1,720,981 research outputs found
RabbitStamp Test Sequence
No full text# RabbitStamp sequence by LISA ULB
The test sequence "RabbitStamp" is provided by Sarah Fachada, Yupeng Xie, Daniele Bonatto, Gauthier Lafruit, Mehrdad Teratani, members of the LISA department, EPB (Ecole Polytechnique de Bruxelles), ULB (Universite Libre de Bruxelles), Belgium.
# License:
CC BY-NC-SA
ONLY Available for Academic Usage
# Terms of Use:
Anykind of publication or report using this sequence should refer to the following references.
[1] Sarah Fachada, Yupeng Xie, Daniele Bonatto, Gauthier Lafruit, Mehrdad Teratani, "RabbitStamp Test Sequence", 2021.
@misc{fachada_RabbitStamp_2021,
title = {{RabbitStamp} {Test} {Sequence}},
author = {Fachada, Sarah and Xie; Yupeng and Bonatto, Daniele and Lafruit, Gauthier and Teratani, Mehrdad },
month = jul,
year = {2021},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.5053771}
}
[2] Sarah Fachada, Yupeng Xie, Daniele Bonatto, Gauthier Lafruit, Mehrdad Teratani, "[DLF] Plenoptic 2.0 Multiview Lenslet Dataset and Preliminary Experiments [m56429]", 2021.
@article{fachada_RabbitStamp_2021,
title = {[DLF] {Plenoptic} 2.0 {Multiview} {Lenslet} {Dataset} and {Preliminary} {Experiments} [m56429]},
author = {Fachada, Sarah and Xie; Yupeng and Bonatto, Daniele and Lafruit, Gauthier and Teratani, Mehrdad },
journal = {ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11},
month = apr,
year = {2021}
}
[3] Sarah Fachada, Yupeng Xie, Daniele Bonatto, Gauthier Lafruit, Mehrdad Teratani, "[LVC] Update for RabbitStamp: Plenoptic 2.0 Multiview Lenslet Dataset [m57100]", 2021.
@article{fachada_RabbitStamp_2021,
title = {[LVC] {Update} for {RabbitStamp}: {Plenoptic} 2.0 {Multiview} {Dataset} [m56429]},
author = {Fachada, Sarah and Xie; Yupeng and Bonatto, Daniele and Lafruit, Gauthier and Teratani, Mehrdad },
journal = {ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11},
month = jul,
year = {2021}
}
[4] Sarah Fachada, Yupeng Xie, Daniele Bonatto, Gauthier Lafruit, Mehrdad Teratani, "[LVC] Exploration Experiments using RabbitStamp Multiview Lenslet Images [m57101]", 2021.
@article{fachada_RabbitStamp_2021,
title = {[LVC] {Exploration} {Experiments} {Using} {RabbitStamp} {Multiview} {Lenslet} {Images} [m56429]},
author = {Fachada, Sarah and Xie; Yupeng and Bonatto, Daniele and Lafruit, Gauthier and Teratani, Mehrdad},
journal = {ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11},
month = jul,
year = {2021}
}
# Production:
Laboratory of Image Synthesis and Analysis, LISA department, Ecole Polytechnique de Bruxelles, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.
# Content:
This dataset contains a test scene acquired with a raytrix camera [1] array of 7x3 views. For details of the dataset, please refer to the references mentioned above.
The dataset contains:
- a `depth_7x3_center` depth maps computed with DERS reference software [2] in yuv40016ble format and json configuration files to do so,
- a `multiview_7x3_5x5_images` Calibrated subimages computed with RLC [3] in yuv42010ble format, the cameras.json with the camera parameters and view_synthesis.json with the view synthesis experiment.
- a `multiview_7x3_lenslets` folder containing the lenslet views in yuv42010ble format, the Raytrix xml calibration file and RLC cfg file for conversion to multiview.
# References and links:
[1] Raytrix, https://raytrix.de/
[2] S. Rogge and D. Bonatto and J. Sancho and R. Salvador and E. Juarez and A. Munteanu and G. Lafruit, "MPEG-I Depth Estimation Reference Software", in 2019 International Conference on 3D Immersion (IC3D), 2019.
[3] M. Teratani and T. Fujii, "[MPEG-I Visual] Conversion of Lenslet Data Capture by Single Focussed Plenoptic Camera to Multiview Video using RLC0.3 [N18567]", ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, 201
Transparent Magritte Test Sequence
No full textTransparent-Magritte sequence by LISA ULB
The test sequence "Transparent Magritte" is provided by Sarah Fachada, Daniele Bonatto, Mehrdad Teratani, Gauthier Lafruit, members of the LISA department, EPB, ULB.
License:
CC BY-NC-SA
Terms of Use:
Anykind of publication or report using this sequence should refer to the following references.
[1] Sarah Fachada, Daniele Bonatto, Mehrdad Teratani, Gauthier Lafruit, "Transparent Magritte Test Sequence", 2021.
@misc{fachada_transparent_2021,
title = {Transparent {Magritte} {Test} {Sequence}},
author = {Fachada, Sarah and Bonatto, Daniele and Teratani, Mehrdad and Lafruit, Gauthier},
month = feb,
year = {2021},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.4488243}
}
[2] Sarah Fachada, Daniele Bonatto, Mehrdad Teratani, and Gauthier Lafruit, "Light Field Rendering for non-Lambertian Objects," presented at the Electronic Imaging, 2021.
