1,721,001 research outputs found
On Provenances: The Case of P. Köln XI 448
A reconsideration of the contents of P.Köln 448 allows to retrace it to its provenance (El Hibeh
La 'verità' di Antimaco (A proposito della fonte Fisadia)
Analisi comparativa delle testimonianza riguardanti la localizzazione della fonte Fisadia. L’esiguità dei frammenti antimachei superstiti, combinata con certa cattiva fama del poeta in ambienti callimachei, rischia di oscurare la fallacia insita nell’applicare, come fa Callimaco, i concetti di vero e falso ad una narrazione mitica: evitando di adottare tout court il punto di vista che tenta di ricondurla a Realien, possiamo almeno domandarci cosa narrava Antimaco
What is in an Idyll? Contrasting Modes in Theocritus, Idyll 10
In this paper I shall argue that Theocritus’ aim in Idyll 10 (in fact, in all of his Idylls) was to achieve the mimesis of a mimesis: to re-present a work of art, i.e. an act of mimesis – or more than one. I should term this kind of practice (ποίησις) a meta-mimesis: Theocritus shared it with several other Alexandrian poets of his time, all of them engaged in a reflection about art which was at heart and by nature a deeply philosophical one, though variously masqueraded and resolved into new ar
Increased prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in females treated with dopaminergic drugs for hyperprolactinaemia.
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Il censimento dei papiri provenienti da Al Hiba : principi metodologici, con qualche esempio
- …
