1,720,977 research outputs found

    An experimental and theoretical evaluation of surface states in MgO and other alkaline earth oxides

    No full text
    Ultra-violet (u.v.) diffuse reflectance spectra of microcrystalline MgO, CaO, SrO and BaO reveal bands at energies below those of bulk excitonic transitions. Correlation of the spectra permit three distinctive absorptions (I, II, III) to be identified, each with similar characteristics in the respective oxides. The absorptions are ascribed to surface states, and the transitions have the characteristics of excitons. Excitons II and III obey the Mollwo-Ivey relation typical of bound excitons, but excition I with the highest energy of transition behaves similarly to a free exciton of the bulk. The four oxides are isostructural and ionic. The Levine-Mark theory of the surface states of ionic insulators, not hitherto tested for oxides, is examined. The numerical values of the parameters appropriate to the oxides are evaluated by using experimental data on bulk excitons. It is shown that the theory accounts satisfactorily for the energies of exciton I in MgO, CaO and SrO on the basis that it is an excitation of a surface anion located on a cube face of the crystal (fivefold coordination). Excitons II and III can only be tentatively assigned, but they are attributed to surface ions in fourfold and threefold coordination, respectively, the ions being at steps, edges or kink sites rather than on low-index faces, and thereby having a similar character to bulk excitons bound at internal lattice imperfections. The increased covalency shown by ions in low coordination prevents the application of the Levine-Mark theory

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore