326,075 research outputs found

    John Fahey

    No full text
    30John (Jack) Fahey first arrived in the Territory with "Ryko" in 1914 when the two cycled from Adelaide to Darwin (see item http://hdl.handle.net/10070/250646). In August 1915 Fahey rode back to Adelaide to enlist in the AIF (his journal records that after "a few days rest" he entered camp). Ryko and Mr. J. Hoskins received letters from Fahey during the war, written from 'Belgium' under various dates. Fahey was a noted long distance cyclist of the day having previously ridden from Adelaide to Perth in 1911, and return in 1912 (the prospect of sea sickness being more daunting to Fahey than the ride of over 2,500 kilometres).Unit embarked from Sydney on board HMAT A38 'Ulysses' on 20 February 1916. Transferred from No 1 Mining Corps to 2nd Tunnelling Company. Returned to Australia 20 May 1919 per 'Nestor'.LabourerAustralian Imperial Force2nd Tunnelling Compan

    Fahey, A M, NX53301

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/384423Surname: FAHEY. Given Name(s) or Initials: A M. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX53301. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 47798.230165 Item: [2016.0049.16716] "Fahey, A M, NX53301

    P. Kotler, L. Fahey et S. Jatusripitak. La concurrence totale : les leçons du marketing stratégique japonais

    No full text
    Cordonnier Isabelle. P. Kotler, L. Fahey et S. Jatusripitak. La concurrence totale : les leçons du marketing stratégique japonais. In: Politique étrangère, n°2 - 1988 - 53ᵉannée. pp. 512-513

    THE EU AND US GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS SANCTION REGIMES: Useful Complementary Instruments to Advance Protection of Universal Values? A Legal Appraisal

    No full text
    This chapter examines legal aspects of Global Human Rights Sanction programmes enacted by the US and the EU to counter human rights abuses. Major differences between the EU and US legal regimes are identified as well as the way they were enacted in the practice. After discussing criticism addressed against the two sanction regimes, an assessment is made of whether these legal instruments contribute to promote respect for human rights. The EU has been far more selective in using restrictive measures than the US in the case of human rights breaches. In contrast to the US Global Magnitsky Programmes, the EU scheme can be considered residual with respect to third country sanctions regimes. While the deterrent effect has been overall modest, the EU Global Human Rights Sanction Regime has been a useful signalling instrument in the following situations: (a) to react to gross violations of human rights when there are no third country specific sanctions regimes; (b) when a member of the UNSC with veto power is responsible for these breaches (as in the case of China and Russia). The two Global Human Rights Sanction programmes are useful legal instruments that complement other diplomatic tools used by the US and EU to reinforce respect of human rights

    Appropriateness of prescribing for childhood eczema: evidence from a community-based study

    No full text
    Data on dispensed prescriptions of topical corticosteroids and emollients were analysed in a population of 25 484 children aged ? 6 years in Tayside, Scotland. Over a 17-month period, 5818 (22.8%) children were prescribed a topical corticosteroid; half of this group, (2946; 50.6%) were not prescribed any emollient. In the group of children prescribed topical corticosteroids, 3505/5818 (60.2%) received combined preparations of topical corticosteroids with antimicrobials over this time period, and potent or very potent preparations were prescribed for 923/5818 (15.9%

    Marriner S. Eccles Christmas and New Year correspondence [05]

    No full text
    Holiday correspondence from 1942 and 1943 between Marriner S. Eccles and others, including associates around the country, colleagues in the Federal Reserve system and members of the Roosevelt Administration. Correspondents included U.S. Attorney General Francis Biddle; Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau, Jr.; Dean R. Brimhall of the Works Progress Administration; Agriculture Secretary Henry A. Wallace; Paul V. McNutt, Chairman of the War Manpower Commission; W. C. Coffey, President of the University of Minnesota; and John H. Fahey, Chairman of the Home Owners Loan Corporation

    A concept for a long-term scalable bioengineering model of primary care

    No full text
    We present a concept for development of a unified bioengineering framework that consolidates efforts in extending the geographical boundaries and outreach of primary care in Ireland and ensure its long-term scalability. This framework encompasses infrastructures, devices, systems, techniques, materials, engineering practices and socio-technical set-ups for improved access, safety and quality of care at national and global levels. In particular, we address the development of special purpose solutions, technologies and devices for healthcare from a bioengineering perspective, within the wider healthcare and biotechnology agendas in Ireland

    Introduction: On Framing Convergence of the EU with the Global Legal Order

    No full text
    The EU’s place in the global legal order can be understood as arguably a highly dynamic and complex process which is the antithesis of static which is about convergence. Arguably, convergence fits neatly with understandings of EU global actorness and global ambitions. A form of convergence ethic dominates the EU’s actions. Convergence has a prevalence to it but yet may be also said not to be well understood in the context of EU studies and political science with respect to its legal peculiarities. Analytical blind spots may not be easily ‘taxonomised’. Arguably, today much convergence of EU law and the EU in the world comes from the mimicking/ transfer/ copying or integration of European rules, practices or ideals into other third party contexts, from the formal to the informal, direct to the indirect. Yet who and what should be the form of study of these analytical blindspots of the world? Some argue that the CJEU is the main agent of divergence practices as to internal matters, internal competences and internal views of EU integration. From a legal perspective placing the Court inside and outside of the narrative can have a dramatic impact on convergence narratives. It also may depend upon a particular moment in (political) space and (political) time(s). For example, the EU’s responses to the demise of the WTO has been to formulate divergence therefrom. The most significant dimension of the new political strategy of the European Commission of late 2019 is a ‘Green New Deal’, predicated ultimately upon convergence of all EU policies as to the environment. This book project seeks to delve into the forms and action component of EU convergence and isolate its meaning and plot its direction in context. All authors subscribe to the notion of EU as an exceptional convergence actor within the global legal order. The book isolates the methodology of this exceptionalism as a normative and descriptive state of affairs. All authors subscribe to the idea that the EU practices and preaches convergence in the global legal order increasingly with an explicitness, openness and directness which is sometimes at odds with international law and/ or international politics in its own unique way
    corecore