180,707 research outputs found
Everett C. Cogswell Postcards
Files include 3 digitized postcards sent by Everett C. Cogswell, while he was serving as Cook with the 310th Engineer Regiment, Company B. Postcards feature maritime scenes of Archangel, messages on the back are dated October 3, October 7, and November 22, 1918.http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89895/1/0740.zi
The Everett Interpretation
The Everett interpretation of quantum mechanics - better known as the Many-Worlds Theory - has had a rather uneven reception. Mainstream philosophers have scarcely heard of it, save as science fiction. In philosophy of physics it is
well known but has historically been fairly widely rejected. Among physicists (at least, among those concerned with the interpretation of quantum mechanics in the first place), it is taken very seriously indeed, arguably tied for first place in popularity with more traditional operationalist views of quantum mechanics. In this article, I provide a fairly short (15,000 words) and self-contained introduction to the Everett interpretation as it is currently understood. I use little technical machinery, although I do assume the reader has encountered the measurement problem already (at about the level of the well-known discussions by Penrose or Albert)
Everett C. Peck 1965-1967 Catalog
Field catalog for collector Everett C. Peck for specimens collected in 1965-196
No. 91 Philip C. Sturges, interview by Everett L. Cooley
Transcript (85 pages) of two interview by Everett L. Cooley with University of Utah history professor Philip C. Sturges on April 2 and 9, 1986. This interview is no. 91 in the Everett L. Cooley Oral History Project, and tape nos. 271, 272 and 273Sturges (b. 1917) recalls his early life in Iowa and later at the University of Utah, 1940s-1970s, where he headed both the University Press and the History Department. He discusses notable members of the University administration and faculty during that period. Interviewer: Everett L. Coole
Probability in the Everett World: Comments on Wallace and Greaves
It is often objected that the Everett interpretation of QM cannot make sense of quantum probabilities, in one or both of two ways: either it can’t make sense of probability at all, or it can’t explain why probability should be governed by the Born rule. David Deutsch has attempted to meet these objections. He argues not only that rational decision under uncertainty makes sense in the Everett interpretation, but also that under reasonable assumptions, the credences of a rational agent in an Everett world should be constrained by the Born rule. David Wallace has developed and defended Deutsch’s proposal, and greatly clarified its conceptual basis. In particular, he has stressed its reliance on the distinguishing symmetry of the Everett view, viz., that all possible outcomes of a quantum measurement are treated as equally real. The argument thus tries to make a virtue of what has usually been seen as the main obstacle to making sense of probability in the Everett world. In this note I outline some objections to the Deutsch-Wallace argument, and to related proposals by Hilary Greaves about the epistemology of Everettian QM. (In the latter case, my arguments include an appeal to an Everettian analogue of the Sleeping Beauty problem.) The common thread to these objections is that the symmetry in question remains a very significant obstacle to making sense of probability in the Everett interpretation
No. 51, C. Gregory Crampton, interview by Everett L. Cooley
Transcript (39, 17 pages) of interview by Everett L. Cooley with C. Gregory Crampton, retired history professor at the University of Utah, on January 19, 1984 at Bloomington, Utah. This interview is no. XX in the Everett L. Cooley Oral History Project, and tape nos. 51 and 52Crampton (b. 1911) recalls his early life and education in California, his career at the University of Utah in the Department of History, and his association with the , the American West Center, the Doris Duke Oral History project, and his studies at Glen Canyon, 1950s-1970s. Interviewer: Everett L. Coole
Probability in the Everett interpretation
The Everett (many-worlds) interpretation of quantum mechanics faces a prima facie problem concerning quantum probabilities. Research in this area has been fast-paced over the last few years, following a controversial suggestion by David Deutsch that decision theory can solve the problem. This article provides a non-technical introduction to the decision-theoretic program, and a sketch of the current state of the debate
A Prolegomenon to the Ontology of the Everett Interpretation
In this article, I briefly explain the quantum measurement problem and the Everett (Many-Worlds) interpretation, in a way that is faithful to modern physics and yet accessible to readers without any physics training. I then consider the metaphysical lessons for ontology from quantum mechanics under the Everett interpretation. My conclusions are largely negative: I argue that very little can be said in full generality about the ontology of quantum mechanics, because quantum mechanics, like abstract classical mechanics, is a framework within which we can consider different physical theories which have very little in common at the level of ontology. Along the way I discuss, and criticise, several positive ontological proposals that have been made in the context of the Everett interpretation: ontologies based on the so-called "eigenstate-eigenvalue link", ontologies based on taking the "many-worlds" language seriously at the fundamental level, and ontologies that treat the wavefunction as a complex field on a high-dimensional space
Everett Shinn
1 photographic printPhotograph of Everett Shinn wearing a light suit, standing on field, hand on hip, c. 1949
Everett Shinn
1 photographic printPhotograph of Everett Shinn standing on lawn in front of house with columns, c. 1949
- …
