1,720,992 research outputs found

    Figure 20. Morphotype G in Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae)

    No full text
    Figure 20. Morphotype G, CE1263, Nais christinae. A, anterior ventral, segment II; B, posterior ventral, segment VII; C, dorsal. Scale bars: 3 Mm.Published as part of Envall, Ida, Gustavsson, Lena M. & Erséus, Christer, 2012, Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae), pp. 495-520 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165 (3) on page 508, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00828.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540812

    Figure 3. Morphotype A1 in Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae)

    No full text
    Figure 3. Morphotype A1, CE4104, Nais communis/variabilis. A, anterior ventral, segment II; B, posterior ventral, segment XII; C, dorsal. Scale bars: 3 Mm.Published as part of Envall, Ida, Gustavsson, Lena M. & Erséus, Christer, 2012, Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae), pp. 495-520 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165 (3) on page 499, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00828.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540812

    Figure 14. Morphotype D in Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae)

    No full text
    Figure 14. Morphotype D, CE3498 (A, B) and CE1955 (C), Nais elinguis. A, anterior ventral, segment IV; B, posterior ventral, segment IX; C, dorsal. Scale bars: 3 Mm.Published as part of Envall, Ida, Gustavsson, Lena M. & Erséus, Christer, 2012, Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae), pp. 495-520 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165 (3) on page 505, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00828.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540812

    Figure 11. Morphotype B in Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae)

    No full text
    Figure 11. Morphotype B, CE1130, Nais communis/variabilis. A, anterior ventral, segment II; B, posterial ventral, segment unknown; C, dorsal. Scale bars: 3 Mm.Published as part of Envall, Ida, Gustavsson, Lena M. & Erséus, Christer, 2012, Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae), pp. 495-520 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165 (3) on page 503, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00828.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540812

    Figure 16. Morphotype E in Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae)

    No full text
    Figure 16. Morphotype E, CE3762, Nais stolci. A, anterior ventral, segment IV; B, posterior ventral, segment VIII; C, dorsal. Scale bars: 3 Mm.Published as part of Envall, Ida, Gustavsson, Lena M. & Erséus, Christer, 2012, Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae), pp. 495-520 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165 (3) on page 506, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00828.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540812

    Figure 1 in Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae)

    No full text
    Figure 1. Schematic view of anterior part of naidine worm. Segment numbers are indicated by Roman numerals. AVC, anterior ventral chaetae; DC, dorsal chaetae; E, eye; HC, hair chaetae; NC, needle chaetae; Pe, peristomium; Pr, prostomium; PVC, posterior ventral chaetae.Published as part of Envall, Ida, Gustavsson, Lena M. & Erséus, Christer, 2012, Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae), pp. 495-520 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165 (3) on page 498, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00828.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540812

    Figure 24 in Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae)

    No full text
    Figure 24. Phylogenetic tree obtained from the Bayesian analysis of COI. Posterior probabilities> 0.75 as well as Bootstrap support values> 50% from the parsimony analysis are indicated at the nodes. Collection sites are given in brackets after the name of the specimens: AK, Alaska; AL, Alabama; CA, California; CN, China; IA, Iowa; IL, Illinois; NL, the Netherlands; SE, Sweden; UK, United Kingdom; green background, North American specimens; pink background, Chinese specimen; white background, European specimens. Vertical lines indicate morphotypes.Published as part of Envall, Ida, Gustavsson, Lena M. & Erséus, Christer, 2012, Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae), pp. 495-520 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165 (3) on page 511, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00828.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540812

    Figure 23 in Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae)

    No full text
    Figure 23. Phylogenetic tree obtained from the Bayesian analysis of the ITS region. The tree is rooted as suggested by the analyses of the COI and 16S genes. Posterior probabilities> 0.75 as well as Bootstrap support values> 50% from the parsimony analysis are indicated at the nodes. Collection sites are given in brackets after the name of the specimens: AK, Alaska; AL, Alabama; CA, California; CN, China; IA, Iowa; IL, Illinois; NL, the Netherlands; SE, Sweden; UK, United Kingdom; green background, North American specimens; pink background, Chinese specimen; white background, European specimens. Vertical lines indicate morphotypes.Published as part of Envall, Ida, Gustavsson, Lena M. & Erséus, Christer, 2012, Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae), pp. 495-520 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165 (3) on page 510, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00828.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540812

    Figure 22 in Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae)

    No full text
    Figure 22. Phylogenetic tree obtained from the Bayesian analysis of the combined molecular data set. Posterior probabilities> 0.75 as well as Bootstrap support values> 50% from the parsimony analysis are indicated at the nodes. The collection sites are given in brackets after the name of the specimens: AK, Alaska; AL, Alabama; CA, California; CN, China; IA, Iowa; IL, Illinois; NL, the Netherlands; SE, Sweden; UK, United Kingdom; green background, North American specimens; pink background, Chinese specimen; white background, European specimens. Vertical lines indicate morphotypes.Published as part of Envall, Ida, Gustavsson, Lena M. & Erséus, Christer, 2012, Genetic and chaetal variation in Nais worms (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae), pp. 495-520 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165 (3) on page 509, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00828.x, http://zenodo.org/record/540812
    corecore