114 research outputs found
A multicenter prospective study of patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair with intraperitoneal positioning using themonofilament polyester composite ventral patch: interim results of the PANACEA study
No full textFrederik Berrevoet,1 Carl Doerhoff,2 Filip Muysoms,3 Steven Hopson,4 Marco Gallinella Muzi,5 Simon Nienhuijs,6 Eric Kullman,7 Tim Tollens,8 Mark R Schwartz,9 Karl LeBlanc,10 Vic Velanovich,11 Lars Nannestad Jørgensen12 1Department of General and Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; 2General Surgery, Surgicare of Missouri, Jefferson City, MO, USA; 3Department of Surgery, AZ Maria Middelares Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; 4Bon Secours Hernia Center, Mary Immaculate Hospital, Newport News, VA, USA; 5University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 6Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; 7Medicinskt Centrum Linköping, Linköping, Sweden; 8Imelda Hospital-General Surgery Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium; 9Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, 10Our Lady of Lakes Regional Medical Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 11Tampa General Hospital, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; 12Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Purpose: This study assessed the recurrence rate and other safety and efficacy parameters following ventral hernia repair with a polyester composite prosthesis (Parietex™ Composite Ventral Patch [PCO-VP]).Patients and methods: A single-arm, multicenter prospective study of 126 patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair with the PCO-VP was performed. Patient outcomes were assessed at discharge and at 10 days, 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperative.Results: All patients had hernioplasty for umbilical (n = 110, 87.3%) or epigastric hernia (n = 16, 12.7%). Mean hernia diameter was 1.8 ± 0.8 cm. Mean operative time was 36.2 ±15.6 minutes, with a mean mesh positioning time of 8.1 ± 3.4 minutes. Surgeons reported satisfaction with mesh ease of use in 95% of surgeries. The cumulative hernia recurrence rate at 1 year was 2.8% (3/106). Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores showed improvement from 2.1 ± 2.0 at preoperative baseline to 0.5 ± 0.7 at 1 month postoperative (P < 0.001), and this low pain level was maintained at 12 months postsurgery (P < 0.001). The mean global Carolina’s Comfort Scale® (CCS) score improved postoperatively from 3.8 ± 6.2 at 1 month to 1.6 ± 3.5 at 6 months (P < 0.001). One patient was unsatisfied with the procedure.Conclusion: This 1-year interim analysis using PCO-VP for primary umbilical and epigastric defects shows promising results in terms of mesh ease of use, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction. Recurrence rate is low, but, as laparoscopic evaluation shows a need for patch repositioning in some cases, an accurate surgical technique remains of utmost importance. Keywords: intraperitoneal mesh, epigastric hernia, umbilical hernia, pai
Open ventral hernia repair with a composite ventral patch - Final results of a multicenter prospective study
No full textBackgroundThis study assessed clinical outcomes, including safety and recurrence, from the two-year follow-up of patients who underwent open ventral primary hernia repair with the use of the Parietex (TM) Composite Ventral Patch (PCO-VP).MethodsA prospective single-arm, multicenter study of 126 patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair for umbilical and epigastric hernias with the PCO-VP was performed.ResultsOne hundred twenty-six subjects (110 with umbilical hernia and 16 with epigastric hernia) with a mean hernia diameter of 1.8cm (0.4-4.0) were treated with PCO-VP. One hundred subjects completed the two-year study. Cumulative hernia recurrence was 3.0% (3/101; 95%CI: 0.0-6.3%) within 24months. Median Numeric Rating Scale pain scores improved from 2 [0-10] at baseline to 0 [0-3] at 1 month (P<0.001) and remained low at 24months 0 [0-6] (P<0.001). 99% (102/103) of the patients were satisfied with their repair at 24months postoperative.ConclusionsThe use of PCO-VP to repair primary umbilical and epigastric defects yielded a low recurrence rate, low postoperative and chronic pain, and high satisfaction ratings, confirming that PCO-VP is effective for small ventral hernia repair in the two-year term after implantation.Trial registrationThe study was registered publically at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01848184 registered May 7, 2013)
European Hernia Society (EHS) guidance for the management of adult patients with a hernia during the COVID-19 pandemic
No full textRobotic suprapubic eTEP retrorectus repair for incisional hernia
No full textAim
A retrorectus mesh position is often considered the most suitable for the repair of a midline incisional hernia. The minimal invasive extraperitoneal approach is gaining popularity.
Material & Methods
A 56-year-old female patient, who had a laparoscopic deroofing of a bile cyst in her history, presented with an incisional midline hernia (EHS M2-M3, width 6.6 cm). Preoperative optimization via dietary instructions reduced her BMI from 40 kg/m2 to a BMI of 35 kg/m2.
