1,721,065 research outputs found
Endobronchial valves
No full textThe AA describe a rare bronchial abnormality observed in a child with recurrent pneumoni
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia of Bochdalek: severe bronchial stenosis as a late complication of surgical repair.
No full textThe first 20 minutes after a single dose of inhaled salmeterol in asthmatic children
No full textVery little is known as yet about the effect of salmeterol in pediatric asthma, so a trial was performed on children with mild asthma to compare salmeterol with salbutamol in terms of how quickly they took effect. The double-blind study involved 11 children (mean age 13.4 years) randomly assigned to inhale salmeterol 50 micrograms, salbutamol 200 micrograms, or a placebo three times on alternate days. Peak expiratory flow (PEF), heart rate, and blood pressure were measured before and 5, 10, 15, and 20 min after administering the medication. With salbutamol, PEF was higher at 5 and 10 min, subsequently dropping off at 15 and 20 min; with salmeterol, PEF was better at 10 and 20 min. Forced expiratory volume at 1 s (FEV1) measurements taken at the baseline and after 10 and 20 min revealed an important and consistent rise in values after salmeterol, whereas salbutamol was more effective after 10 min than after 20 min. No significant changes were recorded in heart rate or blood pressure after salbutamol; after salmeterol, there was a significant increase in heart rate after 5 min, but not at subsequent measurements. In conclusion, salmeterol begins to take effect already within 10 min of a single administration in asthmatic children, although the onset of its effect is slower than with salbutamol
Effetto del Flunisolide sulla reattività bronchiale aspecifica in bambini asmatici in età prescolare
No full textGli AA. descrivono l'effetto del Flunisolide sulla reattività bronchiale aspecifica in bambini asmatici in età prescolare usando il test alla Mch e le variazioni della PC-Sat-HbO21
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
