1,720,967 research outputs found

    IN-VIVO DELETERIOUS EFFECTS OF A RIGHT SHIFT OF THE HBO2 CURVE DURING HYPOXEMIA

    No full text
    We investigated the influence of a right shift of the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve on tissue oxygenation in two groups of anesthetized rabbits subjected to short periods of graded hypoxia: Group 1 (n = 5) with elevated P50 due to increased RBC 2,3-diphosphoglycerate and adenosine triphosphate and Group 2 (n = 5) with normal P50. Hemoglobin fell progressively in all animals due to blood letting for necessary measurements. During 16\% inspired O2 (FIO2), both groups remained stable. During 13\% FIO2, arterial pO2 was the same in both groups, but only in Group I did it fall below the crossover point (C.O.P.), which was raised by the high P50. Arterial pH and arterial-venous O2 content difference remained within the normal range in both groups throughout the experiment. During 13\% FIO2, animals with high P50 showed a fall in cardiac output and oxygen consumption while animals with normal P50 remained stable. We postulate that when systemic O2 content is sufficiently reduced and tissue O2 extraction is maximal, the O2 needs of the myocardium perfused with a pO2 below the C.O.P. cannot be met: under these conditions cardiac output and systemic O2 consumption fall, presumably due to a reduction in coronary blood flow

    Hemodynamic, renal, and hormonal responses to lower body positive pressure in human subjects

    No full text
    Studies in healthy human subjects subjected to lower body positive pressure (LBPP) have failed to elucidate many of the physiologic effects of this maneuver. In 7 healthy, well-hydrated men we studied the following responses to LBPP (35 mm Hg, 1 hour, supine position): systemic and renal hemodynamics; urine volume (UV), urine osmolality (Uosm), and urine sodium level (UNaV); free water (CH20) and osmolar (Cosm) clearances; plasma renin activity (PRA); levels of aldosterone (PA), cortisol (CORT), norepinephrine (NE), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), and vasopressin (AVP); osmolality (Posm); and serum sodium level. Subjects were restudied on a control day with zero trouser pressure. The recorded changes (p < 0.05) when comparing the LBPP day with the control day were as follows: fractional Na+ reabsorption increased (98.7% +/- 0.2% to 99.3% +/- 0.1%) and UNaV decreased (0.19 +/- 0.03 mEq/min to 0.10 +/- 0.01 mEq/min), with concomitant increases in PRA (1.7 +/- 0.2 ng/ml/90 min to 4.5 +/- 1.8 ng/ml/90 min), PA (7.7 +/- 0.7 ng/dl to 9.3 +/- 1.5 ng/dl), and CORT (13.0 +/- 2.6 mg/dl to 19.2 +/- 3 mg/dl); the increase in blood pressure with LBPP (96 +/- 3 mm Hg to 112 +/- 4 mm Hg) was greater than that during control conditions. Renal plasma flow tended to display an interactive pattern across days, with a slight decline during LBPP (5%) and a slight elevation under control conditions (9%). On the LBPP day only, filtered Na+ declined (15 +/- I mEq/min to 12 +/- 1 mEq/min) as a function of reduced glomerular filtration rate (112 +/- 5 ml/min to 91 +/- 7 ml/min), blood volume decreased (by 2.7% +/- 0.7%), CO decreased (5.5 +/- 0.3 L/min to 4.7 +/- 0.3 L/min), and stroke volume declined (101 +/- 6 ml to 84 +/- 3 ml). On both days, NE increased (control, 221 +/- 23 pg/ml to 340 +/- 33 pg/ml; LBPP, 236 +/- 17 pg/ml to 369 +/- 31 pg/ml) and ANP increased (control, 47 +/- 7 pg/ml to 97 +/- 21 pg/ml; LBPP, 49 +/- 10 pg/ml to 104 +/- 30 pg/ml). We concluded that LBPP reduces renal sodium excretion. The mechanism for this reduction is not known, although it did occur in association with an increase in plasma renin activity, which in turn results from mechanical reduction of renal perfusion, stress-related CORT stimulation, a reflex-based elevation in peripheral vascular resistance leading to a reflex increase in plasma renin activity, or a combination of these

    EFFECT OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE-PRESSURE BREATHING ON SODIUM AND WATER-EXCRETION

    No full text
    Positive and negative pressure breathing purportedly alter renal sodium and water excretion by modifying hemodynamics and/or hormonal regulators of sodium and water homeostasis. To test this hypothesis we monitored hemodynamic and hormonal responses in seven normal men to (1) continuous positive pressure breathing (19 +/- 1 mm Hg for 30 minutes) after water loading (urine volume = 15 +/- 1 ml/min); and (2) continuous negative pressure breathing (11 +/- 1 mm Hg for 30 minutes) after maintenance water ingestion (urine volume = 4 +/- 1 ml/min), in random order. Each study was repeated on a control day without pressure breathing. Results were as follows (mean +/- SE, p less than 0.05): (1) continuous positive pressure breathing decreased urinary sodium from 0.28 +/- 0.07 to 0.17 +/- 0.04 mEq/min, increased atrial natriuretic peptide from 34.2 +/- 4.9 to 48.5 +/- 6.9 pg/ml, and had no effect on osmolar and free water clearances, cardiac output, plasma renin activity, or plasma aldosterone and plasma arginine vasopressin levels; and (2) continuous negative pressure breathing increased free water clearance from 0.6 +/- 0.7 to 4.5 +/- 1.2 ml/min, urine volume from 4.0 +/- 0.8 to 8.9 +/- 1.3 ml/min, and cardiac output from 5.1 +/- 0.4 to 7.0 +/- 0.6 L/min in a proportional manner (r = 0.40, p less than 0.01) and had no effect on osmolar clearance, urinary volumes of sodium and potassium, plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone, atrial natriuretic peptide, and arginine vasopressin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore