1,721,001 research outputs found

    On Provenances: The Case of P. Köln XI 448

    No full text
    A reconsideration of the contents of P.Köln 448 allows to retrace it to its provenance (El Hibeh

    La 'verità' di Antimaco (A proposito della fonte Fisadia)

    No full text
    Analisi comparativa delle testimonianza riguardanti la localizzazione della fonte Fisadia. L’esiguità dei frammenti antimachei superstiti, combinata con certa cattiva fama del poeta in ambienti callimachei, rischia di oscurare la fallacia insita nell’applicare, come fa Callimaco, i concetti di vero e falso ad una narrazione mitica: evitando di adottare tout court il punto di vista che tenta di ricondurla a Realien, possiamo almeno domandarci cosa narrava Antimaco

    What is in an Idyll? Contrasting Modes in Theocritus, Idyll 10

    No full text
    In this paper I shall argue that Theocritus’ aim in Idyll 10 (in fact, in all of his Idylls) was to achieve the mimesis of a mimesis: to re-present a work of art, i.e. an act of mimesis – or more than one. I should term this kind of practice (ποίησις) a meta-mimesis: Theocritus shared it with several other Alexandrian poets of his time, all of them engaged in a reflection about art which was at heart and by nature a deeply philosophical one, though variously masqueraded and resolved into new ar

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore