1,720,976 research outputs found
The assignment of Prodidactidae to Hyblaeoidea, with remarks on Thyridoidea (Lepidoptera)
No full textKaila, Lauri, Epstein, Marc E., Heikkilä, Maria, Mutanen, Marko (2013): The assignment of Prodidactidae to Hyblaeoidea, with remarks on Thyridoidea (Lepidoptera). Zootaxa 3682 (3): 485-494, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3682.3.
FIGURES 21–22 in The assignment of Prodidactidae to Hyblaeoidea, with remarks on Thyridoidea (Lepidoptera)
No full textFIGURES 21–22. External appearance of Hyblaea and Prodidactis. Fig. 21: H. fortissima (Butler), Fig. 22: P. mystica (Meyrick).Published as part of <i>Kaila, Lauri, Epstein, Marc E., Heikkilä, Maria & Mutanen, Marko, 2013, The assignment of Prodidactidae to Hyblaeoidea, with remarks on Thyridoidea (Lepidoptera), pp. 485-494 in Zootaxa 3682 (3)</i> on page 492, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3682.3.9, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10098517">http://zenodo.org/record/10098517</a>
FIGURES 19–20 in The assignment of Prodidactidae to Hyblaeoidea, with remarks on Thyridoidea (Lepidoptera)
No full textFIGURES 19–20. Pupa of Prodidactis mystica. Fig. 19: ventral view, Fig. 20: dorsal view.Published as part of <i>Kaila, Lauri, Epstein, Marc E., Heikkilä, Maria & Mutanen, Marko, 2013, The assignment of Prodidactidae to Hyblaeoidea, with remarks on Thyridoidea (Lepidoptera), pp. 485-494 in Zootaxa 3682 (3)</i> on page 492, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3682.3.9, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10098517">http://zenodo.org/record/10098517</a>
FIGURES 15–18 in The assignment of Prodidactidae to Hyblaeoidea, with remarks on Thyridoidea (Lepidoptera)
No full textFIGURES 15–18. Claw and the accessory setae of pretarsus of Hyblaea puera and Prodidactis mystica. S1 = seta 1, S2 = seta 2, S3 = seta 3, S4 = seta 4. Figs. 15, 16: H. puera; Figs. 17, 18: P. mystica.Published as part of <i>Kaila, Lauri, Epstein, Marc E., Heikkilä, Maria & Mutanen, Marko, 2013, The assignment of Prodidactidae to Hyblaeoidea, with remarks on Thyridoidea (Lepidoptera), pp. 485-494 in Zootaxa 3682 (3)</i> on page 491, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3682.3.9, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10098517">http://zenodo.org/record/10098517</a>
FIGURES 4–6 in The assignment of Prodidactidae to Hyblaeoidea, with remarks on Thyridoidea (Lepidoptera)
No full textFIGURES 4–6. Spinneret of the larvae of Hyblaeidae, Prodidactidae and Tortricidae. Arrows point at the distal lobes, an apomorphic trait of Hyblaeidae, Prodidactidae and Thyrididae. Fig. 4: Prodidactis mystica. Fig. 5: Hyblaea puera. Fig. 6: Argyrotaenia franciscana (Walsingham), the apex of the spinneret devoid of the lobes.Published as part of <i>Kaila, Lauri, Epstein, Marc E., Heikkilä, Maria & Mutanen, Marko, 2013, The assignment of Prodidactidae to Hyblaeoidea, with remarks on Thyridoidea (Lepidoptera), pp. 485-494 in Zootaxa 3682 (3)</i> on page 489, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3682.3.9, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10098517">http://zenodo.org/record/10098517</a>
FIGURES 7–14 in The assignment of Prodidactidae to Hyblaeoidea, with remarks on Thyridoidea (Lepidoptera)
No full textFIGURES 7–14. Details of larvae of Prodidactis mystica and Hyblaea puera. Figs 7–9: P. mystica; Fig. 7: head and thorax in lateral view; Fig. 8: head and thorax in dorsal view; Fig. 9: thorax in dorsal view showing the large pinacula. Figs 10–12: H. puera; Fig. 10: head and thorax in lateral view; Fig. 11: head and thorax in dorsal view; Fig. 12: thorax in dorsal view showing the absence of prominent pinacula. Fig. 13. Abdomen of P. mystica in lateral view. Fig. 14. Abdomen of H. puera in lateral view.Published as part of <i>Kaila, Lauri, Epstein, Marc E., Heikkilä, Maria & Mutanen, Marko, 2013, The assignment of Prodidactidae to Hyblaeoidea, with remarks on Thyridoidea (Lepidoptera), pp. 485-494 in Zootaxa 3682 (3)</i> on page 490, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3682.3.9, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10098517">http://zenodo.org/record/10098517</a>
FIGURES 1–3 in The assignment of Prodidactidae to Hyblaeoidea, with remarks on Thyridoidea (Lepidoptera)
No full textFIGURES 1–3. Hind coxae of denuded males of Prodidactis mystica (Meyrick) and Hyblaea puera (Cramer). Fig. 1: Hind coxa of P. mystica showing coxal processes (a). Photo courtesy of Marc Epstein and John W. Brown. The coxal processes on the P. mystica specimen photographed by Epstein and Brown (2003) are asymmetrical. We were unable to check whether this asymmetry is a general trait of the coxal processes of the species or a deformation of the individual examined. Unfortunately, the only male specimen of P. mystica we obtained for our examinations had only one of the two coxae intact, thus leaving the question about asymmetry unanswered. Fig. 2: Hind leg of a male H. puera treated in KOH solution showing large coxal process/sac (a); tibial hair-pencil (b); and enlargement of tibia (c). Fig. 3: Hind leg of a male H. puera, showing the inception point of the coxal process (a), and the tibial hair pencil (b).Published as part of <i>Kaila, Lauri, Epstein, Marc E., Heikkilä, Maria & Mutanen, Marko, 2013, The assignment of Prodidactidae to Hyblaeoidea, with remarks on Thyridoidea (Lepidoptera), pp. 485-494 in Zootaxa 3682 (3)</i> on page 486, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3682.3.9, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10098517">http://zenodo.org/record/10098517</a>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
