1,721,153 research outputs found
The Contribution of H.O. Forbes to Indonesian Ethnography: A Biographical and Bibliographical Note
No full textEllen Roy F. The Contribution of H.O. Forbes to Indonesian Ethnography: A Biographical and Bibliographical Note. In: Archipel, volume 16, 1978. pp. 135-159
Innovation, 'hybrid' knowledge and the conservation of relict rainforest in upland Banten
No full textThe content of categories and experience; the case for some Nuaulu reptiles
No full textEllen Roy F., Stimson Andrew F., Menzies James. The content of categories and experience; the case for some Nuaulu reptiles. In: Journal d'agriculture traditionnelle et de botanique appliquée, 24ᵉ année, bulletin n°1, Janvier-mars 1977. pp. 3-22
Structure and inconsistency in Nuaulu categories for amphibians
No full textEllen Roy F., Stimson Andrew F., Menzies James. Structure and inconsistency in Nuaulu categories for amphibians. In: Journal d'agriculture tropicale et de botanique appliquée, vol. 23, n°7-12, Juillet-décembre 1976. pp. 125-138
Ellen Roy F. — Nuaulu settlement and ecology - an approach to the environmental relations of an eastern Indonesian community
No full textFriedberg Claudine. Ellen Roy F. — Nuaulu settlement and ecology - an approach to the environmental relations of an eastern Indonesian community. In: Journal d'agriculture traditionnelle et de botanique appliquée, 27ᵉ année, bulletin n°1, Janvier-mars 1980. pp. 83-86
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
