1,724,240 research outputs found
Intervju med Birgit Evensen
No full textTeksten gjengir et intervju foretatt med Birgit Evensen, 10. november 2008.</jats:p
Evensen, Albert Stanley, [No Service Number]
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/384311Surname: EVENSEN. Given Name(s) or Initials: ALBERT STANLEY. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: [No Registration Number]. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 48331.229966
Item: [2016.0049.16604] "Evensen, Albert Stanley, [No Service Number]
Simuleringsprogrammet GRIDNODE
No full textI henhold til mine tidligere skrifter [Louis Evensen: Effektbalanceligningen for det generelle rumelement & Louis Evensen: Simuleringsmodel til dynamisk temperaturberegning for rumlig bygningskonstruktion] skal simuleringsmodellen GRIDNODE nærmere beskrives i det efterfølgende
La délimitation entre la Norvège et l'Islande du plateau continental dans le secteur de Jan Mayen
No full textEvensen Jens. La délimitation entre la Norvège et l'Islande du plateau continental dans le secteur de Jan Mayen. In: Annuaire français de droit international, volume 27, 1981. pp. 711-738
On the complexity of ethical claims related to shale gas policy
No full textIn a recent article in Local Environment, Matthew Cotton (2017) lays out a foundation for what an ethical approach to decision making on policy and planning in relation to shale gas development could look like. This is the most comprehensive attempt in peer-reviewed academic literature to characterise and explicate the requirements and constraints on ethically-justified policy in relation to this contentious extractive industry. Cotton (2017) uses Shrader-Frechette?s (2002) Principle of Prima Facie Political Equality (PPFPE) to critique policy and planning decisions in the UK in relation to shale gas development. The PPFPE focuses heavily on distributive and procedural justice and gives particular attention to the need for: equitable compensation for any harms sustained, access to information about potential harms, and ability to participate freely in decision making processes (Cotton 2017). Cotton?s (2017) articulation of an ethical framework by which to evaluate the fairness and appropriateness of policy on shale gas development is a major step in the right direction. Evensen (2015, 2016a) has asserted that an explicit account of the circumstances under which development would or would not be ethically justified is perhaps the biggest gap in the policy discourse and debates on this issue. Indeed, there have been numerous public claims about the ethicality of ?fracking? (shale gas development), but until Cotton?s (2017) foray into this area, the academic literature on the topic was quite limited (Evensen 2016a). A few prior articles had highlighted distributive justice issues related to fracking (Cotton 2013, Evensen 2015, Fry et al. 2015, Hardy and Kelsey 2015, Hays and de Melo-Martín 2014, Hotaling 2013, Malin 2014, Measham et al. 2016, Willow and Wylie 2014), procedural justice considerations (Cotton 2013, de Wit 2011, Evensen 2015, Finkel et al. 2013, Fry et al. 2015), and/or the role of precautionary thinking in ethical approaches to evaluating unconventional gas development (de Melo-Martín et al. 2015, Finkel and Hays 2013, Law et al. 2014). Cotton?s (2016) article draws together the range of distributive and procedural justice considerations; as such, it is one of the most important social scientific or humanistic articles written to date on this much-debated form of energy development. It offers a solid point of departure for ethical thought on shale gas policy; nevertheless, there is more work to be done. Following Cotton?s analysis, aspects of the PPFPE arise as problematic or require additional clarification, including: the role of compensation in distributive justice, the definition of a ?community?, the need for information provision, and the best way to ensure procedural justice. Two overarching issues that merit attention in relation to ethical thought on shale gas policy, but that were not addressed by Cotton (2016), are: (1) the role of shale gas development as just one means of energy extraction in a larger energy system ? development does not occur in a vacuum ? and (2) the role of virtue in determining ethicality of shale gas policies. I speak to these two issues and the four areas of Cotton?s argumentation requiring additional attention below
Ole Henrik Evensen(?), a member of the University of Utah ski team, competing in a Nordic ski race, circa 1992
