Argentinian Audiovisual
Service Law. In the same year, Faro Community
Television was founded. Through the participant
observation and interviews, this article addresses
the implementation of community-participatory
methodologies and the limitations imposed by
the legal framework to the development of the
Argentinian community television, specifically Faro
TV. What we can be affirmed is that communication
policies and regulations have a direct influence in
the methods used by the community television,
but not define them or prevent the participatory
process from being deepened. The workshops were
perfect space of excellence for the development
of these experiences, allowing the formation and
multiplication of audiovisual filmmakers. In this
way, the participation is materialized, thanks
letting the community use the equipment and take
its own decisions equipment and decisions; sharing
at the same time a dialogic process of production
and learningEn el 2009 fue aprobada la Ley de Servicios
Audiovisuales en Argentina. En el mismo año
fue fundada Faro TV Comunitaria. A través de la
utilización de observación participativa y entrevistas,
este trabajo reflexiona sobre la puesta en práctica
de metodologías comunitario-participativas y las
limitaciones impuestas por el marco legal al desarrollo
de las televisoras comunitarias argentinas, específicamente
en Faro TV. Lo que se puede afirmar es que las
políticas de comunicación y las regulaciones influyen
directamente en las metodologías utilizadas por las
televisoras comunitarias, pero no las define y ni
impiden que el proceso participativo sea profundizado.
Los talleres han sido el espacio por excelencia
del desarrollo de estas experiencias, permitiendo
la formación y multiplicación de realizadores
audiovisuales. De esta forma, la participación se
materializa, pasando los equipos y decisiones a las
manos de la comunidad; y compartiendo un proceso
dialógico de producción y aprendizaj
Título: El Protectorado español en Marruecos. Fondos de la Biblioteca Islámica Félix María Pareja
No full textEntrevistada: Luisa MoraTipo de archivo: Imagen y sonidoCeuta: Biblioteca Pública del Estado, 23 de abril de 2019Noticia aparecida en Faro TV sobre la conferencia "El Protectorado español en Marruecos. Fondos de la Biblioteca Islámica Félix María Pareja" de Luisa MoraFormato mp4Se incluyen el cartel y tarjeta del act
Más de medio siglo difundiendo la cultura árabe hispánica
No full textSe incluyen el cartel y tarjeta del actoEntrevistada: Luisa MoraTipo de archivo: Imagen y sonidoCeuta: Biblioteca Pública del Estado, 23 de abril de 2019Noticia aparecida en Faro TV sobre la conferencia "El Protectorado español en Marruecos. Fondos de la Biblioteca Islámica Félix María Pareja" de Luisa MoraFormato mp
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