@inproceedings{fachada_light_2021,
title = {Light {Field} {Rendering} for non-{Lambertian} {Objects}},
booktitle = {Electronic {Imaging}},
author = {Fachada, Sarah and Bonatto, Daniele and Teratani, Mehrdad and Lafruit, Gauthier},
year = {2021}
}
Production
Laboratory of Image Synthesis and Analysis, LISA department, EPB, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.
Content:
This dataset contains a test scene created and rendered with Blender [1] and the addon script [2] extended for Blender 2.8. We provide the Bblender file and the rendered scene.
The scene contains a transparent refractive torus rendered in a regular camera array of 21x21 cameras.
In addition to the 3D model, two folders are available:
- `centered_cameras` resolution of 1000x1000, the cameras are centered on the refractive torus.
- `parallel_cameras` resolution of 2000x2000, the cameras are parallel, with a principal point at the center of the image.
Each of these folders contains:
- a `camera.json` file in OMAF coordinates system (Camera position: X: forwards, Y:left, Z: up, Rotation: yaw, pitch, roll) [3],
- a `parameters.cfg` generated with [2],
- a `texture` folder containing the rendered views in png format,
- a `depth` folder containing the associated depth maps in exr format.
References and links:
[1] Blender Online Community, "Blender - a 3D modelling and rendering package." Blender Institute, Amsterdam: Blender Foundation, 2020.
[2] K. Honauer, O. Johannsen, D. Kondermann, and B. Goldluecke, "A Dataset and Evaluation Methodology for Depth Estimation on 4D Light Fields" in Asian Conference on Computer Vision, 2016,
https://github.com/lightfield-analysis/blender-addon
https://github.com/dbonattoj/blender-addon
[3] B. Kroon, "Reference View Synthesizer (RVS) manual [N18068]," ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, Macau SAR, China, p. 19, Oct. 2018.
https://mpeg.chiariglione.org/standards/mpeg-i/omnidirectional-media-formatAcknoledgments:
This work was supported by
Les Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Belgium, under Grant n°3679514$, ColibriH
The European Commision project n°951989 on Interactive Technologies, H2020-ICT-2019-3, Hovitron.
Sarah Fachada is a Research Fellow of the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Belgiu
Magritte Sphere
No full text# Magritte-Sphere sequence by LISA ULB
The test sequence "Magritte Sphere" is provided by Sarah Fachada, Daniele Bonatto, Mehrdad Teratani, Gauthier Lafruit, members of the LISA department, EPB (Ecole Polytechnique de Bruxelles), ULB (Universite Libre de Bruxelles), Belgium.
# License:
CC BY-NC-SA
# Terms of Use:
Anykind of publication or report using this sequence should refer to the following references.
[1] Sarah Fachada, Daniele Bonatto, Mehrdad Teratani, Gauthier Lafruit, "Magritte Sphere Test Sequence", 2021.
@misc{fachada_magritte_2021,
title = {{Magritte} {Sphere} {Test} {Sequence}},
author = {Fachada, Sarah and Bonatto, Daniele and Teratani, Mehrdad and Lafruit, Gauthier},
month = feb,
year = {2021},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.5048265}
}
[2] Sarah Fachada, Daniele Bonatto, Mehrdad Teratani, and Gauthier Lafruit, "Light Field Rendering for non-Lambertian Objects," presented at the Electronic Imaging, 2021.
@inproceedings{fachada_light_2021,
title = {Light {Field} {Rendering} for non-{Lambertian} {Objects}},
booktitle = {Electronic {Imaging}},
author = {Fachada, Sarah and Bonatto, Daniele and Teratani, Mehrdad and Lafruit, Gauthier},
year = {2021}
}
# Production:
Laboratory of Image Synthesis and Analysis, LISA department, EPB, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.
# Content:
This dataset contains a test scene created and rendered with Blender [1] and the addon script [2] extended for Blender 2.8. We provide the Blender file and the rendered scene.
The scene contains a non-Lambertian (transparent-refractive (T) or mirror-specular (M)) sphere rendered in a regular camera array of 21x21 cameras.
In addition to the 3D model, we provide the rendered images : resolution of 2000x2000, the cameras are parallel, with a principal point at the center of the image.
The dataset contains:
- a `camera.json` file in OMAF coordinates system (Camera position: X: forwards, Y:left, Z: up, Rotation: yaw, pitch, roll) [3],
- a `parameters.cfg` generated with [2],
- a `texture_M` folder containing the rendered views in png format for the mirror object,
- a `texture_T` folder containing the rendered views in png format for the transparent object,
- a `mask` folder containing the mask indicating the sphere,
- a `depth` folder containing the associated depth maps in exr format.
# References and links:
[1] Blender Online Community, "Blender - a 3D modelling and rendering package." Blender Institute, Amsterdam: Blender Foundation, 2020.
[2] K. Honauer, O. Johannsen, D. Kondermann, and B. Goldluecke, "A Dataset and Evaluation Methodology for Depth Estimation on 4D Light Fields" in Asian Conference on Computer Vision, 2016,
https://github.com/lightfield-analysis/blender-addon
https://github.com/dbonattoj/blender-addon
[3] B. Kroon, "Reference View Synthesizer (RVS) manual [N18068]," ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11, Macau SAR, China, p. 19, Oct. 2018.
https://mpeg.chiariglione.org/standards/mpeg-i/omnidirectional-media-formatAcknowledgments:
This work was supported by:
Les Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Belgium, under Grant n°3679514$, ColibriH,
The European Commision project n°951989 on Interactive Technologies, H2020-ICT-2019-3, Hovitron.
Sarah Fachada is a Research Fellow of the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique - FNRS, Belgiu
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
