1,720,954 research outputs found
Crowdfunding - A way to finance science?
No full textInterest in crowdfunding has been increasing in recent years, both from the economy and the scientific community. Besides artists and entrepreneurs, researchers are now also funding their projects through many small contributions from the crowd. However, the perceived use in Germany does not reflect the benefits of a crowdfunding campaign, especially in international comparison. This study investigates this issue by identifying the motives and barriers for crowdfunding in order to formulate recommendations for research institutions to encourage the use of crowdfunding.
By means of a literature review, first insights are gained which are then used to conduct qualitative interviews with eleven researchers who successfully completed a crowdfunding campaign. The results indicate that researchers in Germany use crowdfunding primarily to raise awareness for the subject and the scientific community in general. The initial assumption of the speed of crowdfunding as a motive was contradicted by the experts. The major barriers are the immense effort involved in a campaign and the lack of reputation for the concept of crowdfunding by German scientists. In addition, only subjects and projects with a high public relevance and funding volume of up to five digits are recommended for crowdfunding. Furthermore, the public exposure of the experts during the campaign was identified as an additional barrier.
These findings lead to three recommendations for research institutions to increase the use of crowdfunding: Firstly, universities should raise awareness for the subject of crowdfunding as an additional form of research funding and highlight the benefits of a crowdfunding campaign. Secondly, universities should cooperate with crowdfunding partners and utilize the networking capacities of a university. Lastly, universities should provide support to distribute the workload among interdisciplinary teams in order to enhance the effortreturn ratio of a crowdfunding campaign.
The chosen methodology and the scope of the thesis enable further research that might examine the perspective of the universities and the conditions in other countries. In addition, a largescale quantitative survey is required to validate the identified concepts statistically.Das Interesse am Konzept Crowdfunding ist in den letzten Jahren sowohl aus der Wirtschaft als auch aus der Wissenschaft gestiegen. Neben Künstlern und Entrepreneuren finanzieren nun auch Wissenschaftler ihre Projekte durch zahlreiche kleine Beiträge aus der Crowd. Allerdings spiegelt die wahrgenommene Nutzung in Deutschland nicht die Vorteile einer Crowdfunding-Kampagne wider, insbesondere nicht im internationalen Vergleich. Die vorliegende Studie untersucht diesen Umstand, indem sie die Motive und Barrieren für eine Finanzierung durch Crowdfunding identifiziert, um Empfehlungen für Forschungseinrichtungen zur Förderung von Crowdfunding zu formulieren. Durch eine Literaturanalyse werden erste Erkenntnisse ermittelt, welche dann für die Durchführung von qualitativen Interviews mit elf Wissenschaftlern, die bereits eine Crowdfunding-Kampagne erfolgreich abgeschlossen haben, verwendet werden. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass ForscherInnen in Deutschland Crowdfunding in erster Linie dazu verwenden, Aufmerksamkeit für das Thema und die wissenschaftliche Gemeinschaft im Allgemeinen zu schaffen. Die größten Barrieren sind der enorme Aufwand, der mit einer Kampagne verbunden ist, und die mangelnde Reputation des Konzepts des Crowdfunding seitens der deutschen Wissenschaft. Zudem eignen sich nur Themen und Projekte mit einer hohen Öffentlichkeitswirksamkeit und einem Fördervolumen von maximal fünfstelligen Beträgen. Darüber hinaus konnte die öffentliche Wahrnehmung der Experten während der Kampagne als zusätzliche Barriere identifiziert werden.
Diese Ergebnisse führen zu drei Empfehlungen für Forschungseinrichtungen zur Förderung von Crowdfunding: Es wird empfohlen das Bewusstsein für das Thema Crowdfunding als zusätzliche Form der Forschungsfinanzierung zu sensibilisieren und die Vorteile einer Crowdfunding-Kampagne hervorzuheben. Universitäten sollten mit Crowdfunding Akteuren (bspw. Plattformen und Experten) zusammenarbeiten und die Netzwerkeffekte einer Universität sollten genutzt werden. Die Universitäten sollten Unterstützung leisten, um die Arbeitsbelastung auf interdisziplinäre Teams zu verteilen, um so das Verhältnis zwischen Aufwand und Ertrag zu optimieren. Die gewählte Methodik und der Geltungsbereich der Thesis eröffnen weitere Forschungsmöglichkeiten, die die Perspektive der Universitäten und die Bedingungen in anderen Ländern untersuchen könnten. Darüber hinaus ist eine groß angelegte quantitative Studie erforderlich, um die identifizierten Konzepte statistisch zu validieren
The activity fields of Entrepreneurship networks
Get PDFEntrepreneurship plays a vital role in scientific literature and in public debates. Especially in these hightech and digitized times it happens more and more frequently that young entrepreneurs with a good idea make the breakthrough and set up an established company. Basically, there are an increasing number of start-ups and a trend towards independence. The economy of a country depends on young entrepreneurs in order to remain economically competitive in international competition. It follows that young entrepreneurs must be encouraged and supported. This support is expressed in various stages of foundation and through various fields of action. In the meantime, there are many offers for start-up support. These networks satisfy different fields of action along a foundation. However, a structured overview of these networks on which a young founder can orient himself and gain easily access to the offers of the networks, is missing until then.
This work attempts to present these offers clearly on a map and to categorize and present the commitment in the respective fields of action. In addition to this main objective, the following three key questions are investigated and answered in this work:
1. How can the Entrepreneurship Networks be assigned to the respective fields of action of Entrepreneurship Education?
2. What is the benefit of such a classification for potential entrepreneurs in detail?
3. Are these Entrepreneurship networks missing an important step? Might they improve their offer? Does the value chain cover every need a young entrepreneur might have?
For this purpose, the respective fields of action of the networks are first separated from each other along a founding and defined individually. Subsequently, a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches was used to filter and analyze the contents of the websites of the networks. The results of this investigation were transformed in a classification
The aim of this work is to produce a map that displays the existing networks in the world clearly. The map also contains information that is more detailed and the classifica-tion of the networks in the respective fields of action
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
