1,720,964 research outputs found
Hukum tata negara indonesia
Perubahan konstitusi yang terjadi di awal era Reformasi, yang telah dilakukan oleh MPR pada tahun 1999, 2000, 2001, dan tahun 2002, telah banyak mengubah struktur ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Perubahan ini telah memasukkan beberapa prinsip baru, seperti pemisahan kekuasaan, check and balances, sampai dengan proses pemakzulan seorang presiden dengan memasukkan mekanisme proses hukum. Dalam soal kelembagaan perwakilan, telah menjadikan MPR sebagai lembaga perwakilan ketiga, setelah adanya lembaga perwakilan yang baru, DPD. Banyak yang menilai, Indonesia telah mengikuti model sistem parlemen dua kamar (bikameral).Kekuasaan kehakiman pun tak terlepas dari proses perubahan, dengan lahimnya Mahkamah Konstitusi yang mempunyai kewenangan antara lain untuk melakukan pengujian terhadap undang-undang serta memeriksa dan mengadil presiden dan wakil presiden atas tuduhan DPR. Namun, tekad untuk lebih memperkuat sistem pemerintahan presidensial tak semuanya terpenuhi, seiring dengan menguatnya Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, melalui sejumlah kewenangan, termasuk kewenangan dalam pengisian jabatan-jabatan publik.Perubahan yang terjadi di bidang hukum tata negara dimaksud menjadikan buku ini, Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, terasa diperlukan sebagai penyempurna dari sejumlah buku bacaan yang ada, yang mengkaji masalah hukum tata negara terkini
Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Pemilu Serentak Terhadap Pencalonan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Pada Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2019
Regulation on President and Vice President candidacy in the general elections of 2019 (simultaneous elections) has several alternatives; 1). All the political parties that pass the verification procedures and have rights to enter legislative are is entitled to propose candidates for President and Vice President, which means without any presidential threshold 2). Impose presidential threshold with some variants namely Candidate Pair of President and Vice President shall be nominated by a political party or coalition of political parties that gain; a). At least 20% of the seats in the House of Representatives or 25% of the valid votes nationwide. b). At least 15% of the seats in the House of Representatives or 20% of the valid votes nationwide c). At least 3% of the seats in the House of Representatives or 5% of the valid votes nationwide. d). Gain seats in the House of Representatives or presidential threshold is equal with parliamentary threshold
Perlunya Pengawasan Terhadap Kode Etik Dan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Rangka Menjaga Martabat Dan Kehormatannya
In the beginning, the external supervision on Constitutional Court Judges’ ethics and behavior was conducted by Judicial Commission. That was in accordance with the stipulation in Law No. 22 of 2004 and Law No. 4 of 2004. Yet the activity of supervision itself has yet to be conducted, due to Constitutional Court Ruling No. 005/PUU-IV/2006, which stated that Constitutional Court Judges are not subject to Judicial Commission’s supervision. Hence, the supervision was conducted internally by Constitutional Court itself. After the issuance of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (“PERPU”) No. 1 of 2013 on Second Amendment to Law No. 24 of 2003 (Law No. 4 of 2014), the authority of external supervision was once again being held by Judicial Commission. But with Constitutional Court Ruling No. 1-2/PUU-XII/2014, the PERPU was once again being canceled. Hence, the supervision on the judges is conducted internally via the Board of Ethics of the Constitutional Court. In the future, Constitutional Court Judges must be supervised by external body, but without violating their independency as judges. Yet, since Constitutional Court as the interpreter of Constitution once interpret the scope of “judges” in article 24B (1) of 1945 Constitution are limited to the Judge and Supreme Court Justice (Not including Constitutional Court Judge), to be able to conduct an external supervision to them, a revision on article 24B (1) of 1945 Constitution needs to be conducted
Prosecutor's Authority in Investigating Corruption Crimes Law Number 1 of 2023 comes Into Force
This study aims to examine and analyze the authority of the prosecutor's office in investigating corruption crimes after the enactment of the New Criminal Code which includes corruption crimes in the New Criminal Code. Although it has been affirmed that the prosecutor's office remains authorized to investigate criminal acts of corruption, the possibility of practical problems will still arise. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach, concepts, and comparisons. The results of the discussion of this study provide solutions to the limitations of the authority to investigate corruption crimes based on the type according to location, perpetrators, loss values, and types of corruption crimes that occurred
Position of Government Regulations for Replacement of Laws in Construction of Democracy Law State
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
