1,720,956 research outputs found
Which educational follow-up method do atrial fibrillation patients prefer: in-person, online or app-based education?
No full textFund for Scientific Research, Flanders [T002917N]; BMS/Pfizer EuropeanType of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): The AF-EduCare study is a project supported by the Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders (T002917N). The AF-EduApp study is supported by an BMS/Pfizer European Thrombosis Investigator Initiated Research Program (ERISTA) grant
Time investments and questions raised by atrial fibrillation patients following a personalized educational follow-up strategy
No full textBackground: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has a complex treatment strategy. As stated in the recent guidelines for AF management, AF management requires a holistic and multidisciplinary approach in which a personalized follow-up strategy is important to involve patients in their care. This also includes the need for an improved communication method in which patients can contact the healthcare team between in-hospital follow-up moments to easily ask questions with a low threshold. Purpose: Two personalized follow-up methods for AF management (in-person and online) are currently being studied in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. The aim of this subanalysis is to evaluate time investment to answer patients' questions. Methods: At three Belgian hospitals, a total of 1.038 AF patients were randomized to two groups with personalized education and follow-up, and a control group. The educational intervention focuses on four elements: improving patients' AF knowledge, improving OAC therapy adherence, encouraging self-care capabilities based on personal AF risk factors, and the reachability of an AF specialized team. Patients in the in-person group were followed personally at the hospital at regular time points, while the patients in the online group received education via an online platform. During the whole follow-up period, patients of both intervention groups could ask questions via e-mail or by phone contact. Results: A total of 628 questions were raised by 275 patients (137 inFund for Scientific Research, Flanders [T002917N
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
The perspective of patients on the use of telemedicine in cardiovascular care
No full textfoundation Limburg Sterk Merk, province of Limburg, Flemish government
Time investments and questions raised by atrial fibrillation patients following a personalized educational follow-up strategy
No full textBackground: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has a complex treatment strategy. As stated in the recent guidelines for AF management, AF management requires a holistic and multidisciplinary approach in which a personalized follow-up strategy is important to involve patients in their care. This also includes the need for an improved communication method in which patients can contact the healthcare team between in-hospital follow-up moments to easily ask questions with a low threshold. Purpose: Two personalized follow-up methods for AF management (in-person and online) are currently being studied in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. The aim of this subanalysis is to evaluate time investment to answer patients' questions. Methods: At three Belgian hospitals, a total of 1.038 AF patients were randomized to two groups with personalized education and follow-up, and a control group. The educational intervention focuses on four elements: improving patients' AF knowledge, improving OAC therapy adherence, encouraging self-care capabilities based on personal AF risk factors, and the reachability of an AF specialized team. Patients in the in-person group were followed personally at the hospital at regular time points, while the patients in the online group received education via an online platform. During the whole follow-up period, patients of both intervention groups could ask questions via e-mail or by phone contact. Results: A total of 628 questions were raised by 275 patients (137 inFund for Scientific Research, Flanders [T002917N
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
