1,720,964 research outputs found
Il mesoglicano in pazienti con arteriopatie ostruttive croniche degli arti inferiori: effetto sull'autonomia di marcia, lo spessore medio-intimale e la vasodilatazione flusso-mediata dell'arteria brachiale
No full textTranscarotideal access for endovascular repair descending thoracic aortic aneurysm with intentional coverage of celiac artery.
No full textEndovascular treatment of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm with celiac artery ostium coverage, seems to be safe according to the literature. We present a case in which the endograft deployement was achieved through a right common carotid artery access because four years before the patient was submitted to an axillo-bifemoral bypass with aortic graft removal and aortic stump ligature for infection. After endovascular repair the patient suffered from spinal cord ischemia, acute pancreatitis and spleen infarction. Probably, the new pancreatic event has been triggered by temporary visceral ischemia, acting on a pancreas damaged by a previous acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis
Effect of mesoglycan on walking distance in patients affected by chronic peripheral arterial occlusive disease
No full text
Procedure ibride (vascolari ed endovascolari)nel trattamento delle arteriopatie croniche ostruttive degli arti inferiori
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
