186,738 research outputs found

    Esme mudiensis Fraser 1931

    No full text
    <p>Esme mudiensis Fraser 1931</p> <p>Bedjanič, M. RMNH India 502041 30104083 KF369719 KF370118 KF369386 ODOPH262-13</p>Published as part of <i>Dijkstra, Klaas-Douwe B., Kalkman, Vincent J., Dow, Rory A., Stokvis, Frank R. & Tol, Jan Van, 2014, Redefining the damselfly families: a comprehensive molecular phylogeny of Zygoptera (Odonata). Supporting Information Table 2: List of analysed samples., pp. 1-10 in Systematic Entomology 39 (1)</i> on page 8, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/6652900">10.5281/zenodo.6652900</a&gt

    La Bentonite, Les argiles colloïdales et leurs emplois, par M. Déribéré et A. Esme, 1951

    No full text
    Sabatier Germain. La Bentonite, Les argiles colloïdales et leurs emplois, par M. Déribéré et A. Esme, 1951. In: Bulletin de la Société française de Minéralogie et de Cristallographie, volume 75, 7-9, 1952. p. 490

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Abstract P5-15-12: Real-life activity of oral vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer patients in the Unicancer ESME database

    No full text
    Abstract Background: In 2014, UNICANCER, composed of 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centers, launched the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) program to investigate real-world data in oncology. Real-world data give the opportunity to assess the activity of specific products outside the framework of clinical trials. Oral vinorelbine (OV) is one of the therapeutic options available for metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Few data are available regarding its real clinical efficiency in current practice. We aimed at evaluating such activity within the ESME population. Methods: The ESME-mBC database was built from information systems, treatment databases and patients' electronic files, with homogenous on-site collected information and high-level quality-control (Delaloge et al, Ann. Oncol 2016 (in press)). All patients having started a systemic treatment for mBC in a cancer center participating in the ESME program between 01-Jan-2008 and 31-Dec-2013 have been selected into the database. For the purpose of the current analyses, data cut-off was July, 2015 and all patients who received OV at any time during the course of their disease were selected and analyzed. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) from initiation of OV. Secondary end points were descriptive and prognostic analyses, and overall survival (OS). Results: Among 13.853 patients recorded in the ESME-mBC database, 1402 received OV as a monotherapy or in combination (809 and 593 patients / 57.7% and 42.3% respectively). Most frequent combinations were with capecitabine (368 patients) and anti-HER2 therapy (165 patients). De-novo mBC was observed in 282 patients (20.1%) and 569 patients (40.6%) had only non-visceral metastases. At metastatic diagnosis, 221 patients (16.9%) had HER2-positive and 298 patients (22.9%) triple-negative tumors respectively. At OV initiation, median age was 59.0 [IC95%: 50-67] years. Endocrine therapy was given prior OV in 769 patients (54.9%). For PFS analysis, 1345 patients were evaluable. The following table summarizes PFS results according to the treatment patterns and the OV-line. PFS results according to the treatment patterns and the OV-line  OV-line  1st line2nd line3rd line4th line and moreOverall populationN320414313270Overall populationPFS (months, [IC95%])4.7 [4.2-5.5]3.3 [3.0-3.5]2.9 [2.6-3.2]2.3 [2.1-2.4]OV monotherapyN118223207202OV monotherapyPFS (months, [IC95%])4.3 [3.1-5.3]3.2 [2.9-3.5]2.8 [2.5-3.2]2.2 [2.0-2.4]OV in combination with capecitabineN1531294925OV in combination with capecitabinePFS (months, [IC95%])5.1 [3.9-6.1]3.5 [2.8-4.6]3.0 [2.4-4.7]2.0 [1.4-5.2]OV in combination with anti-HER2N41503826OV in combination with anti-HER2PFS (months, [IC95%])6.0 [4.1-7.9]3.1 [2.4-3.8]3.3 [2.4-6.0]2.7 [1.9-3.7] Following diagnosis of mBC, median OS was 38.2 months [IC95%: 36.1-40.0] in the cohort of patients who received OV at any time. Conclusions:This study allows large scale assessment of real life benefit of OV over subsequent lines and shows that OV yields clinical benefit even in heavily pre-treated mBC patients. Citation Format: Pierre H, Mahasti S, Damien P, Nicolas M, Chritelle L, Florence D, Mony U, Lionel U, William J, Paule A, Audrey M, Claudia L, Mario C, Marie-Paule S, Marie-Ange M-R, Marianne L, Jean-Christophe E, Thierry P, Jean-Marc F, Bruno C, Anthony G, Christian C, Gaëtane S, David P. Real-life activity of oral vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer patients in the Unicancer ESME database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-15-12.</jats:p

    Comparison of Methylation Measurements Obtained Using MALDI-MS with Those from ESME Analysis of Directly Sequenced Bisulphite PCR Products

    No full text
    <div><p>(A) Comparison of methylation measurements obtained by MALDI-MS (x-axis) with ESME-processed data from sequencing (y-axis). Methylation rates at CpGs from forward and reverse sequencing were binned into ten intervals from zero to one using corresponding MALDI-MS measurements at the same CpGs and in the same tissue samples.</p> <p>(B) Comparison of methylation measurements obtained from ESME-processed data (x-axis) with measurements from MALDI-MS (y-axis). Methylation rates from MALDI are binned as in (A), using the corresponding methylation values from sequencing. Red lines show the means of the binned rates; bars show the standard deviations. The overall correlation of the data is 0.887. Data points that are not around a methylation rate of zero or one are covered by few measurements because of the bimodal distribution of methylation measurements.</p></div

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    No full text
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Older Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Limitations: Immigration and Other Factors Associated with Institutionalization

    No full text
    This study determined the national prevalence and profile of Asian Americans with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) limitations and identified factors associated with institutionalization. Data were obtained from 2006 American Community Survey, which replaced the long-form of the US Census. The data are nationally representative of both institutionalized and community-dwelling older adults. Respondents were Vietnamese (n =203), Korean (n = 131), Japanese (n = 193), Filipino (n = 309), Asian Indian (n = 169), Chinese (n = 404), Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (n = 54), and non-Hispanic whites (n = 55,040) aged 55 and over who all had ADL limitations. The prevalence of institutionalized among those with ADL limitations varies substantially from 4.7% of Asian Indians to 18.8% of Korean Americans with ADL limitations. Every AAPI group had a lower prevalence of institutionalization than disabled Non-Hispanic whites older adults (23.8%) (p < 0.001). After adjustment for socio-demographic characteristics, Asian Indians, Vietnamese, Japanese, Filipino, and Chinese had significantly lower odds of institutionalization than non-Hispanic whites (OR = 0.29, 0.31, 0.58, 0.51, 0.70, respectively). When the sample was restricted to AAPIs, the odds of institutionalization were higher among those who were older, unmarried, cognitively impaired and those who spoke English at home. This variation suggests that aggregating data across the AAPI groups obscures meaningful differences among these subpopulations and substantial inter-group differences may have important implications in the long-term care setting.The first author (Esme Fuller-Thomson) would like to gratefully acknowledge support received from the Sandra Rotman Endowed Chair in Social Work

    Withdrawn by Author

    No full text
    &lt;p&gt;Withdrawn by Author&nbsp;&lt;/p&gt

    Dissecting Backlash

    No full text
    David Caron and Esme Shirlow discuss the widespread criticism against investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS). They argue that these critiques must be disentangled in terms of the actors and substantive concerns. A main conclusion is that the misgivings may not be directed towards the dispute settlement mechanism itself, but rather concern broader worries about globalization.</p
    corecore