1,721,029 research outputs found
Hyperauthorship in Mikhail Bakhtin: The Primary Author and Conceptual Personae
This article explores the phemenon of hyperauthorship in intellectual writing: a primary author (hyperauthor) creates a number of secondary authors (hypoauthors), and develops possible conceptual systems on their behalf. The case under consideration is Mikhail Bakhtin and his complex relationship with his friends Pavel Medvedev and Valentin Voloshinov, members of the so called "Bakhtin's circle" (in the 1920s) who are credited with authorship of several books which may have been actually written by Bakhtin himself. Still unclear from biographical and historical perspectives, this problem of authentic attribution of Medvedev's and Voloshinov's texts can be clarified in the theoretical framework of "hyperauthorship" and "possibilistic thinking." This article applies Bakhtin's own theory of the "primary author immersed in silence," as well as Deleuze and Guattari's notion of "conceptual personae," to explain this case of "shared," or "transferred" authorship. The figures of Voloshinov and Medvedev, though historically real, may be viewed as Bakhtin's projections of "ideal," or "utopian" Marxism in linguistics and literary theory
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Filosofiia vozmozhnogo. (The Philosophy of the Possible).
This monograph studies the significance of modality for philosophy and the whole body of the humanities. According to the author, a professor at Emory University, from the indicative mode of pre-Kantian thought through the imperative mode of post-Kantian criticism philosophy enters a third epoch of thought in the conjunctive mode
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
The Index of the Interesting: A Formal Method for Evaluating Textual Quality
This paper presents the Index of the Interesting (II) — a formalized method for evaluating the quality of texts across genres, from scholarly theories to literary narratives. Building on the author's earlier theoretical work on "the interesting" as a cognitive-aesthetic category (Epstein 2001, 2009), the study operationalizes the original insight that interestingness equals provability divided by probability. The Index comprises a core function measuring unexpectedness and credibility, and a modulator capturing secondary parameters: interpositional tension, openness, rhythm, and resonance.
The paper provides theoretical foundations with reference to the etymology of "inter-esse" (being between), presents the formula's structure with detailed parameter descriptors, and offers calibration examples using canonical texts: Gogol's "The Overcoat," Chekhov's "The Lady with the Dog," Montaigne's "Of Friendship," Bacon's "Of Studies," Bakhtin's "Epic and Novel," and classical aphorisms from Hippocrates, La Rochefoucauld, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche. Genre-specific adaptations for essays, aphorisms, and other forms are discussed.
The method emerged through extended dialogue between the author and the large language model Claude (Anthropic), representing an early case of humanistic methodology developed through human-AI collaboration — what the author terms "syntellect" (a concept introduced in Epstein 2004). The paper reflects on the implications of this co-thinking for the future of humanistic research.
The Index of the Interesting offers both a diagnostic tool for authors and critics seeking to improve texts, and a theoretical framework for analyzing the qualities that make texts intellectually and aesthetically compelling
- …
