179,345 research outputs found
Carta geomorfologica della Val Graveglia (Appennino ligure)
Brandolini P., Canepa G., Faccini F., Robbiano A., Terranova R. (2007) - Geomorphological and geo-environmental features of the Graveglia Valley (Ligurian Apennines). Geografia Fisica e Dinamica Quaternaria, 30, 99-11
Carta geomorfologica dell’Alta Val d’Aveto - finalizzata alla valutazione del pericolo da esondazione.
Brandolini P., Faccini, Robbiano A., Terranova R. (2008) - Relationship between flood hazards and geomorphology applied to land planning in the upper Aveto Valley (Liguria, Italy). Geografia Fisica e Dinamica Quaternaria, 31, 73-8
Dinamica geomorfologica della costa alta rocciosa tra Punta Baffe e Punta Moneglia (Liguria Orientale)
Dinamica geomorfologica della costa alta rocciosa tra Punta Baffe e Punta Moneglia (Liguria orientale)
The LEP four-jets puzzle
During the LEP run at root s = 130 - 140 GeV the ALEPH Collaboration reported a significant excess in the rate of four-jet production and a structure in the invariant mass spectrum. This structure was confirmed by ALEPH during the other two runs of LEP at root s = 161 and 172 GeV. The other three LEP experiments did not find any significant evidence for the same signal. A LEP working group was convened to study the subject. The main results of this work are reported and discussed in this paper
New Hadronic Spectroscopy
In the past few years the field of hadron spectroscopy has seen renewed interest due to the publication, initially mostly from B-Factories, of evidences of states that do not match regular spectroscopy, but are rather candidates for bound states with additional quarks or gluons (four quarks for tetraquarks and molecules and two quarks and gluons for hybrids). A huge effort in understanding the nature of this new states and in building a new spectroscopy is ongoing. This paper reviews the experimental and theoretical state of the art on heavy quarkonium exotic spectroscopy, with particular attention on the steps towards a global picture
The Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale-15: The First Validation Data About A New Clinician Report Tool For The Assessment Of Interpersonal Guilt
According to Control-Mastery Theory (CMT) guilt's origin is interpersonal, its aim is prosocial and
its function is adaptive. However, guilt can be also unconscious, irrational and pathogenic,
especially when generalized and repeatedly linked to shame and when it derives from pathogenic
beliefs (O'Connor et al. 1997; Locke et al., 2013). Our aim is to introduce a brief clinician-report
tool for the assessment of interpersonal guilt, the Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale-15 (IGRS-15
Gazzillo, Bush, Faccini, De Luca, Mellone, 2015), and its psychometric proprieties. The item set
derived from literature and from our clinical experience. We asked to 28 clinicians to assess 154
patients with: the IGRS-15; the Interpersonal Guilt Questionnaire-67 (IGQ-67; O'Connor et al.
1997); the Clinical Data Form (CDF; Westen, Shedler, 1999). An EFA on a random half of our
sample (N=70) and a CFA on the other half (N=84) were performed. The extracted factors on the
basis of both the scree plot procedure (point of inflexion of the curve) and factors with eigenvalue >
1 criterion are survivor guilt, separation/disloyalty guilt, omnipotent responsibility guilt and selfhate
guilt. All the subscales have good internal consistency, with Alpha's values from .80 to .87.
The ICC calculated on an item-per-item basis was .67, while the ICC of the scores of the four
different IGRS-15 factors was .86. The test-retest reliability was acceptable with Pearson's r from
.52 to .69. The assessment of guilt with the IGRS-15 show a good concordant validity with guilt
assessed with IGQ-67 and we collected first data about the construct validity of our tool. This scale
represent a first step in the direction of supporting the clinical judgement about interpersonal guilt
with an empirically sound, easy to use, tool
THE INTERPERSONAL GUILT RATING SCALE-15 SELF-REPORT (IGRS-15S): AN OVERVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL DATA
Our aim is to provide a complete review of the data collected so far with the Interpersonal Guilt Rating Scale-15 self-report (IGRS-15 s; Gazzillo et al., 2018), a 15-item clinician tool aimed at the assessment of interpersonal guilt according to Control-Mastery Theory (CMT; Gazzillo, 2016; Weiss, 1993). A CFA conducted on a sample of 645 subject found a three-factor solution: Survivor guilt, Omnipotence guilt (comprising the items assessing Omnipotent responsibility guilt and Separation/disloyalty guilt) and Self-hate. The re-test reliability assessed on a random subsample of 54 subjects was good (r from .70 to.76). To assess its concurrent and discriminant validity, we calculated the correlations between IGRS-15s and the Scale for the Measurement of the Impending Punishment (SMIP; Caprara et al., 1990) (r from .31 to .37), and the Interpersonal Guilt Questionnaire-67 (IGQ-67; O’Connor et al., 1997) (r from .34 to .88). To test its construct validity, we assessed the relationships with the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (ANPS; Davis et al., 2003) (r from -.14 to .28, all consistent with our theoretical predictions), and the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI; Dupuy, 1984), (r from -.19 to -.29). Finally, in a sample of 448 subjects, we found positive correlations between guilt and shame (r from .31 to .60) assessed with the Other As Shamer (OAS; Gross et al., 1994); no correlation between guilt and social desirability, assessed with the Marlow and Crow-Social Desirability Scale (MC-SDS; Italian brief form by Manganelli et al., 2000), negative correlations between guilt and self-esteem (r from -.29 to -.53), assessed with the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSE; Rosemberg, 1965); differences between people who report traumas in their early childhood and people who don’t; and negative correlations between guilt and therapeutic alliance assessed with the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI; Horvath, 1991) (r from -.17 to -.30)
- …
