1,721,005 research outputs found

    Enhancement and comprehensive evaluation of the Rating Curve Model for different river sites

    No full text
    This study presents an enhancement of the Rating Curve Model (RCM) proposed by Moramarco et al. (2005) which was initially formulated to assess discharge at a downstream river site where only stage is monitored while the flow is recorded at an upstream section and significant lateral inflow can occur along the river branch. The original model formulation is here of fact extended for upstream discharge estimate by assuming the flow known at a downstream site and stages measured at both ends. In this new configuration, the model can be applied to river reaches with negligible lateral inflow or to river reaches with significant lateral contribution but where a kinematic flow regime holds. The new model formulation is tested by considering two case studies, both selected in the Upper-Middle Tiber River basin, in central Italy. For the first case study, the model is applied to 22 flood events observed along three branches of the Tiber River with accurate rating curves at ends and having the same upstream river site. RCM successfully simulates the discharge hydrographs observed at the upstream section closely capturing both the peak rate and the time to peak, with average absolute errors less than 5% and 0.36 h, respectively. The model accuracy is found independent of the intermediate basin area and, hence, of the lateral inflow contribution. The rating curve computed in this upstream section by using the shortest reach is slightly overestimated whereas the ones derived by applying the model to the other two reaches are almost coincident and slightly underestimated, but for all of them the errors are less than 5%. The second case study concerns the estimation of the upstream rating curve at a river site, where discharge measurements are available for very low stages alone, starting from the flow known at two different downstream equipped sections. The RCM application to recorded flood events provides two very similar stage–discharge relationships with a maximum difference, between the reproduced rating curves, of about 5 m3/s for the higher stage values. Moreover, the RCM accuracy is shown to be satisfactory for river reaches located in physiographic regions (northern Italy and Slovak Republic) different from the one used for the model development and testing and considered in the two case studies mentioned above. Finally, the model capability to take implicitly account of the unsteady effects (i.e. rating loop) is shown through experimental data recorded by an ultrasonic flowmeter at a gauged site of the Tiber River as well as by considering a numerical test

    A grey-based methodology for representing uncertainty in discharge measurements at a gauged river site

    No full text
    The velocity-area method and entropy method for assessing with uncertainty discharge measurements at a gauged river site are analysed and compared; uncertainty is represented through the grey number technique. Two different approaches for greyfication of both the methods are presented. In the first approach, the uncertainty affecting each measurement used to estimate the discharge is characterized by a grey number: all the grey uncertainty components are then combined through the grey mathematics. In the second approach, greyfication is applied to the relationship expressing the total uncertainty on the discharge measurement, provided by the EN ISO 748 guidelines. Results of the application of the proposed methods to measurement data pertaining to a gauged Tiber river section show that the first greyfication approach leads to a larger discharge uncertainty estimate with respect to the latter. Furthermore, being the greyfication approach and the flow area quantification the same, the velocity-area and entropy methods provide nearly the same estimate of the uncertainty affecting the discharge measurements, i.e. the grey discharges they provide are fairly similar

    Modello per la stima della scala di deflusso in siti fluviali con sole registrazioni di livello

    No full text
    La stima della portata in una sezione dotata di misure di livello richiede la conoscenza della scala di deflusso che però può essere sconosciuta o affetta da notevole incertezza. Tra gli approcci proposti in letteratura per superare questi inconvenienti, vi è il modello RCM (Moramarco et al., 2005) che può essere impiegato quando la scala di deflusso è nota in una sezione a monte, anche a notevole distanza dalla sezione di interesse, tanto da dover considerare l’afflusso laterale presente nel tratto intermedio. In questo studio il modello RCM viene esteso al caso in cui la scala di deflusso è nota in una sezione posta a valle. Anche nella nuova formulazione il modello RCM risulta affidabile nella riproduzione degli idrogrammi di portata e nella ricostruzione della scala di deflusso in sezioni idrometriche poste in corsi d’acqua con caratteristiche morfologiche differenti fra loro

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore