1,720,967 research outputs found
Überlegungen zu Macht- und Selbstverhältnissen bei Michel Foucault und deren mögliche Bedeutungen für (europäische) Ausblicke auf die Samurai und die Budo-Kampfkünste
No full textDieser Text entstand als erziehungswissenschaftliche Seminararbeit im Hochschulstudium an der Universität Köln im Rahmen eines Seminars über Michel Foucaults „Überwachen und Strafen“. In dieser Arbeit soll zuerst eine Darlegung der Macht- und Selbstverhältnisse bei Foucault mit einem Schwerpunkt auf Disziplinarmacht und späteren Macht-Herrschafts-Differenzen erfolgen. Anschließend folgen Überblicke und Diskussionen über die japanischen Samurai, Bushido, Zen-Buddhismus und die japanischen Budo-Kampfkünste inklusive deren Anwendung in therapeutischen oder pädagogischen Feldern. Die Überlegungen Foucaults dienen abschließend als Art „Projektionsfläche“ für Bushido und Budo, anhand der weitere Fragestellungen und mögliche Probleme grob skizziert oder lediglich angedeutet werden sollen.This text originated as a term paper in the field of education studies at the University of Cologne. The title of the corresponding seminar was „Michael Foucault – Discipline and Punish.“ This paper will first present the power relations and self-relations as defined by Foucault, focusing on disciplinary forces. In addition, it will discuss the differences between power and rule. The following chapter gives an overview of the Japanese Samurai, Bushido, Zen-Buddhism, and the Japanese Budo martial arts, including their application to therapeutic or educational fields. Finally, Foucault’s considerations will be used as a field of projection for Bushido and Budo. On the basis of these, further questions and possible problems will be outlined or at least pointed at.https://www.fpi-publikation.de/polyloge/21-2009-ewald-alexander-ueberlegungen-zu-macht-und-selbstverhaeltnissen-bei-michel-foucault/peerReviewedpublishedVersio
‚Kämpfen‘ in der Grundschule? – oder: Anleihen bei Spielen zur Bewegungsfreude, Ringen, Rangeln und Raufen sowie Martial & Meditation Arts als Basis einer AG (alias „Ringen, Rangeln, Raufen und mehr in der Grundschule“) inklusive performativem Projektteil mit Kindern im Grundschulalter
No full textIn Ewald (2015: 63f.) – ein Text der als Positionierungsarbeit gemeint war – wird auf die Notwendigkeit der Profilierung kampfkunstorientierter pädagogischer Projekte hingewiesen und für Kinder – im Unterschied zu Jugendlichen – nur angedeutet. Da sich der Verfasser seit August 2015 im Anerkennungsjahr an der Gemeinschaftsgrundschule mit offenem Ganztag in Bad Münstereifel befindet, wo eine eigenständige Projektarbeit und ein Handlungsschwerpunkt im Rahmen der Ausbildung gefordert sind, erschien es sinnvoll, entsprechende Projekte/AGs für diese Zielgruppe zu erwägen. So ist der vorliegende Text – bildlich gesprochen – als Anschluss an Ewald (2015) zu verstehen, in dessen Geflechte in allen Kapiteln stellenweise komprimiert zurückgelangt wird, allerdings bleibt die Ausarbeitung dabei nicht stehen: Neben der Differenz durch das Arbeitsfeld mit anderen Kindern und Situationen (Kapitel 3) und der Schwerpunkterarbeitung des Bewegungsfeldes „Ringen, Rangeln und Raufen“ (Beudels & Anders (2014)) sowie deren fort-führende Befragung (Kapitel 2.2.2 und 2.2.3) werden inhaltliche (v.a. embodiment), didaktisch-methodische (systemisch-konstruktivistische Ansätze) und ziel-, herausforderungs- und reflexionsbezogene Aspekte aus Ewald (2015) quellen- wie situationskritisch angegangen (Kapitel 2.1, 3-5). Daher ist dieser Text hoffentlich teilweise eine Fort(-)Schreibung von Ewald (2015).In Ewald (2015: 63f.) – a text meant as a positioning work – the necessity of profiling pedagogical projects that involve martial arts is remarked upon, whereas projects suitable for children – in contrast to teenagers – are only hinted at. As the author has been working at a full-time primary school in Bad Münstereifel since August 2015, which requires the completion of an autonomous project and an action focus in the course of the apprenticeship, it seemed useful to contemplate such projects/AGs for this target group. Therefore, this text can be understood figuratively as a connection to Ewald (2015) in which the threads are partly written in more compact form in all chapters. Still, the report does not end there: Apart from the difference caused by the work environment involving different children and situations (chapter 3) and the elaboration of the focus on the movement area “Ringeln, Rangeln & Raufen” (Beudels & Anders (2014)), whose subsequent survey is included as well (chapters 2.2.2 and 2.2.3), aspects covered in Ewald (2015) concerning the content (especially embodiment), didactics and methods (systemic-constructivist approaches), as well as aims, challenges and reflection are dealt critically with regard to sources and situations (chapters 2.1, 3-5). Therefore this text is hopefully in parts a continuation of Ewald (2015).https://www.fpi-publikation.de/polyloge/19-2015-ewald-alexander-kaempfen-in-der-grundschule-oder-anleihen-bei-spielen-zur/peerReviewedpublishedVersio
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
