1,720,960 research outputs found
Induction of sister-chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster ovary cells of biotic ketoaldehyde methylglyoxal.
No full textInduction of sister-chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster ovary cells of biotic ketoaldehyde methylglyoxal
DNA DAMAGE INDUCED IN RATS BY ORAL ADMINISTRATION OF CHLORDIAZEPOXIDE PLUS SODIUM NITRITE OR OF N-NITROSOCHLORDIAZEPOXIDE
No full textHigher sensitivity for the detection of chemically-induced DNA damage: role of DNA unfolding in determining alkaline elution rate
No full textDNA-damaging activity of biotic and xenobiotic aldehydes in Chinese hamster ovary cells.
No full textExposure of CHO cells to biotic and xenobiotic aldehydes : DNA-damaging activit
FORMATION OF DNA-DAMAGING NITROSO COMPOUNDS BY INTERACTION OF DRUGS WITH NITRITE. A PRELIMINARY SCREENING FOR DETECTING POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS DRUGS.
No full text
Methylglyoxal-induced DNA-protein cross-links and cytotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary cells
No full texteffects of Methylglyoxal on induction of DNA-protein cross-links and cytotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary cell
A circular channel crucible oscillating viscometer. Detection of DNA damage induced "in vivo" by exceedingly small doses of dimethylnitrosamine
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
