1,720,994 research outputs found
Current practice in shoulder pathology : results of a web-based survey among a community of 1,084 orthopedic surgeons
No full textThe aim of this study was to report orthopedic surgeons' management of choice for difficult clinical scenarios of shoulder pathologies.
A web questionnaire was developed including four clinical scenarios of shoulder pathologies. Subsequently, opinions were solicited from more than 1,000 members of an international association of surgeons specialized in sports traumatology and knee surgery (ESSKA).
The response rate was 40% (412 questionnaires). For scenario 1, first anterior dislocation of the shoulder, the most indicated treatment for 71% of respondents was an arthroscopic Bankart repair (P < 0.001). For scenario 2, shoulder arthritis with concentric erosion and cuff tear, 38% chose a shoulder replacement, while 37% preferred a supraspinatus tendon repair in combination with long head of biceps (LHB) tenodesis or tenotomy. For scenario 3, large tendon tears with 70% fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus tendon and lateral LHB instability, 70% of surgeons considered that, among conservative treatments, hyaluronic acid injection was not an appropriate management. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic acromioplasty, and LHB tenotomy gained larger consensus (81, 80, and 79% of respondents, respectively). A double-row technique for rotator cuff repair was preferred to a single-row technique (P = 0.02). Scenario 4, adhesive capsulitis, split the respondents equally, with 51% in favor of a surgical approach and 49% in favor of a conservative approach (N.S.).
On-line questionnaires have the potential to improve knowledge about current trends in clinical practice and can help orthopedic surgeons to develop guidelines.
Level of evidence Cross-sectional; LevelV(expert opinion)
Management of knee injuries : consensus-based indications from a large community of orthopaedic surgeons
No full textPURPOSE: To describe preferences and to quantify the amount of agreement among orthopaedic surgeons regarding treatment options for four clinical scenarios of knee pathologies. METHODS: A web-based survey was developed to investigate the attitudes of members of an international association of surgeons specialised in sports traumatology and knee surgery European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy. RESULTS: The response rate was 40 % (412 questionnaires). An inter-rater agreement score (the Normalised Chi-square based Agreement Nomogram, NX2A) was calculated for each question. For scenario 1, 56-year-old male, degenerative medial compartment on both the femoral and tibial side, the surgical approach was preferred to the conservative approach (p < 0.001). Biological procedures were not considered appropriate, and in this respect, the respondents achieved a moderate degree of agreement (NX2A = 0.68). For scenario 2, 35-year-old male, early knee medial arthritis, the surgical treatment was preferred to conservative treatment (p < 0.001). The traditional closed-wedge tibial osteotomy was not regarded as an appropriate treatment with an excellent degree of agreement among surgeons (NX2A = 0.76). For scenario 3, 46-year-old male, ACL lesion, there was an almost disagreement, as respondents showed no preference between a surgical and conservative approach (NX2A = 0.005). Among surgical treatments, an almost perfect agreement with regard to the appropriateness of arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with a semitendinosus/gracilis graft was reached by the surgeons (NX2A = 0.8). For scenario 4, 69-year-old male, diffuse knee arthritis (all the compartments), an almost perfect agreement in favour of a total knee prosthesis was obtained for the management of this scenario (NX2A = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Web-based survey can help orthopaedic surgeons discuss and propose indications for clinical practice in the management of some of the most common joint diseases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cross-sectional survey, Level V
“Each to His Own”: Distinguishing Activities, Roles and Artifacts in EUD Practices
No full textEnd-User Development (EUD) studies how to empower end users (among which, e.g., professionals and organizational workers) to modify, adapt and extend the software systems they daily use, thus coping with the evolving needs of work organizations and their shop-floor environment. This research area is becoming more and more important also for the cross fertilization of ideas and approaches coming from the fields of Information Systems and Human-Computer Interaction. However, if one considers the variety of research proposals stemming from this common ground, there is the risk of losing denotational precision of the key terms adopted in the common vocabulary of EUD. To counteract this natural semantic drift, this paper focuses on three important notions, namely activities, roles, and artifacts, in order to help researchers distinguish important phenomena regarding the “meta-design” of systems built to support EUD practices
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
