1,721,012 research outputs found
Hong se zao fan zhe dou Peng hua gao
No full text"1966.10"题名及丛书由编目者拟定.Ti ming ji cong shu you bian mu zhe ni ding
Peng Dehuai ling: Hong se zao fan zhe dou Peng hua gao
No full text"1966.10"题名及丛书由编目者拟定.Ti ming ji cong shu you bian mu zhe ni ding
Lu Shan hui yi: Hong se zao fan zhe dou Peng hua gao
No full text"1966.10"题名及丛书由编目者拟定.Ti ming ji cong shu you bian mu zhe ni ding
Peng da jiang jun: Hong se zao fan zhe dou Peng hua gao
No full text"1966.10"题名及丛书由编目者拟定.Ti ming ji cong shu you bian mu zhe ni ding
Zi shou shu, Tao Zhu
No full text《红色造反者》战报漫画编辑部."1967.1.18"题名及丛书由编目者拟定."Hong se zao fan zhe" zhan bao man hua bian ji bu.Ti ming ji cong shu you bian mu zhe ni ding
Wo dang liao shi si nian sheng wei shu ji, shi ba sui can jia ge ming
No full text《红色造反者》战报打陶漫画小组创作."67.1.4"题名及丛书由编目者拟定."Hong se zao fan zhe" zhan bao da Tao man hua xiao zu chuang zuo.Ti ming ji cong shu you bian mu zhe ni ding
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
