1,720,969 research outputs found
sj-docx-1-pcr-10.1177_26323524231222496 – Supplemental material for Non-pharmacological interventions feasible in the nursing scope of practice for pain relief in palliative care patients: a systematic review
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-pcr-10.1177_26323524231222496 for Non-pharmacological interventions feasible in the nursing scope of practice for pain relief in palliative care patients: a systematic review by Suzan van Veen, Hans Drenth, Hans Hobbelen, Evelyn Finnema, Saskia Teunissen and Everlien de Graaf in Palliative Care and Social Practice</p
Supplemental Material - Being Seen as a Unique Person is Essential in Palliative Care at Home and Nursing Homes: A Qualitative Study With Patients and Relatives
No full textSupplemental Material for Being Seen as a Unique Person is Essential in Palliative Care at Home and Nursing Homes: A Qualitative Study With Patients and Relatives by Katrin Kochems, Everlien de Graaf, Ginette M. Hesselmann, and Saskia C. C. M. Teunissen in American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®</p
Supplemental_Material - Who Are Hospice Patients and What Care Is Provided in Hospices? A Pilot Study
No full textSupplemental_Material for Who Are Hospice Patients and What Care Is Provided in Hospices? A Pilot Study by Remco M. Koorn, Merel van Klinken, Everlien de Graaf, Rick E. G. W. Bressers, Adri P. Jobse, Frederieke van der Baan and Saskia C.C.M. Teunissen in American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®</p
Replication Data for: HOPEVOL, appropriate hospice care in the Netherlands
No full textThe quantitative and qualitative datasets comprise data from the HOPEVOL study a national study of appropriate hospice care in the Netherlands.
This study contains multiple datasets
1) HOPEVOL1 and HOPEVOL2study: The raw data from two dataset were merged to one complete set containing data from 803 patients admitted to hospices in the Netherlands in 2017 and 2018. In total 266 variables were collected from all patients.
2) HOPEVOL1 en HOPEVOL2 report The datasets comprises data from 204 patients contributed to an indepth symptom management practices overview, containing information on practices of 14 symptoms and use of three PROMS in total 296 variables
3) A data dictionary of all data collected in HOPEVOL1 and HOPEVOL2 in Dutch
4) HOPEVOL_hospice_characteristics: comprises information of structure and process of care of 42 hospices in 149 variables.
5) Dignity_caregiver: qualitative data, transcriptions of focusgroups interviews with caregivers working in hospices in the Netherlands discussing dignity and dignity conserving care practices in daily hospice care.
6) Dignity_patient: qualitative data: transcriptions of of interviews with patients exploring the meaning of dignity and dignity conserving care form the patient perspective.
7) Dignity_patient_dignity_inventory; contains patient characteristics, PDI outcomes and USD4D outcomes of 99 patients admitted to hospices in the Netherlands in 2021
INZICHT, validation of the Utrecht Symptom Diary - four dimensional
No full textThe validation of the USD-4D is performed in multiple studies
1) What do patients need to use the USD-4D in daily care
Qualitative data from individual interviews with 13 patients
2) What do healthcare professionals need to work with the USD4D in daily care
Quantitative data from a 49-item survey completed by 122 healthcare professionals
3) Content validity of the USD-4D from the patient perspective
Qualitative data from interviews with 12 patients
4) Content validity of the USD-4D from the health care professional perspective
Quantitative data from a survey completed by 601 healthcare professionals
5) Construct validity of the USD-4D using hypotheses testing
Quantitative data were used from two cohorts of patients with life limiting illness
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
