1,720,966 research outputs found
The Collaborative Big Bang and Introduction to the European Vascular Research Collaborative.
No full text
Study Protocol of a Prospective Multicenter Observational Study Evaluating Acute Lower Limb Ischemia
Full text linkIntroduction: Acute lower limb ischemia (ALI) is a limb- and potentially life-threatening condition which requires urgent evaluation and treatment. Contemporary data on optimal therapy and prognosis of ALI are lacking, while surgical, hybrid, and foremost endovascular techniques have rapidly evolved over the past decades. Available clinical guidelines are not based on high-level evidence and do not fully reflect day-do-day practice. Contemporary data on etiology, procedural strategies as well as patient outcomes in ALI are urgently needed to improve care and prevent limb loss. The current study was initiated by the European Vascular Research Collaborative (EVRC), established by young European vascular specialists, and aims to provide insight into contemporary treatment strategies in ALI and its clinical results within Europe. In this manuscript we report the rationale and a detailed study protocol. Material and Methods: The proposed study is a prospective, international, multicenter, observational study on ALI (PROMOTE-ALI) (ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT05138679). Patients with ALI (Rutherford classification grade I -III) of one or both lower extremities will be included in the study. The primary endpoint of the study is amputation-free survival (AFS) at 30 d. Secondary endpoints are freedom from target limb reintervention, freedom from complications, clinical outcome of the index leg, and limb salvage and survival at 30 and 90 d after diagnosis of ALI. Conclusions: ALI remains a challenging condition and due to the heterogeneous etiology, clinical presentation and treatment strategies, a large multicenter study on this topic is needed to gain contemporary data on clinical outcomes and prognosis, especially for modern endovascular techniques. PROMOTE-ALI is expected to provide these data and set a benchmark for future randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
Prospective Multi-Center Longitudinal Study to Validate Accuracy of the Global Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) Score in Predicting Major Acute Limb Events in Patients With Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia Undergoing Endovascular Intervention: The PROMOTE-GLASS Study Protocol
No full textIntroduction: Developed by the Global Vascular Guidelines committee, the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS) is an angiographic scoring system used for quantifying infrainguinal disease extent and predicting treatment success with endovascular techniques (EVT). Currently, no other risk prediction model is available for patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) undergoing EVT. GLASS' validation and adoption outside academic institutions for research are limited. Thus, this longitudinal multicenter prospective study aims to examine GLASS' validity and reliability in predicting major acute limb events and overall survival (OS) in patients with CLTI undergoing EVT. Methods and analysis: This prospective, international, multicenter, observational study will include patients with CLTI undergoing EVT (PROMOTE-GLASS) (ClinicalTrials.gov; ID: NCT06186544) identified through routine clinical referrals and emergency visits to vascular units in participating centers. Only patients who are referred for EVT will be recruited. The primary outcomes are immediate technical success, immediate technical failure, and 1-year limb base patency. The secondary outcomes are major adverse limb events, major lower limb amputation, and OS in patients presenting with CLTI who undergo EVT up to 1 year after the procedure. Clinical and imaging data will be analyzed at the end of follow-up to validate risk prediction. This protocol outlines our approach for identifying cases, GLASS score calculation, outcome measures assessment, and a statistical analysis plan. Anticipated implications: PROMOTE-GLASS holds significant implications and can potentially revolutionize clinical decision-making by assisting clinicians in identifying patients who are likely to benefit from EVT. Ultimately, reduce the need for more invasive procedures and improve patient outcomes. Furthermore, PROMOTE-GLASS can provide useful information, including patient selection, for future randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating EVT for CLTI. PROMOTE-GLASS anticipated implications on the vascular community are rooted in its potential to improve patient care, inform future research, and address limitations in existing literature regarding CLTI treatment outcomes
Study Protocol of a Prospective Multicenter Observational Study Evaluating Acute Lower Limb Ischemia
Full text link
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
