4 research outputs found
Dermatology Publications on COVID-19 during the First Pandemic Year: Creativity or Opportunism?
No full textIntroduction: Dermatologists had to face several challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this scenario, a large amount of data has been produced and published. Objectives: We present a literature analysis of publications on COVID-19 in the dermatology field in the first year of the pandemic. Methods: The research was carried out by searching the PubMed database using keywords related to “COVID-19” combined with the keyword “Dermatology” in the “affiliation” search field and collecting articles published from February 2020 to December 2020. Results: A total of 816 publications from 57 countries were retrieved. Overall, publications increased notably along the timespan considered in this study and appeared to be closely linked to pandemic progression in different countries. In addition, article types (i.e., commentaries, case reports, original research) appeared to be strictly influenced by the pandemic’s progression. However, the number and category of these publications may raise questions regarding the scientific relevance of the messages reported. Conclusions: Our analysis provides a descriptive quantitative analysis and suggests that publications do not always respond to real scientific needs but are sometimes linked to a need/opportunity for publication
Atopic Dermatitis: Clinical Aspects and Unmet Needs
No full textAtopic dermatitis is a common chronic-relapsing, inflammatory and itchy eczematous skin disorder which occurs in both children and adults. AD pathogenesis is complex and several factors are implicated. Pruritus plays a pivotal role in disease’s burden, significantly worsening atopic patient quality of life by limiting productivity and daily activities. AD diagnosis relies still on the experience of the healthcare professional and there are several unmet needs as for the diagnostic criteria, the management and the recognition of the burden of the disease. In this paper we present an indeep focus on the main clinical features of AD and the major unmet needs that should be addressed in the next research
Psoriasis and cancer: the role of inflammation, immunosuppression, and cancer treatment
No full textIntroduction: The relationship between psoriasis, immunomodulatory therapies, and the risk of malignancies is complex and still debated. The scarcity of evidence in this field makes clinicians hesitate to prescribe biological therapies for ‘difficult-to-treat’ patients. Areas covered: Based on a comprehensive MEDLINE/PUBMED search of articles published up to November 2024, this review synthesizes the current evidence on the association between psoriasis and cancer. This review specifically addresses four key aspects: the overall cancer risk in psoriatic patients, the potential role of cytokines involved in psoriasis pathogenesis in tumor development, the association between biological therapies and the incidence of new malignancies in this population, and the risk of cancer recurrence or progression in patients with a history of malignancy who are treated with biologics. Expert opinion: Biological therapies do not significantly elevate malignancy risk compared to non-biological treatments or the general population. Evidence is also reassuring for patients with prior malignancy, showing no tumor progression or recurrence. These findings support the timely use of biological treatments in ‘difficult-to-treat’ patients. Regular cancer screenings and risk-factor minimization should always be recommended for psoriatic patients undergoing immunomodulatory therapies. Multidisciplinary management involving oncologists is suggested, particularly for patients with active and advanced oncological disease
Real-world clinical experience with secukinumab in psoriatic arthritis: an observational study and a literature review
No full textObjective. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) can be treated with biological drugs targeting IL-17A, such as secukinumab, with good responses and long-term positive outcomes in clinical studies.
Methods. An observational study was conducted on adult subjects with PsA and comorbidities, treated with secukinumab after prior therapy with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs or biological agents that were discontinued due to lack of efficacy or adverse drug reactions. Patients were followed up with clinical visits at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and evaluated for disease activity, pain, and quality of life, with respect to values recorded at baseline. Moreover, a narrative review of the literature was performed on secukinumab’s use for PsA in real life.
Results. Fifteen patients completed 6 months of follow-up, eleven patients completed 9 months, and six patients were followed for 12 months. The major comorbidities recorded were fibromyalgia (33% of patients), recurrent bilateral anterior uveitis, and autoimmune thyroiditis with hypothyroidism (both 13% of the patients). A significant improvement in Disease Activity Score-28 was recorded at 6 and 9 months, while a significant difference vs. baseline was seen at 3, 6, and 9 months for the Psoriasis Area Severity Index. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index showed significant differences vs. baseline at 9 and 12 months. There was an improving trend at 9 and 12 months for pain scores and a significant improvement at 6 and 9 months for the physical component and at 12 months for the social component (Short Form 36 Health Survey quality of life scores). For the review of the literature, 35 articles were identified but only 17 papers were eventually considered.
Conclusions. Secukinumab has demonstrated effectiveness for PsA treatment in several real-world studies. Both patient-oriented and clinician-oriented outcomes showed a significant improvement with this treatment. The present real-world evaluation adds further evidence of the use of secukinumab for PsA treatment, showing the rapid, safe, clinically significant, and sustained responses of PsA patients affected by co-morbidities
