1,720,983 research outputs found
Reply: The Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse: The Questions and the Way Forward
See https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Presentation and Outcome of Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse
Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is often considered benign but recent suggestion of an arrhythmic MVP (AMVP) form remains incompletely defined and uncertain
Mitral Annular Disjunction of Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation: Three-Dimensional Evaluation and Implications for Mitral Repair
Background: The dynamic consequences of mitral annular disjunction (MAD) on the mitral apparatus and the left ventricle remain unclear and are crucial in the context of mitral surgery. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess mitral valvular, annular, and ventricular dynamics in mitral valve prolapse (MVP) stratified by presence of MAD. Methods: In 61 patients (mean age, 62 ± 11 years; 25% women) with MVP and severe mitral regurgitation undergoing mitral surgery between 2009 and 2016, valvular and annular dimensions and dynamics by two-dimensional transthoracic and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and left ventricular dimensions and dynamics were analyzed stratified by presence of MAD before and after surgery. Results: MAD (mean, 8 ± 3 mm) was diagnosed in 27 patients (44%; with a mean effective regurgitant orifice area of 0.55 ± 0.20 cm2 and similar to patients without MAD), more frequently in bileaflet prolapse (52% vs 18% in patients without MAD, P = .004), consistently involving P2 (P = .005). Patients with MAD displayed larger diastolic annular areas (mean, 1,646 ± 410 vs 1,380 ± 348 mm2), circumferences (mean, 150 ± 19 vs 137 ± 16 mm), and intercommissural diameters (mean, 48 ± 7 vs 43 ± 6 mm) compared with those without MAD (P ≤ .008 for all). Dynamically, mid- and late systolic excess intercommissural diameter, annular area, and circumference enlargement were associated with MAD (P ≤ .01 for all). MAD was also associated with dynamically annular slippage, larger prolapse volume and height (P ≤ .007), and larger leaflet area (mean, 2,053 ± 620 vs 1,692 ± 488 mm2, P = .01). Although patients with MAD compared with those without MAD showed similar ejection fractions (mean, 65 ± 5% vs 62 ± 8%, respectively, P = .10), systolic basal posterior thickness was increased in patients with MAD (mean, 19 ± 2 vs 15 ± 2 mm, P < .001), with higher systolic thickening of the basal posterior wall (mean, 74 ± 27% vs 50 ± 28%) and higher ratio of basal wall thickness to diameter (P ≤ .01 for both). However, after mitral repair, MAD disappeared, and LV diameter, wall thickness, and wall thickening showed no difference between patients with MAD and those without MAD (P ≥ .10 for all). Conclusions: MAD in patients with MVP involves a predominant phenotype of bileaflet MVP and causes profound annular dynamic alterations with considerable expansion and excess annular enlargement in systole, potentially affecting leaflet coaptation. MAD myocardial and annular slippage simulates vigorous left ventricular function without true benefit after surgical annular suture. Thus, although MAD does not hinder the feasibility and quality of valve repair, it requires careful suture of ring to ventricular myocardium, lest it persist postoperatively
Left Atrial Volumetric/Mechanical Coupling Index: A Novel Predictor of Outcome in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Background:Left atrial assessment is complex, particularly in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction due to interactions with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). Pilot data suggest that left atrial volumetric/mechanical coupling index (LACI) may be useful, but large outcome data are lacking.Methods:We enrolled a comprehensively characterized cohort of patients in sinus rhythm with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction diagnosis at Mayo Clinic from 2007 to 2011. Routinely measured left atrial volume index and tissue-doppler-imaging a' allowed LACI calculation as (left atrial volume index)/(tissue-doppler-imaging a'). Survival was the outcome measured.Results:The cohort's 4196 patients (69 [58-77] years, ejection fraction 40 [31-45]%) had mild FMR in 1505 and moderate-severe FMR in 1068. LACI was overall 5.06 (3.50-8.10) and increased with each FMR grade (3.86 [2.94-5.29] without FMR, 5.38 [3.80-8.02] with mild, 5.45 [1.49-8.07] with moderate/severe FMR; P<0.0001). At diagnosis, higher LACI was independently determined by more severe FMR and by higher left ventricular mass index, lower ejection fraction, higher E/e', and lower glomerular filtration rate (all P<0.0001). During follow-up 1588 (38%) patients died. In spline modeling, excess mortality appeared around LACI=6 and steeply increased thereafter (5-year survival 72 +/- 1% with LACI<6 and 49 +/- 2% with LACI >= 6, P<0.0001). Multivariable comprehensive adjustment showed LACI strong association with excess mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.41 [1.23-1.61], P<0.0001 for LACI >= 6). Independent link to mortality persistent across FMR grades (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.45 [1.13-1.86], P=0.004 without FMR, 1.42 [1.16-1.77], P=0.0008 with mild FMR, and 1.38 [1.01-1.66], P=0.04 with moderate/severe FMR) without interaction (P=0.3). LACI independent impact on outcome was incremental to that of left atrial volume index, tissue-doppler-imaging a', or any other characteristic including the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic-score (least significant P=0.02).Conclusions:In this large cohort, left atrial volumetric/mechanical coupling measured by LACI in routine practice integrates the influence of several morphological/hemodynamic determinants but displays progressive deterioration with increasing FMR severity in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. About outcome, higher LACI is strongly, independently, and incrementally associated with excess mortality, irrespective of FMR grade and in all subsets. Hence, LACI is a novel and critical measure in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, quantifiable in routine practice, which should be integrated in prognostication and decision-making
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
