1,721,120 research outputs found
Correction: Nucleobases, nucleosides, and nucleotides: versatile biomolecules for generating functional nanomaterials
No full textCorrection for ‘Nucleobases, nucleosides, and nucleotides: versatile biomolecules for generating functional nanomaterials’ by Fang Pu et al., Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, DOI: 10.1039/c7cs00673j.</p
Qun fang pu
No full text元部. 天譜 : 三卷 -- 歲譜 : 四卷 -- 亨部. 穀譜 -- 蔬譜 : 二卷 -- 果譜 : 四卷 -- 利部. 茶譜 -- 竹譜 -- 桑麻葛棉譜 -- 藥譜 : 三卷 -- 木譜 : 二卷 -- 貞部. 花譜 : 四卷 -- 卉譜 : 二卷 -- 鶴魚譜.Yuan bu. Tian pu : san juan -- Sui pu : si juan -- Heng bu. Gu pu -- Shu pu : er juan -- Guo pu : si juan -- Li bu. Cha pu -- Zhu pu -- Sang ma ge mian pu -- Yao pu : san juan -- Mu pu : er juan -- Zhen bu. Hua pu : si juan -- Hui pu : er juan -- He yu pu.王象晉纂輯 ; 陳繼儒, 毛鳳苞, 姚元台仝較 ; 王與胤, 王士和詮次.綫裝, 2函.框21.6x14.6公分, 分上, 中, 下欄. 眉欄刻音切, 小字每行3字 ; 中欄正文8行18字, 小字雙行同 ; 腳欄刻注, 小字每行4字. 白口, 左右雙邊, 單黑魚尾. 版心上鐫"群芳譜", 中鐫卷次及譜次, 下鐫葉次.分元, 亨 ,利, 貞四部 ; 再分為天, 歲, 穀, 蔬, 果, 茶竹, 桑麻葛棉, 藥, 木, 花, 卉, 鶴魚十二譜 ; 每譜前各有卷首, 目錄.内封題"本衙藏板, 翻刻必究"前有崇禎二年[1629]朱國盛序, 後有天啓辛酉[1621]好生居士跋出書年據序.見《香港中文大學圖書館古藉善本書錄》(2001, p. 128)Xian zhuang, 2 han.Kuang 21.6 x 14.6 gong fen, fen shang, zhong, xia lan. Mei lan ke yin qie, xiao zi mei hang 3 zi ; zhong lan zheng wen 8 hang 18 zi, xiao zi shuang hang tong ; jiao lan ke zhu, xiao zi mei hang 4 zi. Bai kou, zuo you shuang bian, dan hei yu wei. Ban xin shang juan "Qun fang pu", zhong juan juan ci ji pu ci, xia juan ye ci.Fen yuan, heng , li, zhen si bu ; zai fen wei tian, sui, gu, shu, guo, cha zhu, sang ma ge mian, yao, mu, hua, hui, he yu shi er pu ; mei pu qian ge you juan shou, mu lu.Nei feng ti "Ben ya cang ban, fan ke bi jiu"Qian you Chongzhen er nian [1629] Zhu Guocheng xu, hou you Tianqi xin you [1621] Haoshengjushi baChu shu nian ju xu.Jian "Xianggang Zhong wen da xue tu shu guan gu ji shan ben shu lu"(2001, p. 128)Wang Xiangjin zuan ji ; Chen Jiru, Mao Fengbao, Yao Yuantai tong jiao ; Wang Yuyin, Wang Shihe quan ci
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
