1,720,976 research outputs found

    Individualizing instruction in a generative CAI tutor

    No full text

    All I really need to know I learned in CS1

    No full text

    The case for Modula-2 in CS1 and CS2

    No full text

    All I really need to know I learned in CS1

    No full text

    Implications of Artificial Intelligence Abstract ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND AUTOMATIC PROGRAMMING IN CAI

    No full text
    This paper discusses generative computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and its relationship to Artificial Intelligence Research. Systems which have a limited capability for natural language communication are described. In addition, potential areas in which Artificial Intelligence could be applied are outlined. These include individualization of instruction, determining the degree of " accuracy of a student response, and problem-solving, A CAI system which is capable of writing computer programs is described in detail. Techniques are given for generating meaningful programming problems. These problems are represented as a sequence of primitive tasks each of which can be coded in several ways. The manner in which the system designs its own solutio

    The case for Modula-2 in CS1 and CS2

    No full text

    Input/Output for a CS1 Course in Java

    No full text

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore