1,721,292 research outputs found
“Paths and Trajectories of Welfare Expansion in New Democracies,” Book review of Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe by Stephen Haggard and Robert R. Kaufman
No full textHybrid Cultural Codes in Non-Western Civil Society: Images of Women in Taiwan and Hong Kong
No full textDeploying Weapons of the Weak in Civil Society: Political Culture in Hong Kong and Taiwan
No full textTime domain non linear strip theory for ship motions
Get PDFA new implementation of strip theory is proposed based on the strip theory by Salvesen, et al. [1] and early work by Westlake and Wilson [2]. Compared with traditional strip theory, the main difference is that the calculation is carried out in the time domain. This makes it possible to cope with relatively large-amplitude motions and non-constant forward speed problems. At each time step, the exact underwater sections are extracted; the velocity potential is required to satisfy this instantaneous body boundary condition, therefore the added mass, damping coefficients and exciting forces are time-variant, which produce a non-linearity. The diffraction force is added to work of Westlake and Wilson, and the results show the effect of diffraction force is significant
A WIP-based Exception Management Model for Integrated Circuit Back-end Production Processes
No full text
Multi-objectives exception management model for semiconductor back-end environment under turnkey service
No full textGoing Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
