1,720,954 research outputs found
Hubungan Antara Pengetahuan dengan Perilaku Pengendalian Lalat pada Penjamah Makanan di Wisata Kuliner Seafood Pantai Bantul Yogyakarta
Latar belakang: Keracunan makanan adalah gejala yang disebabkan karena mengkonsumsi makanan yang beracun atau terkontaminasi bakteri atau mikroorganisme (Gaman dan Sherington, 1996). Setiap tahun di Amerika Serikat, diperkirakan 9 juta orang sakit, 56.000 dirawat di rumah sakit, dan 1.300 meninggal karena penyakit bawaan makanan yang disebabkan oleh patogen yang tidak diketahui (CDC, 2022). Salah satu penyebab keracunan makanan adalah makanan yang terkontaminasi oleh lalat. Usaha dalam mengendalikan lalat perlu dilakukan oleh penjamah makanan. Pengendalian lalat yang baik dipengaruhi oleh tingkat pengetahuan penjamah makanan mengenai pengendalian lalat. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara pengetahuan dengan perilaku pengendalian lalat pada penjamah makanan di wisata kuliner seafood di Pantai Bantul.
Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode analitik obervasional dan desain penelitian cross sectional. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan Total sampling. Instrumen penelitian yaitu kuesioner, untuk mengetahui variabel pengetahuan dan panduan obsevasi untuk mengetahui variabel perilaku pengendalian. Sampel penelitian adalah 80 penjamah makanan di area wisata Pantai Bantul. Analisis data menggunakan dengan uji statistic Chi Square.
Hasil: Hasil uji statistik menunjukkan bahwa penjamah makanan memiliki pengetahuan (51,2%) dan berperilaku pengendalian baik (56,3%). Kemudian terdapatnya hubungan antara pengetahuan (p-value = 0,021) dengan perilaku pengendalian lalat.
Kesimpulan: Terdapat hubungan antara pengetahuan dengan perilaku pengendalian lalat pada penjamah makanan di wisata kuliner seafood pantai Bantul
Hubungan Pengetahuan tentang Lalat dengan Perilaku Pengendalian Lalat pada Penjamah Makanan di Kawasan Kuliner Wisata Pantai Depok Bantul
Houseflies are the primary vectors for the spread of pathogens that cause foodborne diseases. Flies are commonly found on open food displays, such as those found in the coastal culinary tourism area of Depok Bantul. Food handlers play a crucial role in maintaining food hygiene. Their knowledge is a key factor influencing their behavior in fly control. This study aims to measure the knowledge about flies and its relationship with fly control behavior among food handlers in the Depok Bantul beach tourism area. The study used a Cross-sectional design involving 80 food handlers selected through purposive sampling. The instrument used was a closed-ended questionnaire that had been tested for validity and reliability. Data analysis was performed using the Chi-square test with a significance level of 0.05. The results showed that 51.25% of respondents had a high level of knowledge about flies, and 56.25% demonstrated good fly control behavior. Statistical tests showed a significant relationship between knowledge and fly control behavior (p=0.004; PR=4.364; CI 95%=1.696–11.229). Food handlers with high knowledge tended to have better fly control behavior. These findings emphasize the importance of ongoing education in raising awareness and preventive measures against the dangers of flies as disease vectors
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
