1,721,217 research outputs found
Trattamento di seconda linea con FOLFIRI e aflibercept in paziente con adenocarcinoma del colon destro avanzato e BRAF mutato = Second-line treatment with FOLFIRI plus aflibercept in a patient with right-sided, BRAF mutated metastatic colon cancer
Si descrive il caso clinico di una paziente over 70 con buon PS, diagnosi di adenocarcinoma del colon
destro, BRAF mutato e MSI, con malattia ampiamente metastatica a livello linfonodale. La sequenza di trattamento
FOLFOXIRI bevacizumab (prima linea) e FOLFIRI aflibercept (seconda linea) ha consentito di citoridurre massimalmente
il carico di malattia e di prolungare notevolmente la sopravvivenza grazie all’intensificazione dei trattamenti (per l’aggressività associata alla mutazione BRAF) e all’effetto immunomodulante della terapia anti-angiogenica (per l’immunosoppressione associata allo status MSI).This is the case report of a woman with more than 70 years and good PS, with diagnosis of right sided, BRAF mutated and MSI-high colon cancer, diffusively metastatic to lymph nodes. The treatment sequencing of FOLFOXIRI bevacizumab (I line) and FOLFIRI aflibercept (II line) allowed to maximally shrink the disease burden and dramatically extend survival thanks to the treatments' intensification (due to BRAF mutation-related aggressiveness) and the immune-modulating effects of anti-angiogenic treatments (due to immune-suppressive burden associated with MSI-high status)
Continuing single-agent bevacizumab as maintenance therapy after induction XELOX (or FOLFOX) plus bevacizumab in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer
Metastatic colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Since 1995, treatment regimens have included capecitabine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, aflibercept, and reforafenib. These medications have doubled the median survival of patients and improved the 5-year survival from less than 1% to 20%. Approximately 75% of patients stop first-line chemotherapy in clinical trials for reasons other than progressive disease and face the question of whether to consider "maintenance" chemotherapy or take a chemotherapy break. In this challenging case, Drs. Díaz-Rubio, Pietrantonio, and de Braud reflect on the data and offer their opinions. If each of the nearly 40,000 patients in the U.S. who face this decision chooses bevacizumab, the total cost is approximately 6,000 per infusion). The importance of this question and the cost to society are enormous
Adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly : where do we come from and where are we going?
Objective: Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly reported cancer in the world and about 50% of patients are diagnosed over the age of 70 years. The authors discuss age-related changes in organ function, comorbidities and frailty in the elderly, and their impact on chemotherapy toxicity.
Methods: The authors review data from observational studies and subgroup analyses of randomized clinical trials on adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly colorectal cancer patients.
Results: Several large population-based studies suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy is offered less frequently to elderly patients, although in recent years the prescription patterns tended to significantly increase. In fact, data from retrospective analyses of randomized trials indicate that elderly stage III colorectal cancer patients may get similar clinical advantage from adjuvant treatment with fluoropyrimidines, although major comorbidities may substantially limit life expectancy and minimize the survival benefits. The use of oxaliplatin-based regimens needs to take into account the individual risk/benefit profile due to lack of unequivocal evidence of positive literature data.
Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer should be investigated by prospective trials specifically designed for the elderly. Fit elderly patients should be offered standard adjuvant treatments, while modified schedule, attenuated doses or even treatment omission can be offered to more frail patients
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