Results
A robotic extraperitoneal approach via suprapubic docking was performed. The patient is positioned supine and flexed for 15° at the level of the spina iliaca. An intraperitoneal trocar is placed to explore the abdomen for adhesions. Three trocars are placed in the suprapubic position in the extraperitoneal plane whereafter the robot is docked. A dissection in the cranial direction is performed in the retrorectus plane by incising both posterior rectus fascia in a symmetric way. A preperitoneal plane behind the linea alba is created. At the level of the hernia defect the hernia sac is opened, and adhesions are freed. Once the retrorectus space is dissected up to the xyphoid, the linea alba is reconstructed with a barbed suture size 0. A self-fixating mesh is placed in the retrorectus position. The posterior layer of the peritoneum is closed. The postoperative course was uneventful.
Conclusions
We present an extraperitoneal minimal invasive approach to the retrorectus plane allowing for an adequate retrorectus dissection and mesh placement like in a classical Rives-Stoppa repair
Robotic repair of a bilateral recurrent groin hernia in a kidney transplant patient
No full textAim
Due to the increased frequency of kidney transplantations and the high incidence of inguinal hernia in men, the coincidence of both features is not uncommon.
Material & Methods
A 58-year-old male patient with a history of a kidney transplantation in the right fossa due to bilateral shrivel kidneys, presented with a bilateral recurrent incisional hernia. Two years before he had an anterior bilateral groin hernia repair; a Liechtenstein repair on the left side and a partial preperitoneal repair with mesh reinforcement on the right side.
Results
The case was approached via a robot assisted TAPP (transabdominal preperitoneal) procedure to perform the preperitoneal dissection of the myopectineal orifices. At the region of the right inguinal hernia, the normal anatomy was distorted, due to the extraperitoneal course of the donor ureter which was freed accordingly. A partial mesh excision of the previous mesh was performed. The preperitoneal dissection area was covered with a self-gripping mesh. The postoperative course was uneventful.
Conclusions
The extraperitoneal course of the ureter in a kidney transplant patient challenges the surgical repair of an inguinal hernia. In primary groin hernias an anterior approach seems best suited, but in case of a recurrence after a previous anterior approach, a laparoscopic approach is a possible though challenging surgical option
Robot assisted parastomal hernia repair of an ileal conduit stoma
No full textAim
The optimal surgical treatment of a parastomal hernia after ileal conduit urinary division has yet to be determined. Data is scarce and reported recurrence rates after different approaches in parastomal hernia repair remain high.
Material & Methods
A 65-year-old male patient, who had a history of a radical cystectomy with an ileal conduit urinary diversion, presented with a recurrent symptomatic parastomal hernia. He had a previous repair of his parastomal hernia via an open retromuscular approach with a unilateral posterior component separation (transversus abdominis release).
Results
A robot assisted repair of the recurrent parastomal hernia was performed using a partial intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique (PIPOM). Intraoperatively, intraluminal Indocyanine green (ICG) was used to identify the ileal conduit loop. A closure of the defect was performed with a barbed suture whereafter the repair was reinforced with a PVDF IPST ‘Chimney’ parastomal mesh. The latter being partially covered by peritoneum. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient went home on postoperative day one. The patient had no complications and a well-functioning ileal conduit stoma 6 weeks after surgery.
Conclusions
The repair of a recurrent parastomal hernia after ileal conduit urinary division represents a surgical challenge. After a previous retromuscular approach, a robotic assisted approach using a partial intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique (PIPOM) represents a feasible technique with promising results
EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair
No full textBackground
Although the repair of ventral abdominal wall hernias is one of the most commonly performed operations, many aspects of their treatment are still under debate or poorly studied. In addition, there is a lack of good definitions and classifications that make the evaluation of studies and meta-analyses in this field of surgery difficult.
Materials and methods
Under the auspices of the board of the European Hernia Society and following the previously published classifications on inguinal and on ventral hernias, a working group was formed to create an online platform for registration and outcome measurement of operations for ventral abdominal wall hernias. Development of such a registry involved reaching agreement about clear definitions and classifications on patient variables, surgical procedures and mesh materials used, as well as outcome parameters. The EuraHS working group (European registry for abdominal wall hernias) comprised of a multinational European expert panel with specific interest in abdominal wall hernias. Over five working group meetings, consensus was reached on definitions for the data to be recorded in the registry.
Results
A set of well-described definitions was made. The previously reported EHS classifications of hernias will be used. Risk factors for recurrences and co-morbidities of patients were listed. A new severity of comorbidity score was defined. Post-operative complications were classified according to existing classifications as described for other fields of surgery. A new 3-dimensional numerical quality-of-life score, EuraHS-QoL score, was defined. An online platform is created based on the definitions and classifications, which can be used by individual surgeons, surgical teams or for multicentre studies. A EuraHS website is constructed with easy access to all the definitions, classifications and results from the database.
Conclusion
An online platform for registration and outcome measurement of abdominal wall hernia repairs with clear definitions and classifications is offered to the surgical community. It is hoped that this registry could lead to better evidence-based guidelines for treatment of abdominal wall hernias based on hernia variables, patient variables, available hernia repair materials and techniques
Use of a visceral protective layer prevents fistula development in open abdomen therapy: results from the European Hernia Society Open Abdomen Registry
No full textEuraHS - Vorstellung des online Ventral- und Inzisionalhernien-Registers der Europäischen Hernien Gesellschaft (EHS)
No full text
- …
