1,721,033 research outputs found
Online competency-based resident assessment for the discipline of anesthesiology: a needs assessment
In Canada, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) are
implementing a model of competency-based medical education (CBME) for all specialty-training
programs called Competence by Design (CBD). Anesthesiology is an RCPSC discipline that is
represented at all medical schools in Canada and is among the first specialties to adopt CBD. The
RCPSC model of CBD includes frequent observations and assessment of resident performance;
competence committees review this data in order to make decisions on resident progress. Electronic
portfolios are an important enabler in moving to CBD given the volume of assessment data, the
complexity of data generated, and the need for comprehensive reporting of resident competence.
The purpose of my study was to describe the perceived data needs and challenges of
anesthesiology programs when implementing CBD. In stage 1 of my study, stakeholders were
interviewed regarding their needs and challenges in handling CBD assessment data. Stakeholders in
stage 1 included 13 experts from the RCPSC CBD working group charged with defining the
competencies for anesthesiology at the national level. The findings from this stage were used to
help structure questions for stage 2 of my study, which included three focus groups. The resident
focus group comprised of 4 residents, the faculty focus group comprised of 3 faculty members, and
CBD focus group comprised of 5 CBD experts. Participants were recruited from across Canada
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
The evolution of a pattern language of feedback in medical education
Feedback is embedded within the fabric of medical education. Although the literature refers to feedback as if it were well-defined, in practice what feedback means can vary greatly. Consequently, it remains a source of consternation for learners and teachers as a process fraught with paradoxes. When done well, feedback can improve performance, however it can also have highly variable outcomes.
Through an in-depth examination of feedback, my research has acknowledged the challenges presented by it and other equally polysemic concepts. My research has considered the philosophical, theoretical, and methodological assumptions underpinning our existing approaches to feedback and in response I present a path to a more inclusive approach through the application of pattern theory.
To approach the task of applying pattern theory, I adapted scoping review methodology to develop a pattern system of feedback in medical education which includes 36 pattern representations. Through a comparative case study, I applied the pattern system to models of feedback, and I provided validity evidence for the pattern system. By outlining the connections between pattern representations within it, I also began to elaborate the pattern system into a pattern language. Finally, I used a case study research methodology to develop a thick description of the challenges of bringing this novel theory-informed conceptual framing of feedback into a more practical space. In all this work, I have advocated for generative (rather than successionist) models of explanations of feedback and lay the foundations for exploring the intersection of realist inquiry and pattern epistemology. Feedback is used as an illustrative case throughout this thesis. The pattern system of feedback I developed, my documentation of the disjointed discourses of feedback in medical education, and my description of this evolving pattern language of feedback can all serve to advance thinking and theory building in this conceptual space. Furthermore, my use of various methodologies to tackle this polysemic concept is, I will argue, a viable approach for studying other fuzzy concepts in our field. As such, not only can my work provide insights into feedback, but it also provides opportunities to explore other equally vexing problems
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
