1,720,962 research outputs found
Semantic segmentation of land cover from high resolution multispectral satellite images by spectral-spatial convolutional neural network
Research to improve the accuracy of very high-resolution satellite image classification algorithms is still one of the hot topics in the field of remote sensing. Successful results of deep learning methods in areas such as image classification and object detection have led to the application of these methods to remote sensing problems. Recently, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are among the most common deep learning methods used in image classification, however, the use of CNN’s in satellite image classification is relatively new. Due to the high computational complexity of 3D CNNs, which aim to extract both spatial and spectral information, 2D CNNs focussing on the extraction of spatial information are often preferred. High-resolution satellite images, however, contain crucial spectral information as well as spatial information. In this study, a 3D-2D CNN model using both spectral and spatial information was applied to extract more accurate land cover information from very high-resolution satellite images. The model was applied on a Worldview-2 satellite image including agricultural product areas such as tea, hazelnut groves and land use classes such as buildings and roads. The results of the CNN based model were also compared against those of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) algorithms. The post-classification accuracies were obtained using 800 control points generated by a web interface created for crowdsourcing purposes. The classification accuracy was 95.6% for the 3D-2D CNN model, 89.2% for the RF and 86.4% for the SVM
PSInSAR Points for Archaeology
The data is shp format. This data was produced from sentinel-1 satellite images with the StaMPS PSInSAR method.</p
Use of crowdsourcing in evaluating post-classification accuracy
“Crowdsourcing” uses masses of people to solve a specific problem, usually focusing on research strategies to reduce time, cost and effort to create data. Crowdsourcing intrinsically claims that groups can make relatively smarter and better decisions than the most intelligent individual among them. We investigated to see if crowdsourcing could be used to collect control points for usage in calculating post-classification accuracy assessments. For this purpose, a test was done using class values of randomly generated 1000 control points. Its goal was to explore the accuracy of a specific class values to be entered by three different users by utilizing majority voting method. While examining 3 data sets containing 1000 points, it could be observed that the class values of only 4 points were entered incorrectly. When the support vector machine classification results were evaluated, using the same 1000 control points generated by the experts and the crowdsourcing (containing 4 faulty points), the classification accuracies were found to be 85.0487% and 84.6154%, respectively. Results show that crowdsourcing offers a quicker and more reliable post-classification accuracy assessment for high-spatial resolution multispectral images
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Investigating the affect of texture information on the classification of hyperspectral images
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