No full textColor photograph of possibly Ole Henrik Evensen, a member of the University of Utah ski team, competing in a Nordic ski race, circa 1992
Give me a thousand gestures: Embodied meaning and severe, multiple disabilities in segregated special needs education
No full textAvhandling (doktorgrad) - Norges idrettshøgskole, 2018In this dissertation I investigate subjective embodied experiences of students in primary and secondary schools. The eight students participating in the study all have the diagnose multiple disability, yet they have a variety interests, meanings, social backgrounds and experiences. To develop knowledge that goes beyond the prevailing medical and social understandings of disability, I have applied phenomenology of perception as understood by Maurice Merleau-Ponty to attend to the students' perspectives. Due to the complexity of the disability, the participating students express them self through pre-symbolic, embodied gestures. Thus, in line with Merleau-Ponty's aim to provide a philosophy that extend empiricism and intellectualism, I have accredited movement as a third path towards knowledge about human experiences. Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of perception has provided a possibility to attend to movements and embodied gestures as non-symbolic expressions that are qualitatively different from, yet not inferior to symbolic language. To approach the subjective perspectives of the students in pedagogical everyday life, I have conducted close observations, taking part in everyday life in three special needs education units. The study's focus has been the subjective perspective of the students. Hence, close observations have provided data about lived experiences in lifeworlds where expressions are direct, without filters or manipulative intentions. I have also conducted phenomenological interviews with pedagogical staff members in order to shed light on how students and pedagogical staff co-create situations. The use of both observations and interviews has shed light on the particularly vulnerability and relational dependency in being a student with severe and multiple disability in the educational context.Paper I: Kristin Vindhol Evensen, Øyvind Førland Standal and Borgunn Ytterhus. Name of paper: "A golden paper, a chain and a bag. The meaning of things in a special needs education unit". Accepted in "Phenomenology & Practice", special issue "Things".Paper II: Kristin Vindhol Evensen, Borgunn Ytterhus and Øyvind Førland Standal. Name of paper: "He is not crying for real. Severe, multiple Disabilities and embodied Constraint in two special Needs Units". 2nd review in "Scandinavian Journal of Disabiltiy Research".Paper III: Kristin Vindhol Evensen and Øyvind Førland Standal. Name of paper: "Unfolding Reversibility: Spatiality and Special Needs Education". Submitted to Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology.Paper IV: Wenche Schrøder Bjorbækmo, Kristin Vindhol Evensen, Karen Synne Groven, Gro Rugseth and Øyvind Førland Standal. Name of paper: "Phenomenology of professional practices in education and health care: an empirical investigation". Submitted to "Phenomenology & Practice".Seksjon for kroppsøving og pedagogikk / Department for Physical Educatio
Offentlig forvaltning og avgrensning mot andre sektorer. Sektorinndeling på utvalgte næringsområder
No full textDiskusjonene om inndeling og avgrensning i institusjonell sektor er forankret i
Statistisk sentralbyrås prosjekt for revisjon av standard for sektorinndeling i
henhold til internasjonale retningslinjer, sektor 2014. Dette notatet er en fortsettelse
av diskusjonene i Evensen og Hedum (2010) og omhandler spesielt sektorinndeling
og avgrensning mot offentlig forvaltning. Mens Evensen og Hedum (2010)
redegjør for de prinsipielle retningslinjene som ligger til grunn for sektorinndeling
og avgrensning av offentlig forvaltning, tar dette notatet for seg anvendelse av de
prinsipielle retningslinjene for sektorinndeling og avgrensning innenfor ulike
næringsområder.
Næringsområdene er definert med utgangspunkt i standard for næringsgruppering
(SN2007). Det er ikke hensiktsmessig å ta for seg alle næringsområder i denne
sammenhengen. Enkelte næringsområder er spesielt knyttet til offentlig forvaltning
og her kan man finne såkalte gråsoner mellom offentlig forvaltning og de to andre
aktuelle sektorene, ideelle organisasjoner og ikke-finansielle foretak. De utvalgte
områdene som belyses i notatet er:
• Vann, avløp og renovasjon (VAR)
• Eiendomsdrift
• Samferdsel
• Levekår
• Helse
• Kultur
• Utdannin
- …
